Skip to main content

Relational Perception and Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Ontology and Closeness in Human-Nature Relationships

Abstract

Features of relationships such as love and closeness are not post hoc conceived of in response to a primary, material experience that does not contain them inherently. Instead, these existential elements can be perceived and known directly from the relational experience. With materialism and other human/nature dualisms accounted for, the ways in which one comes to know about these kinds of relational elements expands. The methods can include American pragmatist Charles Peirce’s notion of synechism of feeling, which is the relational continuity or sharing of feeling as an existential phenomenon surrounding and subsuming relational partners. Other forms of relational knowing include the sensory-emotional notion of poetic knowledge, the idea of “personal acquaintance knowledge” as knowledge about the “other” through the lens of the relationship between Knower and Known, and propositional knowledge once it has been cleansed of human/nature dualistic elements like detachment-promoting scientific objectivity and reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, D. R. (2004). Peirce’s horse: A sympathetic and semeiotic bond. In E. McKenna & A. Light (Eds.), Animal pragmatism: Rethinking human-nonhuman relationships (pp. 86–96). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press. (2003, October 7). Grizzly mauls, kills a bear ‘expert’. Seattle Post Intelligencer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backster, C. (2003). Primary perception: Biocommunication with plants, living foods, and human cells. Anza, CA: White Rose Millennium Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M., Desire, S., Gartside, S. E., & Wright, G. A. (2011). Agitated honeybees exhibit pessimistic cognitive biases. Current Biology, 21(12), 1070–1073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2006). Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H., Davidson, D. W., Munger, J. C., & Inouye, R. S. (1986). Experimental community ecology: The desert granivore system. In J. M. Diamond & T. J. Case (Eds.), Community ecology (pp. 41–61). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and nature. London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd..

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fantl, J. (2014). Knowledge how. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how

  • Gauch, H. G. (2003). Scientific method in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, F. (1973, December 11). Are plants ‘people’? Christian Science Monitor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism, 10th anniversary edition: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1989). A sand county almanac, and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press (Original work published 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquez, J. (2004, January 5). Was California bear advocate naturalist or ‘con man?’. Juneau Empire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medred, C. (2003, December 14). Man, martyr, myth. LA Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Objective. (2018, June). Oxford English dictionary online. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com

  • Peirce, C. S. (1960). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puthoff, H., & Fontes, R. G. (1975). Organic biofield sensor. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reliability. (2018, June). Oxford English dictionary online. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com

  • Riefe, J. (2017, November 1). Jane Goodall on sexism, controversial feeding stations and science deniers. The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved from https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/jane-goodall-sexism-controversial-feeding-stations-science-deniers-1055417

  • Rollin, B. E. (1990). How the animals lost their minds: Animal mentation and scientific ideology. In M. Bekoff & D. Jamieson (Eds.), Interpretation and explanation in the study of animal behavior (pp. 375–393). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1912). Problems of philosophy. New York: Longman, Green and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stodden, V., Leisch, F., & Peng, R. D. (Eds.). (2014). Implementing reproducible research. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., & Giugni, M. (2012). Common worlds: Reconceptualising inclusion in early childhood communities. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. S. (1998). Poetic knowledge: The recovery of education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. J. (1990). The power and the promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Z. (2009). The broken promises of monsters: Haraway, animals and the humanist legacy. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 7(2), 22–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kessler, N.H. (2019). Relational Perception and Knowledge. In: Ontology and Closeness in Human-Nature Relationships. AESS Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies and Sciences Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99274-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics