Advertisement

Precursors of Endometrial Carcinoma

  • Tricia A. Murdock
  • Emanuela F. T. Veras
  • Robert J. Kurman
  • Michael T. Mazur
Chapter

Abstract

It has been well recognized since the 1970s that unopposed estrogenic stimulation leads to endometrial hyperplasia, which in turn has the potential to progress to the usual type of endometrial carcinoma, termed “endometrioid carcinoma.” More recently, another lesion designated “endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC)” has been shown to precede the development of invasive uterine serous carcinoma (USC). Because of its association with USC and not endometrioid carcinoma, it has been proposed that endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma be designated “serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma.” This chapter discusses the various types of endometrial carcinoma precursors and focuses on their mimickers. The World Health Organization’s WHO Classification of Tumours of the Female Reproductive Organs was revised in 2014, and several changes were made. This chapter reflects those changes.

Keywords

Endometrial carcinoma Endometrial hyperplasia Endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia Epithelial cytoplasmic carcinoma Atypical hyperplasia of endometrium Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma 

References

  1. 1.
    Sherman ME. Theories of endometrial carcinogenesis: a multidisciplinary approach. Mod Pathol. 2000;13:295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zaino R, Carinelli S, Ellenson L. Uterine corpus: epithelial tumours and precursors. In: Kurman R, Carcangiu M, Herrington C, Young R, editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours of the female reproductive organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2014. p. 125–35.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellenson LH, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ. Precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma. In: Ellenson LH, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ editors. Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2011 Chap 8 p. 359–91.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Silverberg SG, Kurman RJ. Tumors of the uterine corpus and gestational trophoblastic disease. Atlas of tumor pathology, 3rd series, Fascicle 3. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scully RE, Poulson H, Sobin LH. International histological classification and typing of female genital tract tumours. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silverberg SG, Kurman RJ, Nogales F, Matter GL, Kubik-Nutch RA, Tavassoli FA. Tumors of the uterine corpus. Epithelial tumours and related lesions. In: World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Travassoli FA, Devilee P, eds. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003: 221–232.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kendall BS, Ronnett BM, Isacson C, Cho KR, Hedrick L, Diener-West M, et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well – differentiated carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:1012–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergeron C, Nogales FF, Masseroli M, Abeler V, Duvillard P, Muller-Holzner E, et al. A multicentric European study testing the re-producibility of the WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia with a proposal of a simplified working classification for biopsy and curettage specimens. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:1102–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norris HJ, Tavassoli FA, Kurman RJ. Endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Diagnostic considerations. Am J Surg Pathol. 1983;7:839–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silverberg SG. Hyperplasia and carcinoma of the endometrium. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1988;5:135–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kraus FT. High–risk and premalignant lesions of the endometrium. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9(Suppl):31–40.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Welch WR, Scully RE. Precancerous lesions of the endometrium. Hum Pathol. 1977;8:503–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silverberg SG. Problems in the differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2000;13:309–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hendrickson MR, Kempson RL. Surgical pathology of the uterine corpus (Major problems in pathology series), vol. 12. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1980.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buckley CH, Fox H. Biopsy pathology of the endometrium. 2nd ed. London: Arnold; 2002.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tavassoli F, Kraus FT. Endometrial lesion in uteri resected for atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Am J Clin Pathol. 1978;70:772–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gurda GT, Baras AS, Kurman RJ. Ki-67 index as an ancillary tool in the differential diagnosis of proliferative endometrial lesions with secretory change. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2014;33(2):114–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lehman MB, Hart WR. Simple and complex hyperplastic papillary proliferations of the endometrium: A clinicopathologic study of nine cases of apparently localized papillary lesions with fibrovascular stromal cores and epithelial metaplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:1347–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ip PP, Irving JA, McCluggage WG, Clement PB, Young RH. Papillary proliferation of the endometrium: a clinicopathologic study of 59 cases of simple and complex papillae without cytologic atypia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(2):167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crum C, Lee K. Altered endometrial differentiation. In: Diagnostic gynecologic and obstetric pathology. Pennsylvania: Elsevier-Saunders; 2006. p. 538.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kurman RJ, Norris HJ. Evaluation of criteria for distinguishing atypical endometrial hyperplasia from well–differentiated carcinoma. Cancer. 1982;49:2547–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gray LA, Robertson RWJ, Christopherson WM. Atypical endometrial changes associated with carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1974;2:93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    King A, Seraj IM, Wagner RJ. Stromal invasion in endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;149:10–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mutter GL, Baak JP, Crum CP, Richart RM, Ferenczy A, Faquin WC. Endometrial precancer diagnosis by histopathology, clonal analysis, and computerized morphometry. J Pathol. 2000;190:462–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mutter GL, et al. Benign endometrial hyperplasia sequence and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2007;26:103–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mutter GL. Histopathology of genetically defined endometrial precancers. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2000;19:301–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mutter GL. Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN): Will it bring order to chaos? The Endometrial Collaborative Group. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;76:287–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baak JP. The role of computerized morphometric and cytometric feature analysis in endometrial hyperplasia and cancer prognosis. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1995;23:137–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baak JP, Orbo A, van Diest PJ, Jiwa M, de Bruin P, Broeckaert M, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the morphometric D-score for prediction of the outcome of endometrial hyperplasias. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:930–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Baak JP, Wisse-Brekelmans EC, Fleege JC, van der Putten HW, Bezemer PD. Assessment of the risk on endometrial cancer in hyperplasia, by means of morphological and morphometrical features. Pathol Res Pract. 1992;188:856–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baak JP, Nauta JJ, Wisse-Brekelmans EC, Bezemer PD. Architectural and nuclear morphometrical features together are more important prognosticators in endometrial hyperplasias than nuclear morphometrical features alone. J Pathol. 1988;154(4):335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baak JP, Mutter GL, Robboy S, et al. The molecular genetics and morphometry-based endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification system predicts disease progression in endometrial hyperplasia more accurately than the 1994 World Health Organization classification system. Cancer. 2005;103(11):2304–12. ReviewCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lacey JV Jr, Mutter GL, Nucci MR, Ronnett BM, Ioffe OB, Rush BB, Glass AG, Richesson DA, Chatterjee N, Langholz B, Sherman ME. Risk of subsequent endometrial carcinoma associated with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification of endometrial biopsies. Cancer. 2008 Oct 15;113(8):2073–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ordi, et al. Reproducibility of current classifications of endometrial endometrioid glandular proliferations: further evidence supporting a simplified classification. Histopathology. 2014;64:284–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gusberg SB, Kaplan AL. Precursors of corpus cancer. IV. Adenomatous hyperplasia as stage 0 carcinoma of the endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1963;87:662–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hertig AT, Sommers SC. Genesis of endometrial carcinoma. I. Study of prior biopsies. Cancer. 1949;2:946–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kurman RJ, Kaminski PF, Norris HJ. The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of “untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients. Cancer. 1985;56:403–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Deligdisch L, Cohen CJ. Histologic correlates and virulence implications of endometrial carcinoma associated with adenomatous hyperplasia. Cancer. 1985;56:1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Buehl IA, Vellios F, Carter JE, Huber CP. Carcinoma in situ of the endometrium. Am J Clin Pathol. 1964;42:594–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Campbell PE, Barter RA. The significance of atypical hyperplasia. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1961;68:668–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rakha E, Wong SC, Soomro I, Chaudry Z, Sharma A, Deen S, Chan S, Abu J, Nunns D, Williamson K, McGregor A, Hammond R, Brown L. Clinical outcome of atypical endometrial hyperplasia diagnosed on an endometrial biopsy: institutional experience and review of literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(11):1683–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Winkler B, Alvarez S, Richart RM, Crum CP. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of endometrial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64:185–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Crum CP, Richart RM, Fenoglio CM. Adenoacanthosis of the endometrium. A clinicopathologic study in premenopausal women. Am J Surg Pathol. 1981;5:15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hendrickson MR, Kempson RL. Endometrial epithelial metaplasias: proliferations frequently misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma. Report of 89 cases and proposed classification. Am J Surg Pathol. 1980;4:525–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Blaustein A. Morular metaplasia misdiagnosed as adenoacanthoma in young women with polycystic ovarian disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ. Precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma. In: Kurman R, editor. Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. 5th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002. p. 467–500.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bahçeci M, Demirel LC. Osseous metaplasia of the endometrium: a rare cause of infertility and its hysteroscopic management. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(11):2537–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gru AA, Hassan A, Pfeifer JD, Huettner PC. Uterine extramedullary hematopoiesis: what is the clinical significance? Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;29(4):366–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Stewart CJ, Leake R. Endometrial synovial-like metaplasia associated with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2015;34(6):570–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dutra F. Intraglandular morules of the endometrium. Am J Clin Pathol. 1959;31:60–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Andersen WA, Taylor PT, Fechner RE, Pinkerton JAV. Endometrial metaplasia associated with endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:597–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kaku T, Tsukamoto N, Tsuruchi N, Sugihara K, Kamura T, Nakano H. Endometrial metaplasia associated with endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:812–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Houghton O, Connolly LE, McCluggage WG. Morules in endometroid proliferations of the uterus and ovary consistently express the intestinal transcription factor CDX2. Histopathology. 2008;53:156–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Masterson R, Armstrong EM, More IAR. The cyclical variation in the percentage of ciliated cells in the normal human endometrium. J Reprod Fertil. 1975;42:537–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zaman SS, Mazur MT. Endometrial papillary syncytial change. A nonspecific alteration associated with active breakdown. Am J Clin Pathol. 1993;99:741–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rorat E, Wallach RC. Papillary metaplasia of the endometrium: clinical and histopathologic considerations. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64:90S–2S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Talia KL, Stewart CJR, Howitt BE, Nucci MR, McCluggage WG. HPV-negative gastric type adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: a spectrum of rare lesions exhibiting gastric and intestinal differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(8):1023–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nucci MR, Prasad CJ, Crum CP, Mutter GL. Mucinous endometrial epithelial proliferations: a morphologic spectrum of changes with diverse clinical significance. Mod Pathol. 1999;12:1137–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Vang R, Tavassoli FA. Proliferative mucinous lesions of the endometrium: analysis of existing criteria for diagnosing carcinoma in biopsies and curettings. Int J Surg Pathol. 2003;11:261–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tresserra F, Lopez-Yarto M, Grases PJ, Ubeda A, Pascual MA, Labastida R. Endometrial hyperplasia with secretory changes. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88:386–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ambros RA, Sherman ME, Zahn CM, Bitter-man P, Kurman RJ. Endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma: a distinctive lesion specifically associated with tumors displaying serous differentiation. Hum Pathol. 1995;26:1260–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    McCluggage WG, Sumathi VP, McManus DT. Uterine serous carcinoma and endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma arising in endometrial polyps: report of 5 cases, including 2 associated with tamoxifen therapy. Hum Pathol. 2003;34:939–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Soslow RA, Pirog E, Isacson C. Endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma with associated peritoneal carcinomatosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:726–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wheeler DT, Bell KA, Kurman RJ, Sherman ME. Minimal uterine serous carcinoma: diagnosis and clinicopathologic correlation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:797–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zheng W, Khurana R, Farahmand S, Wang Y, Zhang ZF, Felix JC. p53 immunostaining as a significant adjunct diagnostic method for uterine surface carcinoma: precursor of uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:1463–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sherman ME, Bur ME, Kurman RJ. p53 in endometrial cancer and its putative precursors: Evidence for diverse pathways of tumorigenesis. Hum Pathol. 1995;26:1268–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tashiro H, Isacson C, Levine R, Kurman RJ, Cho KR, Hedrick L. p53 gene mutations are common in uterine serous carcinoma and occur early in their pathogenesis. Am J Pathol. 1997;150:177–85.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Köbel M, Ronnett BM, Singh N, Soslow RA, Gilks CB, McCluggage WG. Interpretation of P53 Immunohistochemistry in endometrial carcinomas: toward increased reproducibility. Int J Gynecol Pathol. Mar 6, 2018. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    McCluggage WG. Recent advances in immunohistochemistry in gynaecological pathology. Histopathology. 2002;40:309–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zheng W, Xiang L, Fadare O, et al. A proposed model for endometrial serous carcinogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:e1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Fadare O, Liang SX, Ulukus EC, Chambers SK, Zheng W. Precursors of endometrial clear cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(12):1519–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Fadare O, Zheng W, Crispens MA, et al. Morphologic and other clinicopathologic features of endometrial clear cell carcinoma: a comprehensive analysis of 50 rigorously classified cases. Am J Cancer Res. 2013;3(1):70–95.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Baergen RN, Warren CD, Isacson C, Ellenson LH. Early uterine serous carcinoma: clonal origin of extrauterine disease. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2001;20:214–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2011–2014, NCHS Data Brief, No 219; November 2015.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
  76. 76.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion. Number 631; May 2015.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Erkanli S, Ayhan A. Fertility-sparing therapy in young women with endometrial cancer: 2010 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20(7):1170–87. Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin, clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, number 65, August 2005: management of endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(2):413–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tricia A. Murdock
    • 1
  • Emanuela F. T. Veras
    • 1
  • Robert J. Kurman
    • 1
  • Michael T. Mazur
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PathologyThe Johns Hopkins HospitalBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineState University of New York Upstate Medical UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations