Skip to main content

Disembodied Senior Managers: The Perspective of Male Senior Managers in an Australian Hospitality Organisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diversity, Affect and Embodiment in Organizing

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the underrepresentation of women in senior management positions in one Australian organisation. The study is theoretically informed by Joan Acker’s concept of the “disembodied worker”, which she defines as an unencumbered worker who is totally dedicated to work and with no responsibilities for family care. The characteristics of the “disembodied worker” are abstract and neutral in the organisational text; however, some authors have suggested that it resembles male rather than female workers. This study draws on semi-structured interviews with nine male senior managers in one hospitality organisation (called Hospitality) in Australia and uses a critical social constructivist philosophy and feminist lens. This chapter addresses the following questions: How do men in senior positions (re)construct the ideal candidate for managerial position and how do their own experiences shape this construction? The interviews revealed that while organisations are defined as sex-neutral, a specific masculine image of the “disembodied worker” exists which continuously (re)constructs and reinforces the masculine image of senior roles which makes men seem more legitimate as leaders than women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acker, J. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society 4 (2): 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Gendered institutions – From sex-roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews 21 (5): 565–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. The gender regime of Swedish banks. Scandinavian Journal of Management 10 (2): 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006a. The gender regime of Swedish banks. Scandinavian Journal of Management 22 (3): 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006b. Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society 20 (4): 441–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. From glass ceiling to inequality regimes. Sociologie du travail 51: 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion 31 (3): 214–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J., and D.R.V. Houten. 1974. Differential recruitment and control: The sex structuring of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 19 (2): 152–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benschop, Y. 2009. The micro-politics of gendering in networking. Gender, Work and Organization 16 (2): 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benschop, Y., and H. Doorewaard. 1998a. Covered by equality: The gender subtext of organizations. Organization Studies 19 (5): 787–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998b. Six of one and half a dozen of the other: The gender subtext of Taylorism and team-based work. Gender, Work and Organization 5 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Gender subtext revisited. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion 31 (3): 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benschop, Y., J.H. Mills, A. Mills, and J. Tienari. 2012. Editorial: Gendering change: The next step. Gender, Work and Organization 19 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00580.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billing, Y.D. 2011. Are women in management victims of the phantom of the male norm? Gender, Work and Organization 18 (3): 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00546.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbridge, A., and J. Hearn. 2008. Gender and management: New directions in research and continuing patterns in practice. British Journal of Management 19 (1): S38–S49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1990[1999]. Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli, L.L., and A.H. Eagly. 2001. Gender, hierarchy, and leadership: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues 57 (4): 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, N. 2014. Doing gender, practising politics: Workplace cultures in local and devolved government. Gender, Work and Organization 21 (4): 368–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, D.L., and J. Hearn. 1996. Men as managers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities and management. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W. 1987. Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford/Cambridge/Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., and Y.S. Lincoln. 2000. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. 2004. From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory 5 (1): 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M.E. 1983. Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues 57 (4): 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. 1976. The impact of hierarchical structures on the work behavior of women and men. Social Problems 23 (4): 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., and C.A. Clarke. 2014. It’s a bittersweet symphony, this life: Fragile selves and insecure identities at work. Organization Studies 35 (3): 335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., and M. Tullberg. 2012. Managing masculinity/mismanaging the corporation. Organization 19 (4): 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P., and R. Simpson. 2012. Kanter revisited: Gender, power and (in)visibility. International Journal of Management Reviews 14: 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y.S., and N.K. Denzin. 2003. Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief. Vol. 2. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P.Y. 2006. Practising gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender, Work and Organization 13 (3): 254–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paludi, M.A. 2013. Women and management : Global issues and promising solution/Volume I: Degrees of challenge. Santa Barbara: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, J.K. 2008. Gender in management: Theorizing gender as heterogender. British Journal of Management 19 (s1): S110–S119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, A., and D. Knights. 2007. Editorial: Undoing gender: Organizing and disorganizing performance. Gender, Work and Organization 14 (6): 505–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C.L. 2011. Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, G., J. Burgess, and E. French. 2009a. Managing diversity in Australia: Theory and practice. North Ryde: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, G., E. French, and J. Burgess. 2009b. Equity and diversity within organisations: Putting policy into practice. In Managing diversity in Australia: Theory and practice. North Ryde: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S. 2013. Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Chichester: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, M., and Y. Benschop. 2012. Slaying the seven-headed dragon: The quest for gender change in academia. Gender, Work and Organization 19 (1): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00566.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, M., and L. Stobbe. 2014. The support paradox: Overcoming dilemmas in gender equality programs. Scandinavian Journal of Management 30: 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. 1999. Managing like a men: Women and men in corporate management. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahan Poorhosseinzadeh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Poorhosseinzadeh, M., Strachan, G., Broadbent, K. (2019). Disembodied Senior Managers: The Perspective of Male Senior Managers in an Australian Hospitality Organisation. In: Fotaki, M., Pullen, A. (eds) Diversity, Affect and Embodiment in Organizing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98917-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics