Which Learning Visualisations to Offer Students?

  • Susan BullEmail author
  • Peter Brusilovsky
  • Julio Guerra
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11082)


Research on learning visualisations does not always consider open learner models (OLM), where visualisations support learner decision-making. A range of preferences has been found, but studies mostly compare visualisations within single systems, so some have not yet been contrasted. This paper: (i) offers OLM researchers further results based on screenshots that include a broader range of visualisations than previously; (ii) introduces OLM views for the attention of those in other e-learning fields, as these may be relevant to their context.


Learning visualisations Learner preferences Open Learner Model 


  1. 1.
    Bodily, R., Kay, J., Aleven, V., Davis, D., Jivet, I., Xhakaj, F., Verbert, K.: Open learner models and learning analytics dashboards: a systematic review. In: LAK. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwendimann, B.A., et al.: Understanding learning at a glance: an overview of learning dashboard studies. In: LAK, pp. 532–533. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bull, S., Kay, J.: SMILI☺: a framework for interfaces to learning data in open learner models, learning analytics and related fields. IJAIED 26(1), 293–331 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bull, S., Johnson, M.D., Masci, D., Biel, C.: Integrating and visualising diagnostic information for the benefit of learning. In: Reimann, P., Bull, S., Kickmeier-Rust, M., Vatrapu, R.K., Wasson, B. (eds.) Measuring and Visualizing Learning in the Information-Rich Classroom, pp. 167–180. Routledge Taylor & Francis, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bull, S., Mabbott, A.: 20000 inspections of a domain-independent open learner model with individual and comparison views. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 422–432. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brusilovsky, P., Yudelson, M.V.: From WebEx to NavEx: interactive access to annotated program examples. Proc. IEEE 96(6), 990–999 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brusilovsky, P., Somyürek, S., Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Zadorozhny, V.: The value of social: comparing open student modeling and open social student modeling. In: Ricci, F., Bontcheva, K., Conlan, O., Lawless, S. (eds.) UMAP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9146, pp. 44–55. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brusilovsky, P., Baishya, D., Hosseini, R., Guerra, J., Liang, M.: KnowledgeZoom for Java: a concept-based exam study tool with a zoomable open student model. In: ICALT. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hsiao, I.-H., Bakalov, F., Brusilovsky, P., König-Ries, B.: Progressor: social navigation support through open social student modeling. NRHM 19(2), 112–131 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mabbott, A., Bull, S.: Student preferences for editing, persuading, and negotiating the open learner model. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 481–490. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duan, D., Mitrovic, A., Churcher, N.: Evaluating the effectiveness of multiple open student models in EER-tutor. In: ICCE, APSCE, pp. 86–88 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bull, S., Brusilovsky, P., Guerra, J., Araujo, R.: Individual and Peer Comparison Open Learner Model Visualisations to Identify What to Work On Next, UMAP-Ext LBR4 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maries, A., Kumar, A.: Effect of Student Model on Learning. In: ICALT, pp. 877–881 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guerra-Hollstein, J., Barria-Pineda, J., Schunn, C.D., Bull, S., Brusilovsky, P.: Fine-grained open learner models: complexity versus support. In: UMAP. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Law, C-Y., Grundy, J., Cain, A., Vasa, R.: A preliminary study of open learner model representation formats to support formative assessment. In: COMPSAC, p. 887. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nielsen, J.: First Rule of Usability? Don’t Listen to Users. Nielsen Norman Group (2001). Accessed 23 June 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ConsultantBirminghamUK
  2. 2.School of Information SciencesUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Instituto de InformáticaUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile

Personalised recommendations