Abstract
Predicting academic performance has been a topic of research for years, with different factors having been used to predict student grades. One of those factors is personality, with little work having focused on the effect of personality on academic performance in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Contributing to our lack of understanding of how personality is linked to academic performance in MOOCs, studies that predict academic performance by combining personality with attributes of online course design to have yet to be reported. In this paper, we try to tackle this problem by using personality and level of collaboration (a course attribute) to predict academic performance. We chose level of collaboration as one of the course attributes in our research because social factors, such as the amount of student interaction, can impact learner attrition in MOOCs. We apply machine learning algorithms to two different feature sets. The first feature set only uses personality as a predictor and the second feature set uses personality and level of collaboration in a course as predictors of academic performance. A comparison of these predictive models revealed that adding level of collaboration can increase their performance significantly. These results provide further evidence of the importance of validating classroom-based research in online settings. Moreover, the results of this work can be useful in several ways. For example, we may be able to give better recommendations to users based on their personality and the attributes of courses. We may also be able to adapt course attributes to match the personality characteristics of each student.
Keywords
- Personality
- Course attributes
- MOOC
- Educational data mining
- Learning analytics
- Grade prediction
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Landers, R.N., Lounsbury, J.W.: An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to internet usage. Comput. Hum. Behav. 22, 283–293 (2006)
Kloft, M., Stiehler, F., Zheng, Z., Pinkwart, N.: Predicting MOOC dropout over weeks using machine learning methods. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs (2014)
Muilenburg, L.Y., Berge, Z.L.: Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study. Distance Educ. 26, 29–48 (2005)
Rosé, C.P., Carlson, R., Yang, D., Wen, M., Resnick, L., Goldman, P., Sherer, J.: Social factors that contribute to attrition in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference - L@S 2014 (2014)
Gütl, C., Rizzardini, R.H., Chang, V., Morales, M.: Attrition in MOOC: lessons learned from drop-out students. In: Uden, L., Sinclair, J., Tao, Y.-H., Liberona, D. (eds.) LTEC 2014. CCIS, vol. 446, pp. 37–48. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10671-7_4
Zheng, Z., Vogelsang, T., Pinkwart, N.: The impact of small learning group composition on student engagement and success in a MOOC. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Educational Data Mining, pp. 500–503 (2015)
Komarraju, M., Karau, S.J., Schmeck, R.R., Avdic, A.: The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Pers. Individ. Differ. 51, 472–477 (2011)
Jiang, S., Williams, A., Schenke, K., Warschauer, M., O’dowd, D.: Predicting MOOC performance with week 1 behavior. In: Educational Data Mining 2014 (2014)
Komarraju, M., Karau, S.J., Schmeck, R.R.: Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students academic motivation and achievement. Learn. Individ. Differ. 19, 47–52 (2009)
Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann, W.B.: A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J. Res. Pers. 37, 504–528 (2003)
Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K.: The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 44, 1–26 (1991)
Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.: Neo personality inventory-revised: (NEO PI-R). Psychological Assessment Resources, Florida (1992)
Schmeck, R.R., Ribich, F., Ramanaiah, N.: Development of a self-report inventory for assessing individual differences in learning processes. Appl. Psychol. Measur. 1, 413–431 (1977)
Agresti, A.: Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley-Interscience, New York (2002)
Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297 (1995)
Chen, G., Davis, D., Hauff, C., Houben, G.J.: On the impact of personality in massive open online learning. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 121–130. ACM (2016)
Rose, D.: Personality as it relates to learning styles in online courses. In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 827–831. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2012)
Demmans Epp, C., Phirangee, K., Hewitt, J.: Student actions and community in online courses: the roles played by course length and facilitation method. Online Learn. 21, 53–77 (2017)
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C.: Pedagogical biases in educational technologies. Educ. Technol. 48, 3–11 (2008)
Demmans Epp, C., Phirangee, K., Hewitt, J.: Talk with Me: student behaviours and pronoun use as indicators of discourse health across facilitation methods. J. Learn. Anal. 4, 47–75 (2017)
Rovai, A.P.: Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. Internet High. Educ. 5, 197–211 (2002)
Phirangee, K., Demmans Epp, C., Hewitt, J.: Exploring the relation-ships between facilitation methods, students’ sense of community and their online behaviours. Special Issue Online Learn. Anal. Online Learn. J. 20, 134–154 (2016)
Richardson, J.C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., Caskurlu, S.: Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: a meta-analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 71, 402–417 (2017)
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 2, 87–105 (1999)
Baikadi, A., Schunn, C.D., Long, Y., Demmans Epp, C.: Redefining “What” in analyses of who does what in MOOCs. In: 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2016), pp. 569–570. International Educational Data Mining Society (IEDMS), Raleigh (2016)
Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., Schneider, E.: Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In: Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK), pp. 170–179. ACM, New York (2013)
Kizilcec, R.F., Halawa, S.: Attrition and achievement gaps in online learning. In: Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, pp. 57–66. ACM, New York (2015)
Kuhn, M.: Applied Predictive Modeling. Springer, New York (2016)
Kotsiantis, S., Kanellopoulos, D.: Discretization techniques: a recent survey. GESTS Int. Trans. Comput. Sci. Eng. 32(1), 47–58 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rahmani Hanzaki, M., Demmans Epp, C. (2018). The Effect of Personality and Course Attributes on Academic Performance in MOOCs. In: Pammer-Schindler, V., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Drachsler, H., Elferink, R., Scheffel, M. (eds) Lifelong Technology-Enhanced Learning. EC-TEL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11082. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98571-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98572-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)