Advertisement

Using “The Staged Cocktail Party” to Improve Leaders’ Social Interaction in the Norwegian Military

  • Kristian FiringEmail author
  • Kåre Inge Skarsvåg
  • Tatiana Chemi
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities book series (PSBAH)

Abstract

The authors present an intimate experience from leader development at theThe Royal Norwegian Air Force Academy. Focusing on the core of military leadership—“solve the mission and take care of your people”—the Social Interaction element in this context is explored in this chapter. Surprisingly, however, this competence is not explored by using regular military exercises, but by using a Staged Cocktail Party associated with arts-based traditions such as theatre, drama and play. The authors, acting as mentors when conducting The Staged Cocktail Party, explore the following potential implications: human interaction, emotional reactions and leaders’ mentalisation. They also share some valuable lessons learned about the investigated arts-based methodology. Finally, the authors surprise the reader with a statement highly relevant to the military context and beyond.

Keywords

playPlay Olemic Agent Epistemological Tool Experience-based Learning Social Intelligence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adler, N. J. (2011). Leading Beautifully: The Creative Economy and Beyond. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(3), 208–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2014). The Experience of Learning in Space and Time. Prometheus, 32(1), 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts Based Research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bartone, P. T., Snook, S. A., Forsythe, G. B., Lewis, P., & Bullis, R. C. (2007). Psychosocial Development and Leader Performance of Military Officer Cadets. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 490–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgarten, A. G. (1735). Reflections on Poetry. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/reflectionsonpoe030202mbp/reflectionsonpoe030202mbp_djvu.txt.
  6. Boal, A. (2000). Theater of the Oppressed. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bolton, G. M. (1984). Drama as Education: An Argument for Placing Drama at the Centre of the Curriculum. Brunt Mill, Harlow: Longman Higher Education.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, E. (1994). The Importance of Belgrade TiE. SCYPT Journal, 27, 36–38.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Buber, M. (1996). I and Thou. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  11. Chemi, T. (2017). A Safe Haven for Emotional Experiences: Learning Perspectives on Participation in the Arts. In T. Chemi, S. G. Davy, & B. Lund (Eds.), Innovative Pedagogy. A Recognition of Emotions and Creativity in Education (pp. 9–26). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Chemi, T. (2018). A Theatre Laboratory Approach to Pedagogy and Creativity: Odin Teatret and Group Learning. Switzerland: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chemi, T., & Du, X. (2018). Arts-Based Methods and Organisational Learning: Higher Education Around the World. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, C. (2013). The Imagination in Action. TIE and Its Relationship to Drama in Educatin Today. In A. Jackson & C. Vine (Eds.), Learning Through Theatre (pp. 41–59). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Rationality and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. (1961). Democracy and Education. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Dewey, J. (1980). Art as Experience. New York: Berkley Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and Education. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Eisner, E. (2008). Art and Knowledge. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues (pp. 3–12). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Firing, K. (2004). “Prøver å forstå litt mer i stedet for å være så sinna”. En kasusstudie om skriving som refleksjonsform ved Luftkrigsskolen [“Trying to Understand a Little More Instead of Being so Angry”. A Case Study of Writing as a form of Reflection at the Air Force Academy]. Trondheim: Tapir akademiske forlag.Google Scholar
  21. Firing, K., & Laberg, J. C. (2010). Training for the Unexpected: How Reflection Transforms Hard Action into Learning Experiences. In P. T. Bartone, B. H. Johnsen, J. Eid, J. M. Violanti, & J. C. Laberg (Eds.), Enhancing Human Performance in Security Operations: International and Law Enforcement Perspectives (pp. 229–244). Washington, DC: Charles C. Thomas Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Firing, K., Fauskevåg, O., & Skarsvåg, K. I. (2018). Theatre in Military Education: Play and Reality. In T. Chemi & X. Du (Eds.), Arts-Based Methods and Organisational Learning: Higher Education Around the World. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Fleming, M. (2012). The Arts in Education: An Introduction to Aesthetics, Theory and Pedagogy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect Regulation, Mentalization and the Development of the Self. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method. London: Continium.Google Scholar
  26. Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2005). Can You See the Real Me? A Self-Based Model of Authentic Leader and Follower Development. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gillham, G. (1994). What Is TiE? SCYPT Journal, 27(4–12).Google Scholar
  29. Goffman, E. (1990). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  30. Goleman, D. (2006a). Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  31. Goleman, D. (2006b). Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  32. Heathcote, D., & Bolton, G. (1994). Drama for Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  33. Hernández-Hernández, F. (2016). Teaching the Unknown to Facilitate the Emergence of a Pedagogical Event. Visual Inquiry, 5(1), 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jensen, J. B. (2017). Sensing the Problem Instead of Just Talking About It: Arts-Based Pedagogies and Development of Innovative, Professional Identities in Social Education Studies. In T. Chemi, S. G. Davy, & B. Lund (Eds.), Innovative Pedagogy. A Recognition of Emotions and Creativity in Education (pp. 45–58). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  36. McGregor, L., Tate, M., & Robinson, K. (1977). Learning Through Drama: Report of the Schools Council Drama Teaching Project (10–16), Goldsmiths’ College, University of London, UK.Google Scholar
  37. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an Integrative Science of the Person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.042902.130709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neelands, J. (1992). Learning Through Imagined Experience. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  40. Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Opening Up. The Healing Power of Expressing Emotions. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  42. Skårderud, F. (2016). Personlighetens Psykodynamikk [Personality Psychodynamics]. In H. Høgh-Olesen, T. Dalsgaard, & F. Skårderud (Eds.), Moderne personlighetspsykologi [Modern Personality Psychology] (pp. 187–226). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
  43. Springborg, C., & Ladkin, D. (2017). Realising the Potential of Art-Based Interventions in Managerial Learning: Embodied Cognition as an Explanatory Theory. Journal of Business Research.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spurkeland, J. (2014). Relasjonsledelse [Relational Leadership]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  45. Sunde, H. (2012). Forsvarssjefens grunnsyn på ledelse i Forsvaret [Chief-of-Defence’s Fundamental View on Leadership in the Armed Forces]. Oslo: Forsvaret.Google Scholar
  46. Tzu, S. (2003). The Art of War. New York: Barnes & Nobles Classics.Google Scholar
  47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Educational Psychology. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar
  48. Warden, J. A. (1989). The Air Campaign. Planning for Combat. Washington: Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defence Publisher Inc.Google Scholar
  49. Way, B. (1998). Development Through Drama. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  50. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the Mind. A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristian Firing
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kåre Inge Skarsvåg
    • 1
  • Tatiana Chemi
    • 2
  1. 1.The Royal Norwegian Air Force AcademyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations