Skip to main content

Assessment of Sensory Taste Perception in Children

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Instruments for Health Surveys in Children and Adolescents

Abstract

In health research, sensory taste perception and preference have rarely been examined. Especially in children, it is challenging to conduct sensory taste perception and preference tests due to their still-developing cognitive and physiological abilities. In the IDEFICS and I.Family studies, four different instruments were developed to assess sensory taste perception and preference in children, adolescents and their parents across Europe. A taste threshold test and a taste preference test were adapted to be used in children from the age of 6 years onwards in the IDEFICS study. A food and beverage preference questionnaire and a taste intensity test were adapted to be used in I.Family. The taste preference test and the taste intensity test were conducted with standardised real foods to obtain results that are relevant for real-life conditions. The taste threshold test was conducted with standardised solutions. All test procedures were standardised across the participating countries, and all materials were supplied centrally and tested for suitability. Experiences in the surveys showed that these four instruments were suitable to be used in children and adolescents. The game-like character of the sensory test module enhanced the acceptance of this survey module and made it quite popular among the participating children. Furthermore, the sensory tests were reported to be the participants’ favourite procedure during the surveys. In conclusion, these tests were feasible to be conducted in large-scale studies across Europe.

On behalf of the IDEFICS and I.Family consortia

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahrens W, IDEFICS consortium. Sensory taste preferences and taste sensitivity and the association of unhealthy food patterns with overweight and obesity in primary school children in Europe—a synthesis of data from the IDEFICS study. Flavour. 2015;4:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens W, Bammann K, Siani A, Buchecker K, De Henauw S, Iacoviello L, et al. IDEFICS consortium. The IDEFICS cohort: design, characteristics and participation in the baseline survey. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35(Suppl 1):S3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens W, Siani A, Adan R, De Henauw S, Eiben G, Gwozdz W, I.Family consortium, et al. Cohort profile: the transition from childhood to adolescence in European children – how I.Family extends the IDEFICS cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(5):1394–5j.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anliker JA, Bartoshuk L, Ferris AM, Hooks LD. Children’s food preferences and genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54(2):316–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM. Standard guide for sensory evaluation of products by children and minors. Designation: E2299 − 13. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadbakht L, Esmaillzadeh A. Fast foods and risk of chronic diseases. JRMS. 2008;13(1):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Green BG, Hoffman HJ, Ko CW, Lucchina LA, et al. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching. Physiol Behav. 2004;82(1):109–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellisle F. Glutamate and the UMAMI taste: sensory, metabolic, nutritional and behavioural considerations. A review of the literature published in the last 10 years. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999;23(3):423–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deglaire A, Méjean C, Castetbon K, Kesse-Guyot E, Urbano C, Hercberg S, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assay recalled liking for salt, sweet and fat. Food Qual Prefer. 2012;23(2):110–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Shah M. Taste and smell. In: Marshall MH, Janette BB, editors. Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development. San Diego: Academic Press; 2008. p. 299–308.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Sullivan BS, Faghri P. Surveying food and beverage liking: a tool for epidemiological studies to connect chemosensation with health outcomes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1170:558–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanville EV, Kaplan AR, Fischer R. Age, sex, and taste sensitivity. J Gerontol. 1964;19(4):474–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green BG, Dalton P, Cowart B, Shaffer G, Rankin K, Higgins J. Evaluating the ‘Labeled Magnitude Scale’ for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem Senses. 1996;21(3):323–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinard JX. Sensory and consumer testing with children. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2001;11:273–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He K, Zhao LC, Daviglus ML, Dyer AR, Van Horn L, Garside D, et al. Association of monosodium glutamate intake with overweight in Chinese adults: the INTERMAP study. Obesity. 2008;16(8):1875–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James CE, Laing DG, Oram N. A comparison of the ability of 8-9-year-old children and adults to detect taste stimuli. Physiol Behav. 1997;62(1):193–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jilani HS, Intemann T, Bogl LH, Eiben G, Molnar D, Moreno LA, I.Family consortium, et al. Familial aggregation and socio-demographic correlates of taste preferences in European children. BMC Nutrition. 2017;3:87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel S, Sigman-Grant MJ, Guinard JX. Sensory testing with young children. Food Technol. 1994;48:92–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knof K, Lanfer A, Bildstein MO, Buchecker K, Hilz H, IDEFICS consortium. Development of a method to measure sensory perception in children at the European level. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35(Suppl 1):S131–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll BJ. Evaluating rating scales for sensory testing with children. Food Technol. 1990;44:78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorial data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanfer A, Knof K, Barba G, Veidebaum T, Papoutsou S, De Henauw S, IDEFICS consortium, et al. Taste preferences in association with dietary habits and weight status in European children: results from the IDEFICS study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(1):27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanfer A, Bammann K, Knof K, Buchecker K, Russo P, Veidebaum T, et al. Predictors and correlates of taste preferences in European children: the IDEFICS study. Food Qual Prefer. 2013;27(2):128–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Léon F, Couronne T, Marcuz MC, Köster EP. Measuring food liking in children: a comparison of non verbal methods. Food Qual Prefer. 1999;10(2):93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liem DG, Mars M, de Graaf C. Consistency of sensory testing with 4- and 5-year-old children. Food Qual Prefer. 2004;15(6):541–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linschoten MR, Harvey LO, Eller PM, Jafek BW. Fast and accurate measurement of taste and smell thresholds using a maximum-likelihood adaptive staircase procedure. Percept Psychophys. 2001;63(8):1330–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lissner L, Lanfer A, Gwozdz W, Olafsdottir S, Eiben G, Moreno LA, et al. Television habits in relation to overweight, diet and taste preferences in European children: the IDEFICS study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(9):705–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennella JA, Finkbeiner S, Reed DR. The proof is in the pudding: children prefer lower fat but higher sugar than do mothers. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(10):1285–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper R, Kroll JJ. Conducting sensory research with children. J Sens Stud. 2005;20(1):75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plattig KH. The sense of taste. In: Piggot JR, editor. Sensory analysis of foods. New York: Elsevier; 1984. p. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffmann C, Bartoshuk LM, McBurney DH. Taste psychophysics. In: Beidler LM, editor. Handbook of sensory physiology. New York: Springer; 1971. p. 75–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers PJ, Blundell JE. Umami and appetite: effects of monosodium glutamate on hunger and food intake in human subjects. Physiol Behav. 1990;48(6):801–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder DJ, Bartoshuk LM. Epidemiological studies of taste function: discussion and perspectives. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1170:574–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen LB, Moller P, Flint A, Martens M, Raben A. Effect of sensory perception of foods on appetite and food intake: a review of studies on humans. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(10):1152–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suling M, Hebestreit A, Peplies J, Bammann K, Nappo A, Eiben G, IDEFICS consortium, et al. Design and results of the pretest of the IDEFICS study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35(Suppl 1):S30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vereecken C, Covents M, Parmentier J, Maes L. Test-retest reliability and agreement between children’s and parents’ reports of a computerized food preferences tool. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(1):8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zandstra EH, de Graaf C. Sensory perception and pleasantness of orange beverages from childhood to old age. Food Qual Prefer. 1998;9(1–2):5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The development of instruments, the baseline data collection and the first follow-up work as part of the IDEFICS study (www.idefics.eu) were financially supported by the European Commission within the Sixth RTD Framework Programme Contract No. 016181 (FOOD). The most recent follow-up including the development of new instruments and the adaptation of previously used instruments was conducted in the framework of the I.Family study (www.ifamilystudy.eu) which was funded by the European Commission within the Seventh RTD Framework Programme Contract No. 266044 (KBBE 2010–14).

We thank all families for participating in the extensive examinations of the IDEFICS and I.Family studies. We are also grateful for the support from school boards, headmasters and communities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah Jilani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jilani, H., Peplies, J., Buchecker, K. (2019). Assessment of Sensory Taste Perception in Children. In: Bammann, K., Lissner, L., Pigeot, I., Ahrens, W. (eds) Instruments for Health Surveys in Children and Adolescents. Springer Series on Epidemiology and Public Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98857-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98857-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98856-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98857-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics