Skip to main content

Plug and Play Negations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contradictions, from Consistency to Inconsistency

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 47))

Abstract

We study an array of logics defined on a small set of connectives (including an implication \(\rightarrow \) and a bottom particle \(\bot \)) by modularly considering subsets of a set of inference rules that we fix at the start of the game. We provide complete semantics based on possibly non-deterministic logical matrices and complexity upper bounds for the considered logics. As a consequence of the techniques applied, we also obtain completeness results for the negation-only fragments (obtained by defining the negation connective as \(\lnot p:=p\rightarrow \bot \), as usual) of all the above-mentioned logics, and analyze their possible paraconsistent character.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that in \(\textsf {CL}\) this is quite natural as all the other classical connectives are definable from \(\rightarrow \) and \(\bot \). In \(\textsf {IL}\) this is not the case, as for example neither conjunction nor disjunction can be defined from \(\rightarrow \) and \(\bot \). Still, for neatness of presentation, we commit this abuse of notation also here.

  2. 2.

    The class of Hilbert algebras [11] is the algebraic semantics of the \(\{\rightarrow \}\)-fragment of intuitionistic logic. Hilbert algebras, also called (positive) implication(al) algebras [1, 15], correspond to \(\{\rightarrow \}\)-subreducts of Heyting algebras and thus have a definable natural order which has 1 as maximum element but need not have a minimum.

  3. 3.

    Which is the \(\{\lnot \}\)-reduct of \(\mathbb {G}_{3}\), corresponding to three-valued Gödel logic, see [9].

  4. 4.

    This easily follows from [5] and the fact that \(\textsf {MP}\) is weaker than \(\textsf {IL}\).

References

  1. Abbott, J.C. 1967. Implicational algebras. Bulletin Math\(\acute{e}\)matique de la Soci\(\acute{e}\)t\(\acute{e}\)des Sciences Math\(\acute{e}\)matiques de la R\(\acute{e}\)publique Socialiste de Roumanie 11: 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avron, A., and I. Lev. 2005. Non-deterministic multiple-valued structures. Journal of Logic and Computation 15: 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avron, A., and A. Zamansky. 2011. Non-deterministic semantics for logical systems. In Handbook of philosophical logic, vol. 16, 2nd ed, ed. D.M. Gabbay, and F. Guenthner, 227–304. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caleiro, C., and S. Marcelino. 2016. Decidability and complexity of fibred logics without shared connectives. Logic Journal of IGPL 24: 673–707.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caleiro, C., S. Marcelino, and U. Rivieccio. 2018. Characterizing finite-valuedness. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 345: 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carnielli, W., and J. Marcos. 2002. A taxonomy of c-systems. In The logical way to the inconsistent, ed. M. Coniglio, W. Carnielli, and I.M. D’Ottaviano, 1–94. Baco Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dodó, A., and J. Marcos. 2014. Negative modalities, consistency and determinedness. ENTCS 300: 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Galatos, N., P. Jipsen, T. Kowalski, and H. Ono. 2007. Residuated lattices: an algebraic glimpse at substructural logics, vol. 151., Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gottwald, S. 2001. A treatise on many-valued logics, vol. 9., Studies in logic and computation Baldock: Research Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hájek, P. 1998. Metamathematics of fuzzy logic, vol. 4., Trends in logic-studia logica library Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  11. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences2002. A Note on Homomorphisms of Hilbert Algebras. 29: 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1155/S0161171202011134.

  12. Marcelino, S., and C. Caleiro. 2016. On the characterization of fibred logics, with applications to conservativity and finite-valuedness. Journal of Logic and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exw023.

  13. Marcelino, S., and C. Caleiro. 2017. Disjoint fibring of non-deterministic matrices. In Logic, language, information, and computation, ed. J. Kennedy, and R. de Queiroz, 242–255. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marcos, J. 2009. What is a non-truth-functional logic? Studia Logica 92: 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rasiowa, H. 1974. An algebraic approach to non-classical logics., Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Statman, R. 1979. Intuitionistic propositional logic is polynomial-space complete. Theoretical Computer Science 9: 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(79)90006-9.

  17. Wójcicki, R. 1988. Theory of logical calculi. basic theory of consequence operations, vol. 199., Synthese library Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first two authors thank the support of the FEDER/FCT project PEst-OE/EEI/LA0008/2013 of Instituto de Telecomunicações. The first author also acknowledges the FCT postdoctoral grant SFRH/BPD/76513/2011. Finally, we would like to thank Fey Liang for pointing out a deadly mistake in an earlier version of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sérgio Marcelino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marcelino, S., Caleiro, C., Rivieccio, U. (2018). Plug and Play Negations. In: Carnielli, W., Malinowski, J. (eds) Contradictions, from Consistency to Inconsistency. Trends in Logic, vol 47. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98797-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics