Advertisement

Conclusion—Arts-Based Methods for Sensuous Learning: Questions and Quality

  • Steven S. Taylor
  • Elena P. AntonacopoulouEmail author
Chapter
  • 214 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities book series (PSBAH)

Abstract

This Volume has explored the idea of using Sensuous Learning to foster better practical judgement in professional practice. More specifically, it has offered examples of how arts-based methods have been used in advancing new modes of learning.

Keywords

Sensuous Scholarship Arts-based Methods Improve Leadership Practices Parush Shape Research Practices 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2014). The Experience of Learning in Space and Time. Prometheus, 32(1), 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2018a). Sensuous Learning: What Is It and Why It Matters in Addressing the Ineptitude in Professional Practice. In E. P. Antonacopoulou & S. S. Taylor (Eds.), Sensuous Learning for Practical Judgment in Professional Practice: Volume 1: Arts-Based Methods (Chapter 2). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2018b). Sensuous Learning for Individuals, Communities and Organisations. In E. P. Antonacopoulou & S. S. Taylor (Eds.), Sensuous Learning for Practical Judgment in Professional Practice: Volume 2: Arts-Based Interventions (Chapter 2). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Bruch, H., & ad Ghoshal, S. (2003). Unleashing Organizational Energy. Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 45–51.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, M., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2012). Energy at Work: A Measurement Validation and Linkage to Unit Effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cross, R., Baker, W., & Parker, A. (2003). What Creates Energy in Organisations? Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 51–56.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, B. (1979). The New Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain: A Course in Enhancing Creativity and Artistic Confidence. New York: Tarcher.Google Scholar
  8. Essén, A., & Värlander, S. W. (2012). The Mutual Constitution of Sensuous and Discursive Understanding in Scientific Practice: An Autoethnographic Lens on Academic Writing. Management Learning, 44(4), 395–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ladkin, D. (2011). The Art of ‘Perceiving Correctly’: What Artists Can Teach Us About Moral Perception. Tamara Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 9(3–4), 91–101.Google Scholar
  10. Panayiotou, A. (2017). Introduction to the Virtual Special Issue on Sensory Knowledge. Management Learning. http://journals.sagepub.com/page/mlq/collections/virtual-special-issues/sensory_knowledge?pbEditor=true. Accessed March 2018.
  11. Springborg, C. (2010). Leadership as Art: Leaders Coming to Their Senses. Leadership, 6(3), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Taylor, S. S. (2004). Presentational Form in First Person Research: Off-Line Collaborative Reflection Using Art. Action Research, 2(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Taylor, S. S. (2014). Silly Social Science Scales: Embracing the Particular. Organizational Aesthetics, 3(1), 4–6.Google Scholar
  14. Taylor, S. S. (2015). Controls and Constraints. Organizational Aesthetics, 4(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
  15. Taylor, S. S. (2016). Seeing More or Seeing Less. Organizational Aesthetics, 5(2), 1–2.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, S. S. (2017). Seeing Differently: Welcome to My OCD World. Organizational Aesthetics, 6(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
  17. Taylor, S. S., & Statler, M. (2013). Material Matters: Increasing Emotional Engagement in Learning. Journal of Management Education. https://doi.org/1052562913489976.
  18. Tenkasi, R. V., & Hay, G. W. (2004). Actionable Knowledge and Scholar-Practitioners: A Process Model of Theory-Practice Linkages. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17, 177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WPI Foisie School of BusinessWorcesterUSA
  2. 2.University of Liverpool Management School (ULMS)LiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations