Advertisement

Isotone Galois Connections and Generalized One-Sided Concept Lattices

  • Peter ButkaEmail author
  • Jozef Pócs
  • Jana Pócsová
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 833)

Abstract

We provide an approach to one-sided (crisp-fuzzy) concept lattices based on isotone Galois connections. Isotone Galois connections and concept lattices provide an alternative to the classical, antitone Galois connections based concept lattices, which are fundamental structures in formal concept analysis of object-attribute models with many-valued attributes. Our approach is suitable for analysis of data tables with different structures for truth values of particular attributes. A possible applications of this approach for approximation of object subsets is also presented.

Keywords

Isotone Galois connection One-sided concept lattice Closure operator Interior operator Formal concept analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author was supported the Slovak VEGA grant no. 1/0493/16 and Slovak APVV grant no. APVV-16-0213. The second author was supported by the project of Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (GAČR) no. 18-06915S and by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-16-0073. The third author was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-14-0892.

References

  1. 1.
    Antoni, L., Krajči, S., Krídlo, O., Macek, B., Pisková, L.: On heterogeneous formal contexts. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 234, 22–33 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antoni, L., Krajči, S., Krídlo, O.: On stability of fuzzy formal concepts over randomized one-sided formal context. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 333, 36–53 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antoni, L., Krajči, S., Krídlo, O.: On fuzzy generalizations of concept lattices. Stud. Comput. Intell. 758, 79–103 (2018)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bělohlávek, R., Konecny, J.: Concept lattices of isotone vs. antitone Galois connections in graded setting: mutual reducibility revisited. Inf. Sci. 199, 133–137 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ben Yahia, S., Jaoua, A.: Discovering knowledge from fuzzy concept lattice. In: Kandel, A., Last, M., Bunke, H. (eds.) Data Mining and Computational Intelligence, Physica-Verlag, pp. 167–190 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brajerčík, J., Demko, M.: On sheaf spaces of partially ordered quasigroups. Quasigroups Relat. Syst. 22(1), 51–58 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Butka, P., Pócs, J.: Generalization of one-sided concept lattices. Comput. Informat. 32(2), 355–370 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Butka, P., Pócs, J., Pócsová, J.: Reduction of concepts from generalized one-sided concept lattice based on subsets quality measure. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 314, 101–111 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Butka, P., Pócs, J., Pócsová, J., Sarnovský, M.: Multiple data tables processing via one-sided concept lattices. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 183, 89–98 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Demko, M.: On congruences and ideals of partially ordered quasigroups. Czechoslovak Math. J. 58(3), 637–650 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Demko, M.: Lexicographic product decompositions of half linearly ordered loops. Czechoslovak Math. J. 57(2), 607–629 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krajči, S.: Cluster based efficient generation of fuzzy concepts. Neural Netw. World 13(5), 521–530 (2003)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krídlo, O., Krajči, S., Antoni, L.: Formal concept analysis of higher order. Int. J. Gener. Syst. 45(2), 116–134 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Medina, J., Ojeda-Aciego, M., Ruiz-Calviño, J.: Formal concept analysis via multi-adjoint concept lattices. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 160, 130–144 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and InformaticsTechnical University of KošiceKošiceSlovakia
  2. 2.Department of Algebra and Geometry, Faculty of SciencePalacký University OlomoucOlomoucCzech Republic
  3. 3.Mathematical Institute, Slovak Academy of SciencesKošiceSlovakia
  4. 4.Institute of Control and Informatization of Production Processes, BERG FacultyTechnical University of KošiceKošiceSlovakia

Personalised recommendations