Skip to main content

‘Natural Capital’ and the Tragedy of Environmental Value

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Debating Nature's Value
  • 481 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of natural capital offers environmentalists a dangerous metaphor. While it has limited positive uses for implementing the recognition that natural resources and the capacities of ecological systems are not free goods for the economy, at the level of earth systems it radically misrepresents the relationship between human beings and their planetary home. I argue that this is an economistically inflected instance of a more fundamental misrepresentation, that involved in seeking to attach values to our constitutive natural context at all; but also that we are so constituted as not to be able to avoid doing this so that value-conflict becomes tragically inescapable in this domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Those interested should see the papers in Part II of Foster (ed.) [4]. The case has been reiterated, in essentially the same terms, many times over the succeeding two decades.

  2. 2.

    Quoted by Richard Spencer in “Costing the earth” at https://www.icaew.com/-/media/corporate/files/technical/sustainability/costing-the-earth-oct-13.ashx?la=en (accessed 15.3.18).

  3. 3.

    See https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/wildlife/11679210/Bees-contribute-more-to-British-economy-than-Royal-Family.html (accessed 24.4.18).

  4. 4.

    See https://naturalcapitalcoalition.org/tony-juniper-talks-natural-capital-at-harmony-in-food-and-farming-conference-2017-video/ (accessed 24.4.18).

  5. 5.

    On which, see [5].

References

  1. Barbier, E. 2011. Capitalizing on nature: Ecosystems as natural assets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Daly, H. 1996. Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable development. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ekins, P., et al. 2003. A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics 44 (2–3): 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Foster, J., ed. 1997. Valuing nature? Economics, ethics and environment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Foster, J. 2008. The sustainability mirage. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Foster, J. 2018. On letting go. In Post-sustainability: Tragedy and transformation, ed. J. Foster, 168–184. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Greaves, T., and R. Read. 2015. Where value resides: Making ecological value possible. Environmental Ethics 37: 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holland, A. 1997. Substitutability: Or, why strong sustainability is weak and absurdly strong sustainability is not absurd. Valuing nature? Economics, ethics and environment, ed. J. Foster, 119–134. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hulme, M. 2014. Can science fix climate change? Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McDowell, J. 1998. Two sorts of naturalism. In Mind, value and reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sellars, W. 1956. Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, ed. H. Feigl and M. Scriven, vol. 1, 253–329. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson, M. 1995. The representation of life. In Virtues and reasons: Philippa foot and moral theory, ed. R. Hursthouse, G. Lawrence, and W. Quinn, 247–286. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Foster .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Foster, J. (2018). ‘Natural Capital’ and the Tragedy of Environmental Value. In: Anderson, V. (eds) Debating Nature's Value. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99244-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99244-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99243-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99244-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics