Skip to main content

Learning Mathematical Practices to Connect Abstract Algebra to High School Algebra

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Research in Mathematics Education ((RME))

Abstract

Making connections between advanced mathematical content, such as abstract algebra, and the mathematics of the school curriculum is a critical component of the mathematical education of future secondary teachers. In this chapter, I argue that engagement in mathematical practices (e.g., constructing arguments, attending to precision) can serve as a link for preservice teachers from their study of abstract algebra to the content they will teach as high school teachers. Using a multiple case study approach, I describe how four preservice teachers had opportunities to learn to engage in mathematical practices in their abstract algebra course. Participants were taking an abstract algebra course specifically designed for future teachers. Data sources include video records from the abstract algebra course and problem-solving interviews with each participant before and after the course. Each participant showed improvement in their mathematical practice engagement and reflected on how valuable a focus on mathematical practices would be in their teaching. These findings demonstrate the key role that mathematical practices play in the preparation of future teachers. There are valuable implications for the design of content courses for teachers and for the ongoing research into connections between advanced mathematics and the school curriculum.

Author Note: An earlier version of this paper was presented at the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Annual Meeting, in November 2015, in East Lansing, MI. The research for this paper was conducted as part of a dissertation study at Stanford University, and was supported in part by a Stanford Graduate School of Education Dissertation Support Grant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baldinger, E. E. (2014). Opportunities to develop mathematical knowledge for teaching in a math content course (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (Ed.). (2003). Teaching and learning mathematical practices. In Mathematical proficiency for all students: Toward a strategic research and development program in mathematics education (pp. 29–41). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, H. (2011). A vignette of doing mathematics: A meta-cognitive tour of the production of some elementary mathematics. Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(1&2), 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L. (1999). The practices of mathematicians: What do they tell us about coming to know mathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/3483312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P., & Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curricula. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90023-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P. (1981). The clinical interview in psychology research on mathematical thinking: Aims, rationales, techniques. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(3), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. A. (1997). Chapter 4: Observing mathematical problem solving through task-based interviews. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 9(1997), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/749946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, M., Hatch, G., & Rodd, M. (2003). Undergraduate mathematics experience: its significance in secondary mathematics teacher preparation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 361–393. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026362813351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, K. J., Li, Y., & Buck, J. C. (2000). Characteristics of mathematics teacher preparation programs in the United States: An exploratory study. Mathematics Educator, 5(1/2), 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, A. M., Gerberry, C. V., Moss, E. R., & Staples, M. E. (2010). Purposes and perceptions: What do university mathematics professors see as their role in the education of secondary mathematics teachers? PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 20(8), 646–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970902810733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, V. J., & Barton, B. (2007). Stages in the history of algebra with implications for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9023-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, E. J. (2002a). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, E. J. (2002b). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1976). In J. Worrall & E. Zahar (Eds.), Proofs and refutations. UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, S. P., & Zandieh, M. (2007). Proofs and refutations in the undergraduate mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9106-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschkovich, J. N. (2004). Appropriating mathematical practices: A case study of learning to use and explore functions through interaction with a tutor. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1–3), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000017691.13428.b9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschkovich, J. N. (2013). Issues regarding the concept of mathematical practices. In Y. Li & J. N. Moschkovich (Eds.), Proficiency and Beliefs in Learning and Teaching (pp. 257–275). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, E., Baldinger, E. E., Wasserman, N. H., Broderick, S., & White, D. (2017). Connecting advanced and secondary mathematics. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1(August), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotná, J., & Hoch, M. (2008). How structure sense for algebraic expressions or equations is related to structure sense for abstract algebra. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A., Clark, L. M., Ghousseini, H. N., Charalambous, C. Y., & Sealy, J. T. (2007). Where is the mathematics? Examining teachers’ mathematical learning opportunities in practice-based professional learning tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9039-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. A. (1994). Learning mathematics and learning to teach: Learning cycles in mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, N. M., Smith III, J. P., & Horvath, A. (2010). Collegiate mathematics teaching: An unexamined practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staples, M. E., Bartlo, J., & Thanheiser, E. (2012). Justification as a teaching and learning practice: Its (potential) multifaceted role in middle grades mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(4), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianides, A. J., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(4), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9077-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Philippou, G. N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(3), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9034-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabach, M., Levenson, E., Barkai, R., Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., & Dreyfus, T. (2011). Secondary teachers’ knowledge of elementary number theory proofs: the case of general-cover proofs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(6), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9185-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. L., & Dionne, J.-P. (2000). Accessing problem-solving strategy knowledge: The complementary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.92.3.413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEDS-M International Study Center. (2010). Released Items: Future teacher mathematics content knowledge and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge - secondary. MI: East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. F. Coxford & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), The Ideas of Algebra, K-12 (pp. 8–19). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, N. H. (2016). Abstract algebra for algebra teaching: Influencing school mathematics instruction. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1093200

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin E. Baldinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: Possible Algebra Pre-task Solution

  • Prove the following statement:

  • If the graphs of linear functions f(x) = ax + b and g(x) = cx + d intersect at a point P on the x-axis, the graph of their sum function (f + g)(x) must also go through P.

We are given that f(x) = ax + b and g(x) = cx + d. These two functions intersect at a point P on the x-axis. Define P as (p, 0).

The fact that the two functions intersect at point P implies that both contain (p, 0). In other words, f(p) = 0 and g(p) = 0.

To determine whether the sum function also passes through point P, we must consider (f + g)(x) and see if the value of the sum function at p is 0.

$$ \left(f+g\right)(p)=f(p)+g(p)\vspace*{-1pc} $$
$$\hspace*{1.7pc} =0+0 \vspace*{-1pc}$$
$$ \hspace*{.2pc}=0 $$

Since the sum function is defined as the sum of the value of the functions f and g at every point in the domain, we can calculate the value of the sum function at p as shown above. The fact that f and g contain (p, 0) guarantees that their sum also contains (p, 0). ■

Appendix 2: Possible Algebra Post-task Solution

Take a point (p, q) on the Cartesian plane. Reverse the coordinates to obtain a second point (q, p). Prove that on the line between these two points, the x-intercept and the y-intercept are the sum of the coordinates.

Consider the points (p, q) and (q, p) for p ≠ q. Then the equation of the line between the two points is:

$$\begin{array}{rrl} y-q&=&\frac{p-q}{q-p}\left(x-p\right)\\[6pt] y-q&=&\frac{p-q}{-\left(p-q\right)}\left(x-p\right)\\[6pt] y-q&=&-1\left(x-p\right)\\[6pt] y-q&=&-x+p\\[6pt] y&=&-x+p+q \end{array}$$

The y-intercept occurs when x = 0. Plugging in 0 for x gives:

$$ y=-0+p+q\vspace*{-1pc} $$
$$ =p+q $$

And so the y-intercept is the sum of the coordinates p and q.

Similarly, the x-intercept occurs when y = 0. Plugging in 0 for y gives:

$$ 0=-x+p+q\vspace*{-1pc} $$
$$ x=p+q $$

And so the x-intercept is the sum of the coordinates p and q.

If p = q, then (p, q) and (q, p) are the same point, and an infinite number of lines could pass through it. Thus the proposition stated in the problem holds only for p ≠ q. ■

Appendix 3: Tim’s Scratch Work and Formal Proof, Algebra Post-task

Scratch work

Formal work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baldinger, E.E. (2018). Learning Mathematical Practices to Connect Abstract Algebra to High School Algebra. In: Wasserman, N. (eds) Connecting Abstract Algebra to Secondary Mathematics, for Secondary Mathematics Teachers. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99214-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99214-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99213-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99214-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics