Sensuous Learning Through Arts-Based Methods: An Introduction

  • Steven S. TaylorEmail author
  • Elena P. Antonacopoulou
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities book series (PSBAH)


The recent launch of a major report (In Professions We Trust) in the British House of Lords, highlights that the eroding trust in professions and professionals (bankers, doctors, lawyers), is a grand challenge of our times (Blond et al. 2015). This challenge cannot be addressed through more regulation using codes of ethical conduct or indeed calls for moral action to underpin professional practice (Oakley and Cocking 2006).


Sensuous Scholarship Arts-based Methods Professional Practice Antonacopoulou Leadership developmentLeadership Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2004). The Dynamics of Reflexive Practice: The Relationship Between Learning and Changing. In M. Reynolds & R. Vince (Eds.), Organizing Reflection (pp. 47–64). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  2. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2018a). Sensuous Learning: What Is It and Why It Matters in Addressing the Ineptitude in Professional Practice. In E. P. Antonacopoulou and S. S. Taylor (Eds.), Sensuous Learning for Practical Judgment in Professional Practice: Volume 1: Arts-based Methods (Chapter 2). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2018b). Energising Critique in Action and in Learning. The GNOSIS 4R Framework. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 15(2), 102–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning. Wellesley, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in Practice—Increasing Professional Effectiveness (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1996). Organizational Learning II—Theory, Method, and Practice. New York, NY and Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  8. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. (1985). Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Barry, D., & Meisiek, S. (2010). Seeing More and Seeing Differently: Sensemaking, Mindfulness, and the Workarts. Organization Studies, 31(11), 1505–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumgarten, A. G. (1750/1936). Aesthetica. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  11. Blond, P., Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Pabst, A. (2015). In Professions We Trust: Fostering Virtuous Practitioners in Teaching, Law and Medicine. ResPublica Report. Available at:
  12. Darso, L. (2004). Artful Creation: Learning-Tales of Arts in Business. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and Education. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
  14. Gabbioneta, C., Prakash, R., & Greenwood, R. (2014). Sustained Corporate Corruption and Processes of Institutional Ascription Within Professional Networks. Journal of Professions and Organization, 1(1), 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hallberg, G. W. (2015). ‘Sensuous Learning’ TEDx Talk. Available at:
  16. Oakley, J., & Cocking, D. (2006). Virtue Ethics and Professional Roles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practicioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Senge, P. M., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (2005). Presence: An Exploration of Profound Change in People, Organizations and Society. New York: Crown Business Press.Google Scholar
  20. Springborg, C. (2018). Sensory Templates and Manager Cognition: Art, Cognitive Science and Spiritual Practice in Management Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Springborg, C., & Ladkin, D. (2018). Realising the Potential of Art-Based Interventions in Managerial Learning: Embodied Cognition as an Explanatory Theory. Journal of Business Research, 85, 532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strati, A. (1992). Aesthetic Understanding of Organizational Life. Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 568–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Strati, A. (1999). Organization and Aesthetics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, S. S., & Hansen, H. (2005). Finding Form: Looking at the Field of Organizational Aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1211–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor, S. S., & Ladkin, D. (2009). Understanding Arts-based Methods in Managerial Development. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vico, G. (1744/1948). The New Science of Giambattista Vico (T. G. Bergin & M. H. Fisch, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Zull, J. E. (2006). Key Aspects of How the Brain Learns. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (110), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WPI Foisie School of BusinessWorcesterUSA
  2. 2.University of Liverpool Management School (ULMS)LiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations