Skip to main content

A Framework for Assessing Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Fostering Creativity and Innovation
  • 835 Accesses

Abstract

The goal of an assessment is to identify the problems or opportunities that can be addressed through an evaluation. This chapter introduces the 4C Framework of Innovation Assessment to carry out an evaluation of an organization’s level of creativity and innovation. The assessment model includes four criteria: leadership, people, capability-building, and innovation outcomes. Each criterion is discussed in this chapter along with a case study. This chapter, thus, helps the reader understand what factors to address in order to leverage the results of innovation and to build enthusiasm for improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, P.K. 1998. Culture and Climate for Innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 1 (1): 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alecusan, A.M., and A. Dimitrescu. 2016. Innovation Management: The Past, Present and Future of the Market. Studies in Business and Economics 11 (3): 140–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, J., M.J. Marques, I. Saur, and P. Marques. 2007. Creativity and Innovation Through Multidisciplinary and Multisectoral Cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management 16 (1): 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alwis, R.S., and E. Hartmann. 2008. The Use of Tacit Knowledge Within Innovative Companies: Knowledge Management in Innovative Enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management 12 (1): 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T.M., R. Conti, H. Coon, J. Lazenby, and M. Herron. 1996. Assessing the Work Environment. Academy of Management 39 (5): 1154–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T.M., E.A. Schatzela, G.B. Monetaa, and S. Kramerb. 2004. Leader Behaviors and the Work Environment for Creativity: Perceived Leader Support. Leadership Quarterly 15 (1): 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T.A., and A. Veillette. 2008. Contextual Inhibitors of Employee Creativity in Organizations: The Insulating Role of Creative Ability. Group & Organization Management 34 (3): 330–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, K. 2008. Transferring Japanese Activities to Overseas Plants in China. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 28 (6): 518–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J.B., L. Aiman-smith, and J.E.F.B. Arthur. 2010. Gainsharing and Organizational Learning: Suggestions Over Time an Analysis of Employee. Management 44 (4): 737–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, C.M., D.J. Holman, K.L. Unsworth, T.D. WaU, and P.E. Waterson. 2000. Shop Floor Innovation: Facilitating the Suggestion and Implementation of Ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 73 (3): 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bantel, K.A., and S.E. Jackson. 1989. Top Management and Innovations in Banking: Does the Composition of the Top Team Make a Difference? Strategic Management Journal 10 (1): 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartol, K.M., and A. Srivastava. 2002. Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 9 (1): 64–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M., S.C. Voelpel, M. Leibold, and E.B. Tekie. 2005. Strategic Management as Organizational Learning: Developing Fit and Alignment Through a Disciplined Process. Long Range Planning 38: 445–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, L., and N. Ryzhkova. 2015. Managing Online User Co-creation in Service Innovation. In The Handbook of Service Innovation, ed. R. Agarwal, W. Selen, G. Roos, and R. Green. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, John, and Joe Tidd. 2007. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigliardi, B., and A.I. Dormio. 2009. An Empirical Investigation of Innovation Determinants in Food Machinery Enterprises. European Journal of Innovation Management 12 (2): 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binnewies, C., S. Ohly, and C. Niessen. 2008. The Interplay Between Job Resources, Age and Idea Creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology 23 (3): 437–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binnewies, C., S. Ohly, and S. Sonnentag. 2007. Taking Personal Initiative and Communicating About Ideas: What is Important for the Creative Process and for Idea Creativity? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 16 (4): 432–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugnar, N., L. Mester, and A. Fora. 2016. Innovation and International Competitiveness of a Country. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economics Science Series 25 (2): 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, C. 1998. Employee Creativity and Suggestion Systems Programs: An Empirical Study. Creativity and Innovation Management 7 (2): 62–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., R. Gelbard, and D. Gefen. 2010. The Importance of Innovation Leadership in Cultivating Strategic Fit and Enhancing Firm Performance. The Leadership Quarterly 21 (3): 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2006. In Search of Complementarity in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science 52: 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H.W. 2011. Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., and J.S. Choi. 2014. Dynamics of Innovation in Nonprofit Organizations: The Pathways from Innovativeness to Innovation Outcome. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance 38 (4): 360–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.M. 2009. Are We Having Fun Yet? Creating a Motivating Work Environment. Industrial and Commercial Training 41 (1): 43–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNBC. 2018. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/26/how-to-get-hired-at-amazon-google-and-other-top-companies.html

  • Czech Statistical Office. 2014. Innovation Activities of Enterprises in the Czech Republic During Year 2010–2012. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander, L., S. O’Mahony, and D.M. Gann. 2016. One Foot In, One Foot Out: How Does Individuals’ External Search Breadth Affect Innovation Outcomes? Strategic Management Journal 37 (2): 280–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, J.P.J., and D.N. Den Hartog. 2007. How Leaders Influence Employees’ Innovative Behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management 10 (1): 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, J., and D. Den Hartog. 2010. Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management 19 (1): 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A.J., A.E. Marx, and G. Wilson. 2008. Generating Ideas and Managing Suggestion Systems in Organisations: Some Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management 8 (4): 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M., D. Logue, and J. Schweitzer. 2015. Towards an Understanding of Open Innovation in Services: Beyond the Firm and Towards Relational Co-creation. In The Handbook of Service Innovation, ed. R. Agarwal, W. Selen, G. Roos, and R. Green, 75–90. London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, T.M. 2005. Factors Influencing Individual Creativity in the Workplace: An Examination of Quantitative Empirical Research. Advances in Developing Human Resources 7 (2): 160–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, S. 2010. Engaging Employees Through Whole Leadership. Strategic HR Review 9 (3): 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, C., and H. Grupp. 2005. Innovation in the Service Sector: The Demand for Service-Specific Innovation Measurement Concepts and Typologies. Research Policy 34: 517–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., and J. Farh. 2009. Employee Learning Orientation, Transformational Leadership, and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Employee Creative Self-Efficacy. Academy of Management Journal 52 (4): 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanama, D., and K. Nishikawa. 2017. Does an Extrinsic Reward for R&D Employees Enhance Innovation Outcomes? Evidence from a Japanese Innovation Survey. R&D Management 47 (2): 198–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempt, R.G.M., M. Folkeringa, J.P.J. De Jong, and E.F.M. Wubben. 2003. Innovation and Firm Performance (Research Report H200207). Netherlands: Panteia/EIM Business and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khairuzzaman, W., W. Ismail, and R. Abdmajid. 2007. Framework of the Culture of Innovation: A Revisit. Jurnal Kemanusiaan 9: 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, J. 2016. Factors Hampering Innovation Activities: Case Study from the Czech Republic. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 11 (4): 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madjar, N. 2008. Emotional and Informational Support from Different Sources and Employee Creativity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 81 (1): 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malaviya, P., and S. Wadhwa. 2005. Innovation Management in Organizational Context: An Empirical Study. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 6 (2): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maria Stock, R., N.A. Zacharias, and A. Schnellbaecher. 2017. How Do Strategy and Leadership Styles Jointly Affect Co-development and Its Innovation Outcomes? Journal of Product Innovation Management 34 (2): 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, A.E. 1995. Management Commitment for Successful Suggestion Systems. Work Study 44 (3): 16–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, L.D. 2005. Organizational Culture’s Influence on Creativity and Innovation: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources 7 (2): 226–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neagoe, L.N., and V.M. Klein. 2009. Employee Suggestion System (Kaizen Teian) the Bottom-Up Approach for Productivity Improvement. Control 10 (3): 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogueira Tomas, R., F. Pini Rosales, M. Otávio Batalha, and R. Lúcia Chicarelli Alcantara. 2014. Analyzing Effects of External Integration on Innovations Outcomes in Large and Non-large Brazilian Food Companies. British Food Journal 116 (6): 984–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, S. 2008. The Management and Consumption of Organisational Creativity. Journal of Consumer Marketing 25 (3): 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K. 2004. The Co-Creation of Value—Invited Commentary. Journal of Marketing 68 (1): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reychav, I., and R. Sharkie. 2010. Trust: An Antecedent to Employee Extra-Role Behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital 11 (2): 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietzschel, E.F., B.A. Nijstad, and W. Stroebe. 2010. The Selection of Creative Ideas After Individual Idea Generation: Choosing Between Creativity and Impact. British Journal of Psychology 101 (1): 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, T., M. Indulska, D. Geiger, and A. Korthaus. 2012. Idea Assessment in Open Innovation: A State of Practice. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Barcelona, Paper 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C.E., and L.L. Gilson. 2004. What Leaders Need to Know: A Review of Social and Contextual Factors That Can Foster or Hinder Creativity. The Leadership Quarterly 5 (1): 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C.E., J. Zhou, and G.R. Oldham. 2004. The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? Journal of Management 30 (6): 933–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toubia, O. 2006. Idea Generation, Creativity, and Incentives. Marketing Science 25 (5): 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, C., and J. Van den Ende. 2002. Suggestion System: Transferring Employee Creativity into Practicable Ideas. R&D Management 32 (5): 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verworn, B. 2009. Does Age Have an Impact on Having Ideas? An Analysis of the Quantity and Quality of Ideas Submitted to a Suggestion System. Creativity and Innovation Management 18 (4): 326–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyld, David C., and Robert Maurin. 2009. Keys to Innovation: The Right Measures and The Right Culture? The Academy of Management Perspectives 23 (2): 96–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, M.S., J.C. Prabhu, and R.K. Chandy. 2007. Managing the Future: CEO Attention and Innovation Outcomes. Journal of Marketing 71 (4): 84–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., and K.M. Bartol. 2010. Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement. Academy of Management Journal 53 (1): 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., and J. George. 2001. When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice. Academy of Management Journal 44 (4): 682–696.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flevy Lasrado .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lasrado, F. (2019). A Framework for Assessing Innovation. In: Fostering Creativity and Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99121-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics