Skip to main content

Simulation Modalities for Obstetrics and Gynecology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Obstetrics and Gynecology

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

  • 703 Accesses

Abstract

Various simulation modalities exist for healthcare training, many of which can be applied to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. From low-fidelity box trainers to highly sophisticated mannequins and robotic trainers, learners can benefit from a wide range of teaching approaches, and these modalities can be used at all levels of training. Combining certain trainers into a hybrid model allows instructors to utilize the most beneficial aspects of distinct modalities to provide a better teaching environment. Despite the successes in decreasing medical errors and improving teamwork and communication, simulation remains difficult to implement on a global scale due to barriers including cost and protected time for learners and instructors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Daniels K, Auguste T. Moving forward in patient safety: multidisciplinary team training. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37(3):146–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Levine A, De Maria S Jr, Schwartz A, Sim A. The comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. New York: Springer; 2014. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deering S, Auguste T, Lockrow E. Obstetric simulation for medical student, resident, and fellow education. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37(3):143–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Macedonia CR, Gherman RB, Satin AJ. Simulation laboratories for training in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:388–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deering SH, Hodor J, Wylen M, Poggi S, Nielsen P, Satin AJ. Additional training with an obstetric simulator improves medical student comfort with basic procedures. Simul Healthc. 2006;1(1):32–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jude DC, Gilbert GG, Magrane D. Simulation training in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(5):1489–92. Epub 2006 Jul 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nitsche JF, Shumard KM, Fino NF, Denney JM, Quinn KH, Bailey JC, Jijon R, Huang C, Kesty K, Whitecar PW, Grandis AS, Brost BC. Effectiveness of labor cervical examination simulation in medical student education. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(Suppl 4):13S–20S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dayal AK, Fisher N, Magrane D, Goffman D, Bernstein PS, Katz NT. Simulation training improves medical students’ learning experiences when performing real vaginal deliveries. Simul Healthc. 2009;4(3):155–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scholz C, Mann C, Kopp V, Kost B, Kainer F, Fischer MR. High-fidelity simulation increases obstetric self-assurance and skills in undergraduate medical students. J Perinat Med. 2012;40(6):607–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher N, Bernstein PS, Satin A, Pardanani S, Heo H, Merkatz IR, Goffman D. Resident training for eclampsia and magnesium toxicity management: simulation or traditional lecture? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):379.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Aug 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deering S, Poggi S, Macedonia C, Gherman R, Satin AJ. Improving resident competency in the management of shoulder dystocia with simulation training. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:1224–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiely DJ, Stephanson K, Ross S. Assessing image quality of low-cost laparoscopic box trainers: options for residents training at home. Simul Healthc. 2011;6(5):292–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Winkel AF, Gillespie C, Uquillas K, Zabar S, Szyld D. Assessment of developmental progress using an objective structured clinical examination-simulation hybrid examination for obstetrics and gynecology residents. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(2):230–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang E. The role of simulation training in obstetrics: a healthcare training strategy dedicated to performance improvement. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;25(6):482–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Draycott TJ, Crofts JF, Ash JP, et al. Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Phipps MG, Lindquist DG, McConaughey E, et al. Outcomes from a labor and delivery team training program with simulation component. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(1):3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pratt S, Mann S, Salisbury M, et al. Impact of CRM-based team training in obstetric outcomes and clinician patient safety attitudes. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33:720–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Newmark J, Dandolu V, Milner R, Grewal H, Harbison S, Hernandez E. Correlating virtual reality and box trainer tasks in the assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(5):546.e1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Botden SM, Torab F, Buzink SN, Jakimowicz JJ. The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(5):1214–22. Epub 2007 Oct 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burden C, Oestergaard J, Larsen CR. Integration of laparoscopic virtual-reality simulation into gynaecology training. BJOG. 2011;118(Suppl 3):5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, et al. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;338:61802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD006575.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ballantyne GH, Moll F. The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and the telepresence surgery. Surg Clin N Am. 2003;83(6):1293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schreuder HW, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, Schijven MP, Verheijen RH. Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. BJOG. 2012;119(2):137–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03139.x. Epub 2011 Oct 10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nitsche JF, Brost BC. A cervical cerclage task trainer for maternal-fetal medicine fellows and obstetrics/gynecology residents. Simul Healthc. 2012;7(5):321–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America/ National Academies Press (US); 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eppich W, Howard V, Vozenilek J, Curran I. Simulation-based team training in healthcare. Simul Healthc. 2011;6(Suppl):S14–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Higgins, E., Auguste, T.C. (2019). Simulation Modalities for Obstetrics and Gynecology. In: Deering, S., Auguste, T., Goffman, D. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Obstetrics and Gynecology. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98995-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98995-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98994-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98995-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics