Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Governance and Sustainable Urban Transport in the Americas pp 91–112Cite as

Conclusion on the Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 220 Accesses

Abstract

Mercier and his colleagues draw from the data on instrument use of the preceding chapter to offer some unusual and possibly innovative thoughts on the interaction between government and governance modes, two policy configurations usually seen as opposites. These two presumably opposing procedures are in fact tied together in a complex and back and forth movement of policy evolution, so that governance can even be seen as preparing and enhancing the process of proactive government. The authors then call upon notions of social sciences and economics to better understand their overall results. They find that continuity in transport policy is illuminated by the sociological notions of path dependency, historic and cognitive institutionalism, and culture, while the notion of isomorphism, the tendency to imitate successful organizations, can be called upon to explain some of the changes occurring in this policy area. The authors refrain from a prematurely normative-prescriptive position, by calling upon institutional economics to draw our attention to the transactions costs involved in the much-praised governance configuration of policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ardila-Gómez, A. (2004). Transit Planning in Curitiba and Bogotá. Roles in Interaction, Risk and Change (PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., Bartle, I., Flinders, M., & Marsden, G. (2015). Blame Game and Climate Change: Accountability, Multi-Level Governance and Carbon Management. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 17(1), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. R. (2013). If Mayors Ruled the World. Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouteligier, S. (2013). Cities, Networks, and Global Environmental Governance. Spaces of Innovation, Places of Leadership. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, C., & Low, N. (2012). Institutional Barriers to Sustainable Transport. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D., LaPorte, J., & Seawright, J. (2012). Putting Typologies to Work: Concept Formation, Measurement, and Analytic Rigor. Political Research Quarterly, 65(1), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions. KYKLOS, 47(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, C. (2005). Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics. International Organizations, 59(Spring), 293–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horak, M., & Young, R. (Eds.). (2012). Sites of Governance: Multilevel Governance and Policy Making in Canada’s Big Cities. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2014). From the ‘Old’ to the ‘New’ Policy Design: Design Thinking Beyond Markets and Collaborative Governance. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. (2003). Comparative Conclusions—“New” Environmental Policy Instruments: An Evolution or a Revolution in Environmental Policy? Environmental Politics, 12(1), 201–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. (2005). The Rise of “New” Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government? Political Studies, 53(3), 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., & Le Galès, P. (2010). Exploring Governance in a Multi-Level Polity: A Policy Instruments Approach. West European Politics, 33(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink, J., & Denaldi, R. (2012). Metropolitan Fragmentation and Neo-Localism in the Periphery. Revisiting the Case of Curitiba. Urban Studies, 49(3), 549–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, P. (2013). Overestimating the Shift from Government to Governance: Evidence from Swiss Metropolitan Areas. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 26(3), 397–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppell, J. (2005). Pathologies of Accountability. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P., & Sprague M. (1997). Federal Transportation Policy and the Role of Metropolitan Planning Organizations in California. Public Policy Institute of California. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California. http://web.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_497PLR.pdf. Accessed 13 February 2014.

  • Low, N., & Astle, R. (2009, March). Path Dependence in Urban Transport: An Institutional Analysis of Urban Passenger Transport in Melbourne, Australia 1956–2006. Transport Policy, 16(2), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, G., Mullen, C., Bache, I., Bartle, I., & Flinders, M. (2014). Carbon Reduction and Travel Behaviour: Discourses, Disputes and Contradictions in Governance. Transport Policy, 35(2014), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.05.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, T., & Crass, M. (2007). Sustainability in Transport. Implications for Policy Makers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2017-01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. Y., & Lee, J. H. (2009). Making Sense of Metropolitan Regions: A Dimensional Approach to Regional Governance. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 41(1), 126–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger, G., Kaufmann, V., Pattaroni, L., & Jemelin, C. (2009). How Does Urban Public Transport Change Cities? Correlations Between Past and Present Transport and Urban Planning Policies. Urban Studies, 46, 1421–1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Pose, A., Tomaney, J., & Klink, J. (2001). Local Empowerment Through Economic Restructuring in Brazil: The Case of the Greater ABC Region. Geoforum, 32(4), 459–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. (1988). An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2 and 3), 129–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (with collaboration of Elliot, O. V.). (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2000, November). The Contribution of the Economics of Information to the Twentieth Century Economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, G. (2011). Was Local Governance Such a Good Idea? A Global Comparative Perspective. Public Administration, 89(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, C., Zito, A. R., & Gale, F. (2012). Symposium Overview: Conceptualizing New Governance Arrangements. Public Administration, 90(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02003.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2013). What’s in a Name? Grasping New Public Governance as a Political-Administrative System. International Review of Public Administration, 18(2), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2013.10805250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, M., Rongerude, J., & Ansell, C. (2009). Collaboration Is Not Enough: Virtuous Cycles of Reform in Transportation Policy. Urban Affairs Review, 44(4), 455–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (2000, September). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada

    Jean Mercier

  2. École nationale d’administration publique, Québec, QC, Canada

    Fanny Tremblay-Racicot

  3. Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada

    Mario Carrier

  4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Fábio Duarte

Authors
  1. Jean Mercier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fanny Tremblay-Racicot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mario Carrier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fábio Duarte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Mercier .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mercier, J., Tremblay-Racicot, F., Carrier, M., Duarte, F. (2019). Conclusion on the Data. In: Governance and Sustainable Urban Transport in the Americas. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99091-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99091-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99090-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99091-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation