Assessment of Sensory Taste Perception in Children

Part of the Springer Series on Epidemiology and Public Health book series (SSEH)


In health research, sensory taste perception and preference have rarely been examined. Especially in children, it is challenging to conduct sensory taste perception and preference tests due to their still-developing cognitive and physiological abilities. In the IDEFICS and I.Family studies, four different instruments were developed to assess sensory taste perception and preference in children, adolescents and their parents across Europe. A taste threshold test and a taste preference test were adapted to be used in children from the age of 6 years onwards in the IDEFICS study. A food and beverage preference questionnaire and a taste intensity test were adapted to be used in I.Family. The taste preference test and the taste intensity test were conducted with standardised real foods to obtain results that are relevant for real-life conditions. The taste threshold test was conducted with standardised solutions. All test procedures were standardised across the participating countries, and all materials were supplied centrally and tested for suitability. Experiences in the surveys showed that these four instruments were suitable to be used in children and adolescents. The game-like character of the sensory test module enhanced the acceptance of this survey module and made it quite popular among the participating children. Furthermore, the sensory tests were reported to be the participants’ favourite procedure during the surveys. In conclusion, these tests were feasible to be conducted in large-scale studies across Europe.


Perceived Taste Sensation Taste Preference Test IDEFICS Study Taste Threshold Game-like Quality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The development of instruments, the baseline data collection and the first follow-up work as part of the IDEFICS study ( were financially supported by the European Commission within the Sixth RTD Framework Programme Contract No. 016181 (FOOD). The most recent follow-up including the development of new instruments and the adaptation of previously used instruments was conducted in the framework of the I.Family study ( which was funded by the European Commission within the Seventh RTD Framework Programme Contract No. 266044 (KBBE 2010–14).

We thank all families for participating in the extensive examinations of the IDEFICS and I.Family studies. We are also grateful for the support from school boards, headmasters and communities.


  1. Ahrens W, IDEFICS consortium. Sensory taste preferences and taste sensitivity and the association of unhealthy food patterns with overweight and obesity in primary school children in Europe—a synthesis of data from the IDEFICS study. Flavour. 2015;4:8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahrens W, Bammann K, Siani A, Buchecker K, De Henauw S, Iacoviello L, et al. IDEFICS consortium. The IDEFICS cohort: design, characteristics and participation in the baseline survey. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35(Suppl 1):S3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahrens W, Siani A, Adan R, De Henauw S, Eiben G, Gwozdz W, I.Family consortium, et al. Cohort profile: the transition from childhood to adolescence in European children – how I.Family extends the IDEFICS cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(5):1394–5j.Google Scholar
  4. Anliker JA, Bartoshuk L, Ferris AM, Hooks LD. Children’s food preferences and genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54(2):316–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM. Standard guide for sensory evaluation of products by children and minors. Designation: E2299 − 13. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 2013.Google Scholar
  6. Azadbakht L, Esmaillzadeh A. Fast foods and risk of chronic diseases. JRMS. 2008;13(1):1–2.Google Scholar
  7. Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Green BG, Hoffman HJ, Ko CW, Lucchina LA, et al. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching. Physiol Behav. 2004;82(1):109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellisle F. Glutamate and the UMAMI taste: sensory, metabolic, nutritional and behavioural considerations. A review of the literature published in the last 10 years. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999;23(3):423–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deglaire A, Méjean C, Castetbon K, Kesse-Guyot E, Urbano C, Hercberg S, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assay recalled liking for salt, sweet and fat. Food Qual Prefer. 2012;23(2):110–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doty RL, Shah M. Taste and smell. In: Marshall MH, Janette BB, editors. Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development. San Diego: Academic Press; 2008. p. 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Sullivan BS, Faghri P. Surveying food and beverage liking: a tool for epidemiological studies to connect chemosensation with health outcomes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1170:558–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glanville EV, Kaplan AR, Fischer R. Age, sex, and taste sensitivity. J Gerontol. 1964;19(4):474–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green BG, Dalton P, Cowart B, Shaffer G, Rankin K, Higgins J. Evaluating the ‘Labeled Magnitude Scale’ for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem Senses. 1996;21(3):323–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guinard JX. Sensory and consumer testing with children. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2001;11:273–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He K, Zhao LC, Daviglus ML, Dyer AR, Van Horn L, Garside D, et al. Association of monosodium glutamate intake with overweight in Chinese adults: the INTERMAP study. Obesity. 2008;16(8):1875–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. James CE, Laing DG, Oram N. A comparison of the ability of 8-9-year-old children and adults to detect taste stimuli. Physiol Behav. 1997;62(1):193–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jilani HS, Intemann T, Bogl LH, Eiben G, Molnar D, Moreno LA, I.Family consortium, et al. Familial aggregation and socio-demographic correlates of taste preferences in European children. BMC Nutrition. 2017;3:87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimmel S, Sigman-Grant MJ, Guinard JX. Sensory testing with young children. Food Technol. 1994;48:92–9.Google Scholar
  19. Knof K, Lanfer A, Bildstein MO, Buchecker K, Hilz H, IDEFICS consortium. Development of a method to measure sensory perception in children at the European level. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35(Suppl 1):S131–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kroll BJ. Evaluating rating scales for sensory testing with children. Food Technol. 1990;44:78–86.Google Scholar
  21. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorial data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanfer A, Knof K, Barba G, Veidebaum T, Papoutsou S, De Henauw S, IDEFICS consortium, et al. Taste preferences in association with dietary habits and weight status in European children: results from the IDEFICS study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(1):27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lanfer A, Bammann K, Knof K, Buchecker K, Russo P, Veidebaum T, et al. Predictors and correlates of taste preferences in European children: the IDEFICS study. Food Qual Prefer. 2013;27(2):128–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Léon F, Couronne T, Marcuz MC, Köster EP. Measuring food liking in children: a comparison of non verbal methods. Food Qual Prefer. 1999;10(2):93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liem DG, Mars M, de Graaf C. Consistency of sensory testing with 4- and 5-year-old children. Food Qual Prefer. 2004;15(6):541–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Linschoten MR, Harvey LO, Eller PM, Jafek BW. Fast and accurate measurement of taste and smell thresholds using a maximum-likelihood adaptive staircase procedure. Percept Psychophys. 2001;63(8):1330–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lissner L, Lanfer A, Gwozdz W, Olafsdottir S, Eiben G, Moreno LA, et al. Television habits in relation to overweight, diet and taste preferences in European children: the IDEFICS study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(9):705–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mennella JA, Finkbeiner S, Reed DR. The proof is in the pudding: children prefer lower fat but higher sugar than do mothers. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(10):1285–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Popper R, Kroll JJ. Conducting sensory research with children. J Sens Stud. 2005;20(1):75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Plattig KH. The sense of taste. In: Piggot JR, editor. Sensory analysis of foods. New York: Elsevier; 1984. p. 1–22.Google Scholar
  31. Pfaffmann C, Bartoshuk LM, McBurney DH. Taste psychophysics. In: Beidler LM, editor. Handbook of sensory physiology. New York: Springer; 1971. p. 75–101.Google Scholar
  32. Rogers PJ, Blundell JE. Umami and appetite: effects of monosodium glutamate on hunger and food intake in human subjects. Physiol Behav. 1990;48(6):801–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Snyder DJ, Bartoshuk LM. Epidemiological studies of taste function: discussion and perspectives. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1170:574–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sorensen LB, Moller P, Flint A, Martens M, Raben A. Effect of sensory perception of foods on appetite and food intake: a review of studies on humans. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(10):1152–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Suling M, Hebestreit A, Peplies J, Bammann K, Nappo A, Eiben G, IDEFICS consortium, et al. Design and results of the pretest of the IDEFICS study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35(Suppl 1):S30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vereecken C, Covents M, Parmentier J, Maes L. Test-retest reliability and agreement between children’s and parents’ reports of a computerized food preferences tool. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(1):8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zandstra EH, de Graaf C. Sensory perception and pleasantness of orange beverages from childhood to old age. Food Qual Prefer. 1998;9(1–2):5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology—BIPSBremenGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research (IPP), Working Group Epidemiology of Demographic ChangeUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
  3. 3.Department of Food ScienceTechnologie-Transfer-Zentrum (TTZ Bremerhaven)BremerhavenGermany
  4. 4.University of Applied Sciences BremerhavenBremerhavenGermany

Personalised recommendations