European Regions and Their Interests

  • Riccardo TrobbianiEmail author


Trobbiani provides a concise overview of regional lobbying vis-à-vis EU institutions, analysing the nature of regional interest in Brussels, its organizational modes and channels of expression. Based on a brief assessment of the rationale and evolution of the phenomenon, the author focuses on recent developments, underlining two interrelated aspects: first, the double, complementary, nature of regions as public authorities as well as intermediaries and coordinators for economic, social and cultural actors based in their territory and second, the fundamentally cooperative nature of regional lobbying which, through an increasing use of thematic and policy-oriented networks, creates inclusive alliances and progressively learns to play by the same rules of broad civil society actors—providing specialized knowledge in exchange for inclusion in the policy-making process.


  1. AER. (2014). AER political priorities 2014. Adopted by the Executive Board on 30 January 2014 in Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  2. AER. (2016). Statute of the Assembly of European Regions. Adopted by the AER General Assembly on 23 June 2016 in Nordland.Google Scholar
  3. AER. (2016a). AER Action plan 2016–2017. Adopted by the AER General Assembly in June 2016. Accessed November 30, 2016, from
  4. Ammassari, G. P. (2010). The role of local government bodies in European policy making. International Review of Sociology, 20(3), 445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayuso, L. E. (2009). Las comunidades autónomas en el Consejo de la Unión Europea: la representación de Cataluña. Revista d’estudis autonòmics i federals, 8, 85–118.Google Scholar
  6. Borońska-Hryniewiecka, K. (2013). Regions and subsidiarity after Lisbon: overcoming the “regional blindness”? Luiss School of Government Working Paper 3/2013, LUISS, Rome.Google Scholar
  7. Bourne, A. K. (Ed.) (2004). The domestic politics of regionalism and European integration. In The EU and territorial politics within member states: conflict or co-operation? (pp. 347–362). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  8. Bouza García, L. (2011). La participación autonómica y local en redes de cooperación europea. Reala, January–August, 315–316.Google Scholar
  9. Brunazzo, M. (2004). Le Regioni italiane nella “multi-level governance”: I canali di accesso alla UE. Istituzioni del federalismo: rivista di studi giuridici e politici, 4, 623–645.Google Scholar
  10. CEMR. (2008). CEMR and the European Parliament resolution on the activities of lobbyists in the European institutions. Accessed December 2, 2016, from
  11. CEMR. (2012). CEMR: A Europe with a local and regional dimension. Accessed August 7, 2017, from
  12. CEMR. (2014). Introducing CEMR. Accessed December 6, 2017, from
  13. Conzelmann, T. (2008). Towards a new concept of multi-level governance. Speech given at MLG Atelier, 10 September 2008, Committee of the Regions, Brussels. Accessed December 6, 2017, from
  14. CoR. (2008). Common Action Plan 2008/2009 of the Committee of the Regions and REGLEG. Brussels. Accessed August 15, 2017, from
  15. CoR. (2013). Report on the subsidiarity early warning system of the Lisbon treaty – The Role of Regional Parliaments with legislative powers and other subnational authorities. Prepared by the Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, Leuven.Google Scholar
  16. CoR. (2016). List of the regional offices in Brussels. Accessed October 27, 2017, from
  17. CoR. (n.d.). A new treaty: A new role for regions and local authorities. Accessed November 30, 2017, from
  18. Del Vecchio, G. (2012). Vivere l’Europa: il sistema di rappresentanza degli enti locali a Bruxelles. Milan: Egea.Google Scholar
  19. Dialer, D. (2014). The regional policy power of the EU Parliament after the European Elections 2014. In Grabher, G. M., & Mathis-Moser, U. (Eds.), Regionalism(s). A variety of perspectives from Europe and the Americas (pp. 89–106). Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Föderalismus, (119). Wien: New Academic Press (NAP).Google Scholar
  20. Donas, T., & Beyers, J. (2012). How regions assemble in Brussels: The organizational form of territorial representation in the European Union. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 43(4), 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drigani, M. (2013). La legge 24 dicembre 2012, n. 234: analogie e differenze con la legge Buttiglione. Le Regioni, 5–6, 905–946.Google Scholar
  22. ERRIN. (2016). ERRIN Website. Accessed December 6, 2016, from
  23. Greenwood, J. (2011). Interest representation in the European Union (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenwood, J. (2011a). Actors of the common interest? The Brussels offices of the regions. Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Happaerts, S. (2008). Inter-subnational networks for sustainable development state-of-the-art and the experiences of Flanders and Wallonia. Working Paper n°8, November 2008, KU Leuven, Leuven.Google Scholar
  26. Hönnige, C., & Panke, D. (2013). The committee of the regions and the European economic and social committee: How influential are consultative committees in the European Union? Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(3), 452–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hooghe, L. (1995). The European Union and multi-level governance in practice: Patterns of subnational involvement: Expansion, divergence, complexity. Paper presented at the European Union Studies Association Biennial Conference, 11–14 May 1995, Charleston.Google Scholar
  28. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  29. Huysseune, M., & Jans, M. T. (2008). Brussels as the capital of a Europe of the regions. Brussels Studies, 16(25).Google Scholar
  30. Jeffery, C. (2003). Regions and the Future of Europe, EU – Member State – Region: Finding the right architecture. Reform Spotlight Paper 2003/02, Center for Applied Policy Research, University of Munich, Munich.Google Scholar
  31. Keating, M. (2000). Paradiplomacy and regional networking. Lecture given at forum of federations: An International Federalism, October 2000, Hanover.Google Scholar
  32. Knodt, M. (2011). Strategies of territorial and functional interests: Towards a model of European interest intermediation? Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knodt, M., Greenwood, J., & Quittkat, J. (2011). Territorial and functional interest representation in EU governance. Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morass, M. (1997). Austria: The case of a federal newcomer in European Union Politics. In C. Jeffery (Ed.), Regional dimension of the European Union: Towards a third level in Europe? (pp. 76–95). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. NEREUS. (2016). NEREUS website. Accessed December 6, 2017, from
  36. Nouvilas Rodrigo, M. (2012). Las oficinas regionales españolas en Bruselas: ¿la clave para una participación efectiva en la UE? Revista CIDOB d’afers internacionals, 99(1), 113–131.Google Scholar
  37. Olsson, A. (2009). Euroscepticism revisited-regional interest representation in Brussels and the link to Citizen Attitudes towards European integration. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial International Conference of the European Union Studies Association, 23–25 April 2009, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  38. Pasquier, R. (2012). Quand le local rencontre le global: Contours et enjeux de l'action internationale des collectivités territoriales. Revue française d’administration publique, 141, 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Piattoni, S. (2009a). Multilevel governance: A historical and conceptual analysis. European Integration, 31(2), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Piattoni, S. (2009b). Multilevel governance in the EU. Does it work? Paper presented at the conference Globalization and Politics: A Conference in Honor of Suzanne Berger, 8–9 May 2009, MIT, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  41. Piattoni, S. (2011). The problematic coexistence of functional and territorial representation in the EU. Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piattoni, S. (2012). The Committee of the regions and the upgrading of subnational territorial representation. In S. Kröger & D. Friedrich (Eds.), The challenge of democratic representation in the European Union (pp. 59–73). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. REGLEG. (2016). About REGLEG. Accessed October 30, 2017, from
  44. Rowe, C. (2011). Regional representations in the EU: Between diplomacy and interest mediation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tatham, M. (2008). Going solo: Direct regional representation in the European Union. Regional and Federal Studies, 18(5), 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tilindyte, L. (2016). Regional participation in EU decision-making: Role in the legislature and subsidiarity monitoring, in depth-analysis. European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels.Google Scholar
  47. Trobbiani, R. (2016). European regions in Brussels: Towards functional interest representation? Bruges Political Research Papers 53/2016, College of Europe, Bruges.Google Scholar
  48. Weatherill, S., & Bernitz, U. (2005). The role of regions and sub-national actors in Europe. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar


  1. Treaty on European Union (TEU), Consolidated version, Treaty of Lisbon, 13 December 2007.Google Scholar
  2. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Consolidated version, Treaty of Lisbon, 13 December 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNU-CRISBrugesBelgium
  2. 2.College of EuropeBrugesBelgium

Personalised recommendations