Skip to main content

Six Sigma and TQM

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Integrated Company-Wide Management System
  • 1645 Accesses

Abstract

For any manufacturing system, TQM and Six Sigma are important methodologies used for CI. Effective understanding of these methodologies and their relationship will provide an industry with a competitive edge. Many industrial organizations today are using either TQM or Six Sigma as the core for their process QI efforts. There is a lot of dispute on which methodology is superior, how they relate to each other, what the common grounds are, and what their differences are. As such, the relationship between TQM and Six Sigma is worth further investigation. In this chapter, a thorough comparison is introduced between the two methodologies. More particularly, this chapter investigates the similarities and differences of the two methodologies and how they relate to each other. Finally, this chapter introduces how TQM and Six Sigma fit together in order to develop a new structure for integrating them together which will provide an improved approach for CI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter is mainly prepared based on our published work:

    • Salah, S., Carretero, J. A., & Rahim, A. (2009). Six Sigma and Total Quality Management (TQM): Similarities, differences and relationship. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 5(3), 237–250.

References

  • Aly, N. A., Maytubby, V. J., & Elshennawy, A. K. (1990). Total quality management: An approach and a case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 19(1–4), 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R., Eriksson, H., & Torstensson, H. (2006). Similarities and differences between TQM, Six Sigma and Lean. The TQM Magazine, 18(3), 282–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J. (2004). Some pros and cons of Six Sigma: An academic perspective. The TQM Magazine, 16(4), 303–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J. (2006). Six Sigma for service processes. Business Process Management Journal, 12(2), 234–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnheiter, E. D., & Maleyeff, J. (2005). Research and concepts: The integration of Lean Management and Six Sigma. The TQM Magazine, 17(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banuelas, R., & Antony, J. (2002). Critical success factors for the successful implementation of Six Sigma projects in organizations. The TQM Magazine, 14(2), 92–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, R. (2004). Six-Sigma to operational excellence: Role of tools and techniques. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), 44–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan, N., & Baghel, A. (2005). An overview of continuous improvement: From the past to the present. Management Decision, 43(5), 761–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, K., & Revere, L. (2006). Six sigma arises from the ashes of TQM with a twist. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 19(3), 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buch, K. K., & Tolentino, A. (2006). Employee expectancies for Six Sigma success. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27(1), 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J.-L. (2008). Implementing Six Sigma via TQM improvement: An empirical study in Taiwan. The TQM Journal, 20(3), 182–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friday-Stroud, S. S., & Sutterfield, J. S. (2007). A conceptual framework for integrating Six-Sigma and strategic management methodologies to quantify decision making. The TQM Magazine, 19(6), 561–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, M. L. (2002). Lean Six Sigma, combining Six Sigma quality with Lean speed. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haikonen, A., Savolainen, T., & Jarvinen, P. (2004). Exploring Six Sigma and CI capability development: Preliminary case study findings on management role. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(4), 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnesk, R., & Abrahamsson, L. (2007). TQM: An act of balance between contradictions’. The TQM Magazine, 19(6), 531–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, R. (2004). One perspective on the future of Six-Sigma. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), 112–119.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Y. D. (2006). The practices of integrating manufacturing execution systems and Six Sigma methodology. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 31, 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jitpaiboon, T., & Rao, S. S. (2007). A meta-analysis of quality measures in manufacturing system. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24(1), 78–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klefsjo, B., Wiklund, H., & Edgeman, R. L. (2001). Six-Sigma seen as a methodology for total quality management. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(1), 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, Y. H., & Anbari, F. T. (2004). Benefits, obstacles and future of Six Sigma approach. Technovation, 26(5), 708–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D., & McAdam, R. (2004). Total quality management in strategy and operations: Dynamic grounded models. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(3), 254–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., & Choo, A. S. (2006). Six Sigma: The role of goals in improvement Teams. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 779–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J. M. (2002, January). The essential Six-Sigma. Quality Progress, 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maleyeff, J., & Kaminsky, F. C. (2002). Six Sigma and introductory statistics education. Education + Training, 44(2), 82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. (2001). Introduction to statistical quality control. New York, NY: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Motwani, J., Kumar, A., & Antony, J. (2004). A business process change framework for examining the implementation of Six Sigma: A case study of Dow Chemicals. The TQM Magazine, 16(4), 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proudlove, N., Moxham, C., & Boaden, R. (2008, February). Lessons for Lean in healthcare from using Six Sigma in the NHS. Public Money and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj, R. (2014). Quality improvement tool Six Sigma: A literature review. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Science Technology & Engineering, 3(3), 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricondo, I., & Viles, E. (2005). Six Sigma and its links to TQM, BPR, Lean and the learning organization. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(3), 323–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, R. G., Linderman, K., Liedtke, C., & Choo, A. S. (2008). Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 536–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 785–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, P., Navarro, D., Silvers, R., Keyes, V., & Dixon, D. (2002). The black belt memory jogger. Salem: Goal/QPC and Six Sigma Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snee, R. D. (2004). Six-Sigma: The evolution of a 100 years of business improvement methodology. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snee, R. D. (2007). Methods for business improvement—What is on the horizon? ASQ Statistics Division Newsletter, 13(2), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannock, J. D. T., Balogun, O., & Hawisa, H. (2007). A variation management system supporting Six Sigma. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(5), 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terziovski, M. (2006). Quality management practices and their relationship with customer satisfaction and productivity improvement. Management Research News, 29(7), 414–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upton, M. T., & Cox, C. (2008). Lean Six Sigma: A fusion of Pan–Pacific process improvement. Six Sigma quality resources for achieving Six Sigma results. Unpublished document. Retrieved March 7, from http://www.isixsigma.com/library/downloads/LeanSixSigma.pdf.

  • Voros, J. (2006). Production, manufacturing and logistics: The dynamics of price, quality and productivity improvement decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 170, 809–823.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C.-C. (2004). An integrated model of TQM and GE-Six Sigma. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), 97–111.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zivaljevic, A., Trifunovic, D., & Pejovic, B. (2016). Two quality evolutions: Industry vs. health care. Megatrend Review, 13(1), 159–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Souraj Salah .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Salah, S., Rahim, A. (2019). Six Sigma and TQM. In: An Integrated Company-Wide Management System. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99034-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99034-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99033-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99034-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics