Skip to main content

Efficacy of High-Fidelity Patient Simulation in Nursing Education: Research Protocol of ‘S4NP’ Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 597 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 804))

Abstract

High-Fidelity Patient Simulation is defined as a replicated clinical experience in a controlled learning environment that closely represents reality. This learning method creates the opportunity for students to gain specific and fundamental clinical skills in a controlled, safe, and forgiving environment. Even though the available evidence shows the impact of High-Fidelity Patient Simulation in improving nursing students’ learning objectives, several reasons do not allow confirming its effectiveness. Many studies show weakness in validity and reliability due to the low quality of study design, inadequate sample size and/or convenience sample recruitment. Furthermore, most studies appear uneven in research methods and unstable in outcome measurements. Finally, little is known about learning outcome retention. Therefore, high-level studies are required to strongly confirm the impact of High-Fidelity Patient Simulation on students’ learning outcomes, especially on long-term retention, and on patients’ advantages. This trial project, called S4NP (Simulation for Nursing Practice), was designed to confirm if the nursing students’ exposure to complementary training based on High-Fidelity Patient Simulation could produce long-term beneficial effects on learning outcomes compared to the traditional training program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lewis, R., Strachan, A., Smith, M.M.: Is high fidelity simulation the most effective method for the development of non-technical skills in nursing? A review of the current evidence. Open Nurs. J. 6, 82–89 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cant, R.P., Cooper, S.J.: Simulation-based learning in nurse education: systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 66(1), 3–15 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Helyer, R., Dickens, P.: Progress in the utilization of high-fidelity simulation in basic science education. J. Adv. Nurs. 40(2), 143–144 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cannon-Diehl, M.R.: Simulation in healthcare and nursing: state of the science. Crit. Care Nurs. Q. 32(2), 128–136 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Decker, S., Sportsman, S., Puetz, L., Billings, L.: The evolution of simulation and its contribution to competency. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 39(2), 74–80 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Petrucci, C., La Cerra, C., Caponnetto, V., Franconi, I., Gaxhja, E., Rubbi, I., Lancia, L.: Literature-based analysis of the potentials and the limitations of using simulation in nursing education. In: Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, pp. 57–64. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pittman, O.A.: The use of simulation with advanced practice nursing students. J. Am. Assoc. Nurse Pract. 24(9), 516–520 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yuan, H.B., Williams, B.A., Fang, J.B., Ye, Q.H.: A systematic review of selected evidence on improving knowledge and skills through high-fidelity simulation. Nurse Educ. Today 32(3), 294–298 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vincent, M.A., Sheriff, S., Mellott, S.: The efficacy of high-fidelity simulation on psychomotor clinical performance improvement of undergraduate nursing students. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 33(2), 78–84 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolf, Z.R., Hicks, R., Serembus, J.F.: Characteristics of medication errors made by students during the administration phase: a descriptive study. J. Prof. Nurs. 22(1), 39–51 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dante, A., Natolini, M., Graceffa, G., Zanini, A., Palese, A.: The effects of mandatory preclinical education on exposure to injuries as reported by Italian nursing students: a 15-year case–control, multicentre study. J. Clin. Nurs. 23(5–6), 900–904 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Petrucci, C., Alvaro, R., Cicolini, G., Cerone, M.P., Lancia, L.: Percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposures in nursing students: an Italian observational study. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 41(4), 337–343 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cicolini, G., Di Labio, L., Lancia, L.: Prevalence of biological exposure among nursing students: an observational study. Prof. Inf. 61(4), 217–222 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts, D., Greene, L.: The theatre of high-fidelity simulation education. Nurse Educ. Today 31(7), 694–698 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Warren, J.N., Luctkar-Flude, M., Godfrey, C., Lukewich, J.: A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation-based education on satisfaction and learning outcomes in nurse practitioner programs. Nurse Educ. Today 46, 99–108 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Byrd, J.F., Pampaloni, F., Wilson, L.: Hybrid simulation. In: Human Simulation for Nursing and Health Professions, pp. 267–271. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haut, C., Fey, M.K., Akintade, B., Klepper, M.: Using high-fidelity simulation to teach acute care pediatric nurse practitioner students. J. Nurse Pract. 10(10), e87–e91 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scherer, Y.K., Bruce, S.A., Runkawatt, V.: A comparison of clinical simulation and case study presentation on nurse practitioner students’ knowledge and confidence in managing a cardiac event. Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh. 4(1) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kardong-Edgren, S.: Striving for higher levels of evaluation in simulation. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 6(6), e203–e204 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rutherford-Hemming, T.: Learning in simulated environments: effect on learning transfer and clinical skill acquisition in nurse practitioner students. J. Nurs. Educ. 51(7), 403–406 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shin, S., Park, J.-H., Kim, J.-H.: Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis. Nurse Educ. Today 35(1), 176–182 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zulkosky, K.: Self-efficacy: a concept analysis. Nurs. Forum 44(2), 93–102 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Perry, P.: Concept analysis: confidence/self-confidence. Nurs. Forum 46(4), 218–230 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robb, Y., Dietert, C.: Measurement of clinical performance of nurses: a literature review. Nurse Educ. Today 22(4), 293–300 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garside, J.R., Nhemachena, J.Z.: A concept analysis of competence and its transition in nursing. Nurse Educ. Today 33(5), 541–545 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hunt, D.P.: The concept of knowledge and how to measure it. J. Intellect. Cap. 4(1), 100–113 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lancia, L., Petrucci, C., Giorgi, F., Dante, A., Cifone, M.G.: Academic success or failure in nursing students: results of a retrospective observational study. Nurse Educ. Today 33(12), 1501–1505 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dante, A., Petrucci, C., Lancia, L.: European nursing students’ academic success or failure: a post-Bologna Declaration systematic review. Nurse Educ. Today 33(1), 46–52 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Department of Life, Health, and Environmental Sciences: Didactic regulation of Bachelor Degree in Nursing Science in academic year 2017/2018

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ronaldson, S., Adamson, J., Dyson, L., Torgerson, D.: Waiting list randomized controlled trial within a case-finding design: methodological considerations. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 20(5), 601–605 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cunningham, J.A., Kypri, K., McCambridge, J.: Exploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 13(1), 150 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shrier, I., Steele, R.J., Verhagen, E., Herbert, R., Riddell, C.A., Kaufman, J.S.: Beyond intention to treat: what is the right question? Clin. Trials 11(1), 28–37 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sedgwick, P.: Intention to treat analysis versus per protocol analysis of trial data. BMJ 350, 681 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wassertheil-Smoller, S., Kim, M.Y.: Statistical analysis of clinical trials. Semin. Nucl. Med. 40(5), 357–363 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gazzetta Ufficiale no. 174 of 29 July 2003 - Supplement no. 123, (2003) Personal Data Protection Code - Legislative Decree no. 196 of 30 June 2003

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelo Dante .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dante, A. et al. (2019). Efficacy of High-Fidelity Patient Simulation in Nursing Education: Research Protocol of ‘S4NP’ Randomized Controlled Trial. In: Di Mascio, T., et al. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 8th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 804. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98872-6_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics