Skip to main content

Ecofeminist Dualisms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ontology and Closeness in Human-Nature Relationships
  • 1078 Accesses

Abstract

Ecofeminists have identified human/nature dualisms that work to reduce more-than-human beings to passive, material, objects. Theories constructed using these dualisms introduce a tension between modern human closeness experiences and explanatory theories where true reciprocal closeness is defined as improbable. Human/nature dualisms such as instrumentalism, individualism, materialism, and passive objectification all operate to reinforce this tension, with anthropocentrism as both human/nature dualism and by-product of the others. Monist materialism is also dualist in this sense because, no matter how broadly one construes it (even the new materialism of posthumanism) it relies wholly for its position on the negation of more-than-material possibilities such as spiritual experience. More-than-material ontological elements are initially designated as those that don’t comport easily and obviously with material explanations, and include things like feelings, consciousness, agency, love, telos, the spiritual and many others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Batisse, M. (1982). The biosphere reserve: A tool for environmental conservation and management. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff, M. (2000). Animal emotions: Exploring passionate natures. Bioscience, 50(10), 861–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). A vitalist stopover on the way to a new materialism. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 47–69). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2013). The world of attachment? The post-humanist challenge to freedom and necessity. Millennium, 41(3), 516–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and nature. London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evernden, L. L. N. (1992). The social creation of nature. Baltimore: JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s ecology: Materialism and nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaard, G. (2010). Ecofeminism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptchuk, T. J. (2002). Acupuncture: Theory, efficacy, and practice. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136(5), 374–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, N. (2012). Chaos or relationalism? A pragmatist metaphysical foundation for human-nature relationships. The Trumpeter, 28(1), 43–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. J. H. (1991). Caring about nature: Feminist ethics and the environment. Hypatia, 6(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. (2002). Loving nature: Towards an ecology of emotion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. J. (1990). The power and the promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. J. (2000). Ecofeminist philosophy: A western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49(6), 830–840.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kessler, N.H. (2019). Ecofeminist Dualisms. In: Ontology and Closeness in Human-Nature Relationships. AESS Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies and Sciences Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99274-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics