Advertisement

Impact of an Electronic Nursing Documentation System on the Nursing Process Accuracy

  • Fabio D’Agostino
  • Valentina Zeffiro
  • Antonello Cocchieri
  • Mariangela Vanalli
  • Davide Ausili
  • Ercole Vellone
  • Maurizio Zega
  • Rosaria Alvaro
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 804)

Abstract

While the nursing process provides a framework for documenting nursing practice and delivering patient-focused care, nurses often have difficulty applying the nursing process in clinical practice. Fortunately, electronic nursing documentation using clinical decision support systems (END-CDSS) can improve the accuracy of recorded nursing process. To date, however, no study has evaluated nursing documentation accuracy over time following END-CDSS implementation. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate if the Professional Assessment Instrument (PAI) END-CDSS improved the accuracy of nursing documentation in an Italian hospital cardiology inpatient unit. A quasi-experimental longitudinal design was conducted. A random sample of 120 nursing documentations was collected and evaluated using the D-Catch instrument. A significant improvement (p < .001) in nursing documentation accuracy scores was shown after PAI implementation. These results suggest that an END-CDSS can support nurses in the nursing process by improving their clinical reasoning skills.

Keywords

Nursing documentation accuracy Nursing process Electronic nursing documentation Clinical decision support system Longitudinal design 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Italian Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Rome, Italy.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Peres, H.H., de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz, D., Lima, A.F., Gaidzinski, R.R., Ortiz, D.C., Mendes e Trindade, M., Tsukamoto, R., Batista de Oliveira, N.: Conceptualization of an electronic system for documentation of nursing diagnosis, outcomes, and intervention. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 160, 279–283 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perez Rivas, F.J., Martin-Iglesias, S., Pacheco del Cerro, J.L., Minguet Arenas, C., Garcia Lopez, M., Beamud Lagos, M.: Effectiveness of nursing process use in primary care. Int. J. Nurs. Know. 27, 43–48 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Darmer, M.R., Ankersen, L., Nielsen, B.G., Landberger, G., Lippert, E., Egerod, I.: Nursing documentation audit–the effect of a VIPS implementation programme in Denmark. J. Clin. Nurs. 15, 525–534 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, N., Hailey, D., Yu, P.: Quality of nursing documentation and approaches to its evaluation: a mixed-method systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 67, 1858–1875 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paans, W., Sermeus, W., Nieweg, R.M., van der Schans, C.P.: Prevalence of accurate nursing documentation in patient records. J. Adv. Nurs. 66, 2481–2489 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tuinman, A., de Greef, M.H.G., Krijnen, W.P., Paans, W., Roodbol, P.F.: Accuracy of documentation in the nursing care plan in long-term institutional care. Geriatr. Nurs. 38, 578–583 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paans, W., Nieweg, R.M., van der Schans, C.P., Sermeus, W.: What factors influence the prevalence and accuracy of nursing diagnoses documentation in clinical practice? A systematic literature review. J. Clin. Nurs. 20, 2386–2403 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayrinen, K., Lammintakanen, J., Saranto, K.: Evaluation of electronic nursing documentation–nursing process model and standardized terminologies as keys to visible and transparent nursing. Int. J. Med. Inform. 79, 554–564 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D’Agostino, F., Vellone, E., Tontini, F., Zega, M., Alvaro, R.: Development of a computerized system using standard nursing language for creation of a nursing minimum data set. Professioni infermieristiche 65, 103–109 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zega, M., D’Agostino, F., Bowles, K.H., De Marinis, M.G., Rocco, G., Vellone, E., Alvaro, R.: Development and validation of a computerized assessment form to support nursing diagnosis. Int. J. Nurs. Knowl. 25, 22–29 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanson, G., Alvaro, R., Cocchieri, A., Vellone, E., Welton, J., Maurici, M., Zega, M., D’Agostino, F.: Nursing diagnoses, interventions, and activities as described by a nursing minimum data set: a prospective study in an oncology hospital setting. Cancer Nurs., 13 March 2018, [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000581
  13. 13.
    D’Agostino, F., Barbaranelli, C., Paans, W., Belsito, R., Juarez Vela, R., Alvaro, R., Vellone, E.: Psychometric evaluation of the D-Catch, an instrument to measure the accuracy of nursing documentation. Int. J. Nurs. Knowl. 28, 145–152 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paans, W., Sermeus, W., Nieweg, R.M., van der Schans, C.P.: D-Catch instrument: development and psychometric testing of a measurement instrument for nursing documentation in hospitals. J. Adv. Nurs. 66, 1388–1400 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dunn, O.J.: Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6, 241–252 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D’Agostino, F., Zeffiro, V., Vellone, E., Ausili, D., Belsito, R., Leto, A., Alvaro, R.: Cross-mapping of nursing care terms recorded in italian hospitals into the standardized NNN terminology. Int. J. Nurs. Knowl., 12 Jan 2018, [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12200

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio D’Agostino
    • 1
  • Valentina Zeffiro
    • 1
  • Antonello Cocchieri
    • 2
  • Mariangela Vanalli
    • 1
  • Davide Ausili
    • 3
  • Ercole Vellone
    • 1
  • Maurizio Zega
    • 2
  • Rosaria Alvaro
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Rome Tor VergataRomeItaly
  2. 2.University Hospital Agostino GemelliRomeItaly
  3. 3.University of Milan BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations