Abstract
Despite subterranean communities being relatively simple, their precise characterization still represents an interesting ecological challenge. This is mostly because, due to the inaccessibility of most subterranean habitats, the spatial boundaries and the species composition of the communities are difficult to define. In this chapter, we describe the general structure and composition of a cave community, keeping in mind different theoretical approaches. We discuss how spatial and temporal turnover occur within most cave biocoenosis, leading to complex species interactions among the resident species. Particular attention is paid to characterizing the ecological niche and the interspecific competition dynamics in cave ecosystems, showing how competition often arises from niche overlaps in species exploiting similar resources and microhabitats. The use of caves as model systems to study basic ecological concepts such as communities, niche, and species interactions has great potential for advancing ecological knowledge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albertano P (2012) Cyanobacterial biofilms in monuments and caves. In: Whitton BA (ed) Ecology of cyanobacteria II: their diversity in space and time. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 317–343
Bento DDM, Ferreira RL, Prous X et al (2016) Seasonal variations in cave invertebrate communities in the semi-arid Caatinga, Brazil. J Cave Karst Stud 78:61–71
Blonder B, Lamanna C, Violle C et al (2014) The n-dimensional hyper-volume. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:595–609
Bloom T, Binford GA, Esposito L et al (2014) Discovery of two new species of eyeless spiders within a single Hispaniola cave. J Arachnol 42:148–154
Bourne JD (1976) Notes préliminaires sur la distribution spatiale du Meta menardi, Triphosa dubitata, Triphosa sabaudiata, Nelima aurantiaca et Culex pipiens au sain d’un écosystéme cavernicole (Grotte de Scierce: Mte. Savoie). Int J Speleol 8:253–267
Cardoso P (2012) Diversity and community assembly patterns of epigean vs. troglobiont spiders in the Iberian Peninsula. Int J Speleol 41:83–94
Chapman PRJ (1985) Are the cavernicoles found in Hawaiian lava tubes just visiting? Proc Univ Bristol Spel Soc 17:175–182
Chelini MC, Willemart RH, Gnaspini P (2011) Caves as a winter refuge by a Neotropical harvestman (Arachnida, Opiliones). J Insect Behav 24:393–398
Christman MC, Culver DC, Madden MK et al (2005) Patterns of endemism of the eastern North American cave fauna. J Biogeogr 32:1441–1452
Clements FE (1916) Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication, Washington, DC
Crouau-Roy B, Crouau Y, Source CF (1992) Dynamic and temporal structure of the troglobitic beetle Speonomus hydrophilus (Coleoptera: Bathysciinae). Ecography 15:12–18
Culver DC (1973) Competition in spatially heterogeneous systems: an analysis of simple cave communities. Ecology 54:102–110
Culver DC (1975) Interaction between competition and predation in cave stream communities. Int J Speleol 7:229–245
Culver DC, Pipan T (2009) The biology of caves and other subterranean habitats. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Culver DC, Pipan T (2014) Shallow subterranean habitats: ecology, evolution, and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Culver DC, Pipan T (2015) Shifting paradigms of the evolution of cave life. Acta Carsol 44:415–425
Culver DC, Sket B (2000) Hotspots of subterranean biodiversity in caves and wells. J Cave Karst Stud 62:11–17
Delay B (1969) Recherches sur le peuplement de la zone de percolation temporaire des massifs karstiques. These Doc., 3éme Cycle, Fac. Sciences, Toulouse
Fišer C, Blejec A, Trontelj P (2012) Niche-based mechanisms operating within extreme habitats: a case study of subterranean amphipod communities. Biol Lett 8:578–581
Fišer C, Luštrik R, Sarbu S et al (2015) Morphological evolution of coexisting amphipod species pairs from sulfidic caves suggests competitive interactions and character displacement, but no environmental filtering and convergence. PLoS One 10:e0123535
Gers C (1995) Stratégies alimentaires de coléoptères troglobies du genre Aphaenops (Coleoptera, Trechinae). Mem Biospeol 22:35–45
Gibert J, Deharveng L (2002) Subterranean ecosystems: a truncated functional biodiversity. Bioscience 52:473–481
Gleason HA (1926) The structure and development of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 43:463–481
Howarth FG (1983) Ecology of cave arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 28:365–389
Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hutchinson G (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 22:415–427
Jeannel R (1926) Faune cavernicole de la France, avec une etude des conditions d’existence dans le domaine souterraine. Le Chevalier, Paris
Kozel P, Novak T, Klokočovnik V et al (2015) Comparison of overwinterings in two harvestman species (Arachnida: Opiliones) in subterranean habitats. In: Abstracts of the 29th European congress of arachnology, Brno (CZ), 24–28 August 2015
Lipovšek S, Novak T, Janžekovič F et al (2016) Malpighian tubule cells in overwintering cave crickets Troglophilus cavicola (Kollar, 1833) and T. neglectus Krauss, 1879 (Rhaphidophoridae, Ensifera). PLoS One 11:e0158598
Malard F, Boutin C, Camacho AI et al (2009) Diversity patterns of stygobiotic crustaceans across multiple spatial scales in Europe. Freshw Biol 54:756–776
Mammola S, Isaia M (2016) The ecological niche of a specialized subterranean spider. Invertebr Biol 135:20–30
Mammola S, Isaia M (2017) Spiders in caves. Proc R Soc Biol B 284:20170193
Mammola S, Piano E, Giachino PM et al (2015) Seasonal dynamics and micro-climatic preference of two Alpine endemic hypogean beetles. Int J Speleol 44:239–249
Mammola S, Giachino PM, Piano E et al (2016a) Ecology and sampling techniques of an understudied subterranean habitat: the Milieu Souterrain Superficiel (MSS). Sci Nat 103:88
Mammola S, Piano E, Isaia M (2016b) Step back! Niche dynamics in cave-dwelling predators. Acta Oecol 75:35–42
Moseley M (2009) Size matters: scalar phenomena and a proposal for an ecological definition of ‘cave. J Cave Karst Stud 35:89–94
Northup DE, Lavoie KH (2001) Geomicrobiology of caves: a review. Geomicrobiol J 18:199–222
Novak T, Perc M, Lipovšek S et al (2012) Duality of terrestrial subterranean fauna. Int J Speleol 41:181–188
Poulson TL (1977) A tale of two spiders. Cave Research Foundation Annual Report, pp 245–248
Poulson TL, White WB (1969) The cave environment. Science 165:971–981
Prous X, Ferreira RS, Martins RP (2004) Ecotone delimitation: Epigean-hypogean transition in cave ecosystems. Aust Ecol 29:374–382
Prous X, Lopes Ferreira R, Jacobi CM (2015) The entrance as a complex ecotone in a Neotropical cave. Int J Speleol 44:177–189
Resende LPA, Bichuette ME (2016) Sharing the space: coexistence among terrestrial predators in Neotropical caves. J Nat Hist 50:2107–2128
Ricklefs RE (2006) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up? Ecology 87:1424–1423
Sendra A, Reboleira ASPS (2012) The world deepest subterranean community – Krubera-Voronja Cave (Western Caucasus). Int J Speleol 41:221–230
Sharratt NJ, Picker MD, Samways MJ (2000) The invertebrate fauna of the sandstone caves of the Cape Peninsula (South Africa): patterns of endemism and conservation priorities. Biodivers Conserv 9:107–143
Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2016) The first two hotspots of subterranean biodiversity in South America. Subterr Biol 19:1–21
Stoch F, Galassi DM (2010) Stygobiotic crustacean species richness: a question of numbers, a matter of scale. Hydrobiologia 653:217–234
Tobin BW, Hutchins BT, Schwartz BF (2013) Spatial and temporal changes in invertebrate assemblage structure from the entrance to deep-cave zone of a temperate marble cave. Int J Speleol 42:203–214
Trajano E, Gallão JE, Bichuette ME (2016) Spots of high diversity of troglobites in Brazil: the challenge of measuring subterranean diversity. Biodivers Conserv 25:1805–1828
Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338
Zagmajster M, Eme D, Fišer C et al (2014) Geographic variation in range size and beta diversity of groundwater crustaceans: insights from habitats with low thermal seasonality. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1135–1145
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Wolfgang Nentwig for providing insightful comments on an early version of the chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mammola, S., Isaia, M. (2018). Cave Communities and Species Interactions. In: Moldovan, O., Kováč, Ľ., Halse, S. (eds) Cave Ecology. Ecological Studies, vol 235. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98852-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98852-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98850-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98852-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)