Advertisement

Brazil and the US Internet-Based Medicines

  • Matthew B. FlynnEmail author
  • Tiago Coutinho
  • Vera Lucia Luiza
Chapter

Abstract

Brazil and the United States share important commonalities and differences regarding Internet penetration, health literacy, and pharmaceutical coverage. In both countries, consumers are increasingly turning to the Internet in search of information and acquisition. Similarly, drug makers and distributors have used the Internet to advertise and market their products. Use and abuse of the Internet for prescription and over-the-counter drugs still differ due to government pharmaceutical policies that affect access and price, as well as the socioeconomic differences between the two societies. This chapter provides a review of the academic and gray literature about Brazil and US Internet-based medicine use, highlighting how the two cases compare and contrast in terms of access and appropriate use. Lastly, the chapter discusses the implications of these two countries’ realities in terms of market characteristics, government regulations, and growing pharmaceuticalization through the use of new digital media.

Keywords

Internet Medicines Direct-to-consumer marketing Social media Medicine access Pharmaceuticalization 

References

  1. ANFARMAG – Associação Nacional de Farmacêuticos Magistrais. 2017. Dispensação Remota de Produtos Farmacêuticos. http://portal.crfsp.org.br/images/stories/2016/06_16/anfarmag.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  2. Arrais, Paulo Sérgio Dourado, Maria Eneida Porto Fernandes, Tatiane da Silva Dal Pizzol, Luiz Roberto Ramos, Sotero Serrate Mengue, Vera Lucia Luiza, Noemia Urruth Leão Tavares, Mareni Rocha Farias, Maria Auxiliadora Oliveira, and Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi. 2016. Prevalence of self-medication in Brazil and associated factors. Revista de Saúde Pública 50: 50.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s1518-8787.2016050006117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachhuber, Marcus A., and Raina M. Merchant. 2017. Buying drugs online in the age of social media. American Journal of Public Health 107: 1858–1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkrot, Bill. 2015. Global drug spending to hit $1.4 trillion in 2020: IMS. Reuters, November 18. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-ims-drugspending-idUSKCN0T70GQ20151118. Accessed 20 June 2018.
  5. Brasil. Anvisa. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Diretoria Colegiada. 2009. Resolução-RDC No 44, de 17 de agosto de 2009. Dispõe sobre Boas Práticas Farmacêuticas para o controle sanitário do funcionamento, da dispensação e da comercialização de produtos e da prestação de serviços farmacêuticos em farmácias e drogarias e dá outras providências.Google Scholar
  6. Brasil. Presidência da República. Casa Civil. 1973. Lei Federal no. 5.991, de 17 de dezembro de 1973. Dispõe sobre o Controle Sanitário do Comércio de Drogas, Medicamentos, Insumos Farmacêuticos e Correlatos, e dá outras Providências. Vol. 17 de dezembro de 1973.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2014. Lei 13021 de 8 de agosto de 2014. Dispõe sobre o exercício e a fiscalização das atividades farmacêuticas. Diário Oficial da União, 11 de Agosto de 2014.Google Scholar
  8. Brody, Howard, and Donald W. Light. 2011. The inverse benefit law: How drug marketing undermines patient safety and public health. American Journal of Public Health 101: 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, Joshua, and Chenghui Li. 2014. Characteristics of online pharmacy users in a nationally representative sample. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 54: 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cabral, Rodrigo Viana, and Fabiana Schuelter Trevisol. 2010. A influência da internet na relação médico-paciente na percepção do médico. Revista da AMRIGS 54: 416–420.Google Scholar
  11. Chandra, Ashish, and Stephen Cupps. 2002. E-regulation and Internet pharmacies: Issues and dilemmas. Clinical Research & Regulatory Affairs 19: 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi, Sejung Marina, and Wei-Na Lee. 2007. Understanding the impact of direct-to-consumer (dtc) pharmaceutical advertising on patient-physician interactions: Adding the web to the mix. Journal of Advertising 36: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cicero, Theodore J., and Matthew Stephen Ellis. 2012. Health outcomes in patients using no-prescription online pharmacies to purchase prescription drugs. Journal of Medical Internet Research 14: e174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conrad, Peter, and Valerie Leiter. 2008. From Lydia Pinkham to Queen Levitra: Direct-to-consumer advertising and medicalisation. Sociology of Health & Illness 30: 825–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Consumers International. 2018. Consumers and the Internet of things: One connection too many? Divulgação cientifica. https://www.consumersinternational.org/news-resources/blog/posts/20170313-consumers-and-the-internet-of-things-one-connection-too-many/. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  16. Coutinho, Tiago, Angela Fernandes Esher, and Claudia Garcia Serpa Osorio-de-Castro. 2017. Mapeando espaços virtuais de informação sobre TDA/H e usos do metilfenidato. Physis: Revista de Saúde Coletiva 27: 749–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeLorme, Denise E., Jisu Huh, and Leonard N. Reid. 2010. Evaluation, use, and usefulness of prescription drug information sources among Anglo and Hispanic Americans. Journal of Health Communication 15: 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diário de Amapá. 2017. Prefeitura de Macapá e Anvisa interditam seis farmácias durante fiscalização. Diário do Amapá. http://www.diariodoamapa.com.br/2017/06/22/prefeitura-de-macapa-e-anvisa-interditam-seis-farmacias-durante-fiscalizacao/. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  19. Dukes, Graham, John Braithwaite, and J.P. Moloney. 2015. Pharmaceuticals, corporate crime and public health. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Ebeling, Mary. 2011. “Get with the Program!”: Pharmaceutical marketing, symptom checklists and self-diagnosis. Social Science & Medicine (1982) 73: 825–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. E-Commerce News. 2015. Comércio eletrônico de medicamentos enfrenta barreiras na legislação. E-Commerce News. https://ecommercenews.com.br/artigos/cases/comercio-eletronico-de-medicamentos-enfrenta-barreiras-na-legislacao. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  22. FDA – Food and Drug Administration. 2013. BeSafeRx: Know your online pharmacy – Survey highlights. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/BuyingUsingMedicineSafely/BuyingMedicinesOvertheInternet/BeSafeRxKnowYourOnlinePharmacy/ucm318497.htm. Accessed 15 May 2017.
  23. Fogel, Joshua, and Daniel Novick. 2009. Direct-to-consumer advertisements of prescription medications over the internet. Health Marketing Quarterly 26: 347–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Folha de Londrina. 2015. Vigilância intensifica fiscalização em farmácias. Folha de Londrina. http://www.folhadelondrina.com.br/geral/vigilancia-intensifica-fiscalizacao-em-farmacias-907767.html. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  25. Fox, Susannah, and Maeve Duggan. 2013. Information triage. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/information-triage/. Accessed 22 June 2018.
  26. Fox, N., K.J. Ward, and A.J. O’Rourke. 2005. The ‘expert patient’: Empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet. Social Science & Medicine 60: 1299–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fox, Nick, Katie Ward, and Alan O’Rourke. 2006. A sociology of technology governance for the information age: The case of pharmaceuticals, consumer advertising and the Internet. Sociology 40: 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. G1. 2016. Vendas pela internet devem dobrar até 2021, diz pesquisa do Google. Economia. October 17. http://g1.globo.com/economia/noticia/2016/10/vendas-pela-internet-devem-dobrar-ate-2021-diz-pesquisa-do-google.html. Accessed 18 July 2017.
  29. GAO – Government Accounting Office. 2005. Internet pharmacy and drug importation: Exploring risks and benefits : Hearing before the Special Committee on Aging, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session, Washington, DC, January 26, 2005. S. Hrg.: 109–23. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2013. Internet pharmacies: Federal agencies and state face challenges combating rogue sites, particularly those aboard: Report to congressional committees. [Washington, DC]: United States Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
  31. Gondim, Ana Paula Soares, and Cláudio Borges Falcão. 2007. Avaliação das farmácias virtuais brasileiras [Evaluation of Brazilian online pharmacies]. Revista de Saúde Pública 41: 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gondim, Ana Paula Soares, Davi Pontes Weyne, and Bruno Sousa Pinto Ferreira. 2012. Qualidade das informações de saúde e medicamentos nos sítios brasileiros [Quality of health and medication information on Brazilian websites]. Einstein (São Paulo) 10: 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. t’ Hoen, Ellen F.M. 2009. The global politics of pharmaceutical monopoly power. Diemen: AMB.Google Scholar
  34. Huh, Jisu, Denise E. DeLorme, and Leonard N. Reid. 2005. Factors affecting trust in on-line prescription drug information and impact of trust on behavior following exposure to DTC advertising. Journal of Health Communication 10: 711–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. IBGE – Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. 2017. Mais de 100 milhões de brasileiros já acessam a internet, diz IBGE. Estadão. http://link.estadao.com.br/noticias/cultura-digital,mais-de-100-milhoes-de-brasileiros-ja-acessam-a-internet-diz-ibge,10000090597. Accessed 2 July 2017.
  36. IDEC – Instituto de Defesa do Direito do Consumidor. 2012. Matéria - Diferença além da conta. Idec - Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor. http://www.idec.org.br/em-acao/revista/diferenca-que-incomoda/materia/diferenca-alem-da-conta/pagina/73. Accessed 1 May 2017.
  37. IDEC – Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor. 2017. Dicas & Direitos - conheça as regras para venda de medicamentos em farmácias. Idec - Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor. http://www.idec.org.br/consultas/dicas-e-direitos/conheca-as-regras-para-venda-de-medicamentos-em-farmacias. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  38. Inciardi, James A., Hilary L. Surratt, Theodore J. Cicero, Andrew Rosenblum, Ahwah Candice, J. Elise Bailey, Richard C. Dart, and John J. Burke. 2010. Prescription drugs purchased through the internet: Who are the end users? Drug and Alcohol Dependence 110: 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Interfarma – Associação de Indústria Farmacêutica de Pesquisa. 2016. Guia 2016 : Dados de Mercado. https://www.interfarma.org.br/guia/guia_2016/dados_de_mercado/. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  40. Jornal de Notícias. 2016. Duas farmacêuticas e seis médicos acusados de corrupção e burla. Jornal de Notícias. October 11. http://www.jn.pt/justica/interior/duas-farmaceuticas-e-seis-medicos-acusados-de-corrupcao-e-burla-5436438.html. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  41. ———. 2017. Farmacêutica detida por fraude. Jornal de Notícias. February 9. http://www.jn.pt/justica/interior/farmaceutica-detida-por-fraude-5657902.html. July 1 2017.
  42. Jornal i. 2013. Buscas a farmácias. Sete detidos por suspeitas de corrupção. Ionline. https://ionline.sapo.pt/371563. Accessed 20 June 2018.
  43. Kalorama Information. 2018. Global Over-the-Counter (OTC) drug markets : Market research report. January 23. https://www.kaloramainformation.com/Global-Counter-OTC-Drug-11401855/. Accessed 20 June 2018.
  44. Kapstein, Ethan B., and Josh Busby. 2013. AIDS drugs for all. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. KEI, Prescription Justice, EFF, and Public Citizen. 2017. Brussels principles on medication sales over the Internet. June 27. https://www.keionline.org/node/2817. Accessed 29 June 2017.
  46. Kim, Hyojin. 2011. Pharmaceutical companies as a source of health information: A pilot study of the effects of source, web site interactivity, and involvement. Health Marketing Quarterly 28: 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kim, Sean Hyungwoo, Young Joo Ryu, Na-Eun Cho, Andy Eunwoo Kim, and Jongwha Chang. 2017. Prescription drug price paradox: Cost analysis of Canadian online pharmacies versus US medicare beneficiaries for the top 100 drugs. Clinical Drug Investigation 37: 957–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lapão, Luís Velez, Miguel Mira da Silva, and João Gregório. 2017. Implementing an online pharmaceutical service using design science research. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 17: 31.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0428-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. LegitScript. 2016. The Internet pharmacy market in 2016. http://www.safemedsonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/The-Internet-Pharmacy-Market-in-2016.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  50. Light, Donald W. 2009. Bearing the risks of prescription drugs. In The risks of prescription drugs, 1–39. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Livingstone, Sonia. 2011. Internet literacy: Young people’s negotiation of new online opportunities. Matrizes.  https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v4i2p11-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Luiz, Silva. 1997. Farmáfia: falcatruas nos balcões de farmácias. Foz do Iguaçu: Imed Editora.Google Scholar
  53. Mackey, Tim K., and Bryan A. Liang. 2014. Digital Iatrogenesis: Policy advocacy to prevent patient harm from access to dangerous drugs online. Harvard Health Policy Review 14: 11.Google Scholar
  54. Mackey, Tim K., and Gaurvika Nayyar. 2016. Digital danger: A review of the global public health, patient safety and cybersecurity threats posed by illicit online pharmacies. British Medical Bulletin 118: 110–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mangan, Dan. 2014. Patients cross borders for online deals on medications. CNBC, May 23. https://www.cnbc.com/2014/05/23/patients-cross-borders-for-online-deals-on-medications.html. Accessed 2 Feb 2018.
  56. Mazer, Maryann, Francis DeRoos, Frances Shofer, Judd Hollander, Christine McCusker, Nicholas Peacock, and Jeanmarie Perrone. 2012. Medications from the web: Use of online pharmacies by emergency department patients. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 42: 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mintzes, Barbara. 2012. Advertising of prescription-only medicines to the public: Does evidence of benefit counterbalance harm? Annual Review of Public Health 33: 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Monteith, Scott, Tasha Glenn, Rita Bauer, Jörn Conell, and Michael Bauer. 2016. Availability of prescription drugs for bipolar disorder at online pharmacies. Journal of Affective Disorders 193: 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moreno, Gerardo, Elizabeth Lin, Eva Chang, Ron Johnson, Heidi Berthoud, Cam Solomon, and Leo Morales. 2016. Disparities in the use of internet and telephone medication refills among linguistically diverse patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine 31: 282–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Orizio, Grazia, Anna Merla, Peter J. Schulz, and Umberto Gelatti. 2011. Quality of online pharmacies and websites selling prescription drugs: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13: e74–e74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Orsolini, Laura, Giulia Francesconi, Duccio Papanti, Arianna Giorgetti, and Fabrizio Schifano. 2015. Profiling online recreational/prescription drugs’ customers and overview of drug vending virtual marketplaces. Human Psychopharmacology 30: 302–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pereira, Francisco Gilberto Fernandes, Joselany Afio Caetano, Natasha Marques Frota, and Maguida Gomes da Silva. 2016. Use of digital applications in the medicament calculation education for nursing. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería 34.  https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v34n2a09.
  63. Pew Research. 2017. Internet/broadband fact sheet. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/. Accessed 15 May 2017.
  64. Portal Correio. 2017. Saúde encontra fraude em 40% das solicitações de remédios do “Farmácia Popular”. Portal Correio. https://portalcorreio.com.br/saude-encontra-fraude-em-40-das-solicitacoes-de-remedios-do-farmacia-popular/. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  65. QuintlesIMS. 2016. IMS Health Study: U.S. Drug Spending Growth Reaches 8.5 Percent in 2015. IMS Health. November 7. http://www.imshealth.com/en/thought-leadership/quintilesims-institute/news-and-press. Accessed 19 May 2017.
  66. SEBRAE – Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas. 2015a. As regras para as farmácias online. Sebrae. http://www.sebrae.com.br/sites/PortalSebrae/artigos/as-regras-para-as-farmacias-online,f7e99e665b182410VgnVCM100000b272010aRCRD. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  67. ———. 2015b. Boas Práticas em Saúde Online - Dicas e orientações sobre o e-commerce de produtos e serviços de saúde. http://www.bibliotecas.sebrae.com.br/chronus/ARQUIVOS_CHRONUS/bds/bds.nsf/ceba8421b82be1b7ee7335c4fd3d7e7b/%24File/5777.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  68. Servidoni, Alexandre Barbosa, Liliane Coelho, Marcos de Lima Navarro, Fernanda Gobbi de Ávila, and Raquel Mezzalira. 2006. Self-medication profile of ENT patients. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 72: 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith, Nicole K., Kelly Cleland, Brandon Wagner, and James Trussell. 2017. “I don’t know what I would have done.” Women’s experiences acquiring ulipristal acetate emergency contraception online from 2011 to 2015. Contraception 95: 414–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Snyder Bulik, Beth. 2016. Pharma’s digital contact with docs now surpasses sales rep visits: Survey. Fierce Pharma. https://www.fiercepharma.com/marketing/pharma-digital-contact-doctors-now-surpasses-sales-rep-visits-survey-finds. Accessed 4 June 2017.
  71. Souza, João Fábio R. de, Carmem L.C. Marinho, and Maria Cristina R. Guilam. 2008. Medicine consumption and the internet: Critical evaluation of a virtual community. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira 54: 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Taylor, David, and Michael Bury. 2007. Chronic illness, expert patients and care transition: Chronic illness, expert patients and care transition. Sociology of Health & Illness 29: 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. UOL Notícias. 2015. Esquema de corrupção distribuía remédio vencido em 20 cidades do PR, diz TV. Cotidiano. https://noticias.uol.com.br/cotidiano/ultimas-noticias/2015/08/02/esquema-de-corrupcao-distribuia-remedio-vencido-em-20-cidades-do-pr-diz-tv.htm. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  74. Valor Econômico. 2014. Valor: Análise setorial: Farmácias e Drogarias. Valor Econômico. https://setorial.valor.com.br/produto/194/farmacias-e-drogarias. Accessed 20 June 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew B. Flynn
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tiago Coutinho
    • 2
  • Vera Lucia Luiza
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political Science and International Studies & Department of Sociology and AnthropologyGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services Policy, National School of Public HealthOswaldo Cruz FoundationRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations