Balancing High-Speed Rotors at Low Rotation Speeds Using Parametric Excitation

  • Shachar Tresser
  • Amit Dolev
  • Izhak BucherEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 63)


Presented is a novel method allowing to perform mass balancing of flexible vibration modes, while rotating at low speeds. Through special external excitation, the projection of imbalance forces on vibration modes corresponding to high rotation speed can be found. The main merit of this method is that it uses measurements taken at low speeds, which anticipate the imbalance effects at considerably higher speeds. Standard mass balancing procedures of flexible bending modes, require the rotor to be rotated up to its operating speed. High speed rotors such as small jet engines and turbochargers cannot be rotated to such high speeds at laboratory conditions, and therefore are usually balanced using commercial balancing machines that are limited to low speeds. At low speeds it is impossible to detect the projection of imbalance forces on high frequency modes and thus low-speed balancing can worsen vibrations once the system is operational.

The present paper outlines a method whereby parametric excitation is employed to selectively amplify the imbalance response, and find the projection of the imbalance on any desired mode of vibration while rotating at low speeds. This means that the effect of imbalance at any critical speed, can be found without the need to actually rotate the device at these speeds.

In order to perform the proposed procedure, the system to be balanced is driven by actuators with signals containing several frequencies. These signals create an excitation pattern that creates large sensitivity to the forces caused by imbalance at low-speeds.


Dynamic balancing Parametric excitation Non linear vibration 


  1. 1.
    Bucher I, Ewins DJ (2001) Modal analysis and testing of rotating structures. Philos Trans R Soc London Math Phys Eng Sci 359:61–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Géradin M, Rixen D (2015) Mechanical vibrations: theory and application to structural dynamics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Genta G (2007) Dynamics of rotating systems. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ishida Y, Yamaoto T (2013) Linear and nonlinear rotordynamics: a modern treatment with applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Darlow MS (2012) Balancing of high-speed machinery. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foiles WC, Allaire PE, Gunter EJ (1998) Review: rotor balancing. Shock Vib 5:325–336. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pilkey WD, Bailey JT (1979) Constrained balancing techniques for flexible rotors. J Mech Des 101:304–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Little RM, Pilkey WD (1976) A linear programming approach for balancing flexible rotors. J Eng Ind 98:1030–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Untaroiu CD, Allaire PE, Foiles WC (2008) Balancing of flexible rotors using convex optimization techniques: optimum min-max LMI influence coefficient balancing. J Vib Acoust 130:21006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Darlow MS, Smalley AJ, Parkinson AG (1981) Demonstration of a unified approach to the balancing of flexible rotors. J Eng Power 103:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bishop RED, Parkinson AG (1972) On the use of balancing machines for flexible rotors. J Eng Ind 94:561–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nguyen-Schäfer H (2012) Rotordynamics of automotive turbochargers. Springer, Berlin. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agnieszka (Agnes) M (2005) Rotordynamics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 1128. Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tonoli A, Amati N, Bonfitto A, Silvagni M, Staples B, Karpenko E (2010) Design of electromagnetic dampers for aero-engine applications. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 132:112501. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holmes R (1983) The control of engine vibration using squeeze film dampers. J Eng Power 105:525. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dolev A, Bucher I (2015) A parametric amplifier for weak, low-frequency forces. In: 11th international conference multibody system nonlinear dynamics control. ASME, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dolev A, Bucher I (2016) Tuneable, non-degenerated, nonlinear, parametrically-excited amplifier. J Sound Vib 361:176–189. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tresser S, Bucher I (2016) A method for balancing high speed rotors from low rotation speed data using parametric excitation. In: Vibration in rotating machinery - VIRM 11, pp 769–783Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tresser S, Dolev A, Bucher I (2018) Dynamic balancing of super-critical rotating structures using slow-speed data via parametric excitation. J Sound Vib 415:59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dolev A, Bucher I (2018) Optimizing the dynamical behavior of a dual-frequency parametric amplifier with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities. Nonlinear Dyn 92(4): 1955–1974Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nayfeh AH, Mook DT (2008) Nonlinear oscillations. Wiley, HobokenzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zavodney LD, Nayfeh AH, Sanchez NE (1989) The response of a single-degree-of-freedom system with quadratic and cubic non-linearities to a principal parametric resonance. J Sound Vib 129:417–442. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical EngineeringTechnionHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations