Skip to main content

How Should We Value Nature?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Debating Nature's Value
  • 465 Accesses

Abstract

Nature is in crisis and urgently needs better protection. Our own well-being depends upon thriving nature. Economists say that nature will be better protected if we can assess it in monetary terms. This seems appealing—nature has been undervalued for too long. But there are risks and flaws in the Natural Capital approach—the way we experience nature or the simple right of nature to exist cannot be measured in this way. And putting a monetary value on nature’s services is risky—would we accept the loss of most bee species as long as the species that do most crop pollination are saved? Natural Capital accounting may be a useful tool in some limited circumstances but it is no substitute for strong regulation and policy reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. http://www.teebweb.org/publication/mainstreaming-the-economics-of-nature-a-synthesis-of-the-approach-conclusions-and-recommendations-of-teeb/

  2. 2.

    Natural Capital Committee (2015) Third report to the Economic Affairs Committee. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/natural-capital-committee-documents

  3. 3.

    Office of National Statistics (2016) UK natural capital: monetary estimates https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/environmentalaccounts/bulletins/uknaturalcapital/monetaryestimates2016

  4. 4.

    University of Reading (2015) Britain needs ‘super-sub bees’ to maintain food supply https://www.reading.ac.uk/news-and-events/releases/PR635710.aspx

  5. 5.

    Kleijn et al. (2015) Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation, Nature Communications https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms8414

  6. 6.

    https://www.foeeurope.org/nature-not-for-sale

  7. 7.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/natural-capital-committee-advice-on-governments-25-year-environment-plan

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Bell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bell, S. (2018). How Should We Value Nature?. In: Anderson, V. (eds) Debating Nature's Value. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99244-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99244-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99243-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99244-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics