Abstract
In this chapter we describe a high throughput phenotyping system that we have developed for raspberry and other soft fruit crops and its application to against individual (water stress regimes, vine weevil and Phytophthora root rot) and combined stresses. The term phenotype is used to describe the morphology, physiology, biochemistry and ontogeny of a plant, encompassing the diverse array of traits that contribute to the plant’s functional form. Plant phenotype is expressed as a consequence of the interaction between the plant genetic background (i.e. genotype) and the biotic and abiotic conditions experienced by the plant in its growing environment. A key focus of raspberry and other crop breeding is to understand the genetic control of desirable plant traits and the influence of environmental conditions on trait expression, which relies on the ability to collect quantitative information on target traits across genetically-characterised populations of plants. The process of characterising plant traits in detail, referred to as plant phenotyping, is a major challenge when relating plant genetic information to traits for plants in realistic growing environments. Advances in genetics and genomics methods in raspberry including high throughput DNA sequencing which has provided a new GbS linkage map and genome scaffolds, developments in microarray and RNA seq data and data analysis tools have provided large amounts of detailed information on raspberry. There is, however, a lack of corresponding methodology for high throughput plant phenotyping, which limits the quantity of available trait information, and creates a bottleneck in raspberry and other crop breeding (Fahlgren et al. 2015; Pauli et al. 2016a, b). The key factor in understanding traits at a genetic level is an ability to accurately phenotype. The main limitation is the significant effort and complexity of measurements, depending on trait, required to capture phenotyping data from plants grown in relevant environments – i.e. field conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altangerel N et al (2017) In vivo diagnostics of early abiotic plant stress response via Raman spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:3393–3396
Baldridge AM, Hook SJ, Grove CI, Rivera G (2009) The ASTER spectral library version 2.0. Remote Sens Environ 113:711–715
Chapman SC et al (2014) Pheno-copter: a low altitude, autonomous remote-sensing robotic helicopter for high-throughput field-based phenotyping. Agronomy 4:279–301
Chen D, Neumann K, Friedel S, Kilian B, Chen M, Altmann T, Klukas C (2014) Dissecting the phenotypic components of crop plant growth and drought responses based on high-throughput image analysis. Plant Cell 26:4636–4655
Deery D, Jimenez-Berni J, Sirault XRR, Jones HG, Furbank RT (2014) Proximal remote sensing buggies and potential applications for phenotyping. Agronomy 4:349–379
Deery D, James R, Rebetzke GJ (2016a) The potential value of canopy temperature for commercial wheat breeding. Report developed through grant CSP00148 for the Grains Research and Development Corporation, Australia
Deery D et al (2016b) Methodology for high-throughput field phenotyping of canopy temperature using airborne thermography. Front Plant Sci 7:1808
European plant phenoyping network (2018) About_EMPHASIS. https://emphasis.plant-phenotyping.eu/. Accessed 7 May 2018
Fahlgren N, Gehan MA, Baxter I (2015) Lights, camera, action: high-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up. Curr Opin Plant Biol 24:93–99
Fiorani F, Schurr U (2013) Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:17.11–17.25
Furbank RT, Tester M (2011) Phenomics – technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends Plant Sci 16:635–644
Gehan MA et al (2017) PlantCV v2: image analysis software for high-throughput plant phenotyping. PeerJ 5:e4088. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4088
Ghanem ME, Marrou H, Sinclair TR (2015) Physiological phenotyping of plants for crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci 20:139–144
Goggin FL, Lorence A, Topp CN (2015) Applying high-throughput phenotyping to plant–insect interactions: picturing more resistant crops. Curr Opin Insect Sci 9:69–76
Hawkesford MJ, Lorence A (2017) Plant phenotyping: increasing throughput and precision at multiple scales. Funct Plant Biol 44:v–vii
Hosoi F, Omasa K (2009) Estimating vertical plant area density profile and growth parameters of a wheat canopy at different growth stages using three-dimensional portable lidar imaging. ISPRS J Photogramm Rem Sens 64:151–158
Jones HG (2004) Application of thermal imaging and infrared sensing in plant physiology and ecophysiology. Adv Bot Res 41:107–163
Jones HG (2014) Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jones HG, Vaughan RA (2010) Remote sensing of vegetation: principles, techniques, and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Klukas C, Chen D, Pape JM (2014) Integrated analysis platform: an open-source information system for high-throughput plant phenotyping. Plant Physiol 165:506–518
Kolber Z, Klimov D, Ananyev G, Rascher U, Berry J, Osmond BA (2005) Measuring photosynthetic parameters at a distance: laser induced fluorescence transient (LIFT) method for remote measurements of photosynthesis in terrestrial vegetation. Photosynth Res 84:121–129
Leister D, Varotto C, Pesaresi P, Niwergall A, Salamini F (1999) Large-scale evaluation of plant growth in Arabidopsis thaliana by non-invasive image analysis. Plant Physiol Biochem 37:671–678
Lobet G (2017) Image analysis in plant sciences: Publish Then Perish. Trends Plant Sci 22:559–566
Lobet G, Draye X, Périlleux C (2013) An online database for plant image analysis software tools. Plant Methods 9:38
Meroni M, Rossini M, Guanter L, Alonso L, Rascher U, Colombo R, Moreno J (2009) Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Review of methods and applications. Remote Sens Environ 113:2037–2051
Pauli D et al (2016a) Field-based high-throughput plant phenotyping reveals the temporal patterns of quantitative Trait Loci Associated with Stress-Responsive Traits in Cotton. G3 (Bethesda) 6:865–879
Pauli D, Chapman SC, Bart R, Topp CN, Lawrence-Dill CJ, Poland J, Gore MA (2016b) The quest for understanding phenotypic variation via integrated approaches in the field environment. Plant Physiol 172:622–634
Sankaran S et al (2015) Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: a review. Eur J Agron 70:112–123
Walter A, Liebisch F, Hund A (2015) Plant phenotyping: from bean weighing to image analysis. Plant Methods 11:14
Williams D et al (2017) A method for automatic segmentation and splitting of hyperspectral images of raspberry plants collected in field conditions. Plant Methods 13:74
Yang W et al (2014) Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice. Nat Commun 5:5087
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, D., Aitkenhead, M., Karley, A.J., Graham, J., Jones, H.G. (2018). Use of Imaging Technologies for High Throughput Phenotyping. In: Graham, J., Brennan, R. (eds) Raspberry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99031-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99031-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99030-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99031-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)