Skip to main content

Introducing Spatio-Temporal Conservation Units: Models for Flexible Optimization of Species Persistence Under Climate Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Climate Change and Biodiversity

Part of the book series: Climate Change Management ((CCM))

Abstract

Anticipating the effects of climate change on biodiversity and integrating them in planning protocols for the future are fundamental strategies to increase the effectiveness of conservation efforts. With climate change, species require dispersal skills to follow displacements of their suitable climates and therefore, spatial conservation interventions need to consider such dynamics. In general, common planning frameworks identify networks of conservation areas seemed important for species range shifts. However, it is highly unlikely that all the areas in a network present synchronous conservation value. Furthermore, given the continuous (spatial and temporal autocorrelated) nature of threats and ecological processes, the value of each area is largely dependent on the state of the neighboring areas in the recent past. In this study, a family of three models centered on the prioritization (not of single areas but) of temporal chains of areas as conservation units is presented. These models drive the use of financial investments through time in order to maximize the persistence of biodiversity in dynamic environments. Alike the most typical approaches, the here introduced models allow investments to be transferred between areas losing conservation relevancy to the areas that gain relevancy. A fictitious (but plausible) conservation plan for ten mammal species in Iberian Peninsula up to 2080 is used to illustrate the setting-up and outputs of the models. Results evidence that the conservation effectiveness achieved in each model depends on singular spatio-temporal distribution relationships among species and between species and distinct land-uses. Planners should then investigate the sensitivity of their goals to distinct decision-support tools even when driven by similar designs and constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alagador D, Cerdeira J (2018) A quantitative analysis on the effects of critical factors limiting the effectiveness of species conservation in future-time. Ecol Evol 8(6):3457–3467

    Google Scholar 

  • Alagador D, Cerdeira JO (2017) Meeting species persistence targets under climate change: a spatially explicit conservation planning model. Divers Distrib 23(6):703–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alagador D, Cerdeira JO, Araújo MB (2016) Climate change, species range shifts and dispersal corridors: an evaluation of spatial conservation models. Methods Ecol Evol 7(7):853–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, Guisan A (2006) Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J Biogeogr 33(10):1677–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22(1):42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, Cabeza M, Thuiller W, Hannah L, Williams PH (2004) Would climate change drive species out of reserves? An assessment of existing reserve-selection methods. Glob Change Biol 10(9):1618–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, Alagador D, Cabeza M, Nogués-Bravo D, Thuiller W (2011a) Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecol Lett 14:484–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, Rozenfeld A, Rahbek C, Marquet PA (2011b) Using species co-occurrence networks to assess the impacts of climate change. Ecography 34(6):897–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd A, Hardiman A, Jennings K, Williams G (2010) Protected areas and climate change—reflections from a practitioner’s perspective. Utrech Law Rev 6(1):141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, McDonald-Madden E, Wilson KA, Carwardine J, Grantham HS, Watson JEM, Klein CJ, Green DC, Possingham HP (2010) Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes. Nature 466(7304):365–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia RA, Cabeza M, Rahbek C, Araújo MB (2014) Multiple dimensions of climate change and their implications for biodiversity. Science 344(6183):486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett 8(5):461–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L, Salm R (2003) Protected areas and climate change. In: Hannah L, Lovejoy T (eds) Climate change and biodiversity: synergistic impacts, vol 4. Advances in Applied Biodiversity Science. Conservation International, Washington DC, pp 91–100

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight AT, Cowling RM, Difford M, Campbell BM (2010) Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land. Conserv Biol 24(5):1348–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemes P, Loyola RD (2013) Accommodating species climate-forced dispersal and uncertainties in spatial conservation planning. PLoS ONE 8(1):e54323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir J, Hattab T, Pierre G (2017) Climatic microrefugia under anthropogenic climate change: implications for species redistribution. Ecography 40(2):253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neel MC, Cummings MP (2003) Effectiveness of conservation targets in capturing genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17(1):219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter KA, Arthur Woods H, Pincebourde S (2013) Microclimatic challenges in global change biology. Glob Change Biol 19(10):2932–2939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Cowling RM, Rouget M (2003) Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol Conserv 112(1–2):99–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon Y, McCarthy MA, Taylor P, Wintle BA (2013) Incorporating uncertainty of management costs in sensitivity analyses of matrix population models. Conserv Biol 27(1):134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott D, Lemieux C (2005) Climate change and protected area policy and planning in Canada. Forestry Chronicle 81(5):696–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon D, Dilkina B, Elmachtoub A, Finseth R, Sabharwal A, Conrad J, Gomes C, Shmoys D, Allen W, Amundsen O, Vaughan B (2010) Maximizing the spread of cascades using network design. In: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoo L, Hoffmann A, Garnett S, Pressey R, Williams Y, Taylor M, Falconi L, Yates C, Scott J, Alagador D, Williams S (2013) Making decisions to conserve species under climate change. Clim Change 119(2):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter O, Sanderson EW, Magrach A, Allan JR, Beher J, Jones KR, Possingham HP, Laurance WF, Wood P, Fekete BM, Levy MA, Watson JEM (2016) Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat Commun 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JC, ReVelle CS (1997) Applying mathematical programming to reserve selection. Environ Model Assess 2(3):167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SE, Shoo LP, Isaac JL, Hoffmann AA, Langham G (2008) Towards an integrated framework for assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change. PLoS Biol 6(12):e325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by FEDER funds through the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) and Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade—COMPETE—and was undertaken under the projects PTDC/AAG-GLO/3979/2014 (ref. 9471-RIDTI) and UID/MAT/00297/2013. DA received support through a FCT’s postdoctoral fellowship SFRH/BPD/104077/2014. Both authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diogo Alagador .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alagador, D., Cerdeira, J.O. (2019). Introducing Spatio-Temporal Conservation Units: Models for Flexible Optimization of Species Persistence Under Climate Change. In: Leal Filho, W., Barbir, J., Preziosi, R. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change and Biodiversity. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98681-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics