Predicting Learners’ Success in a Self-paced MOOC Through Sequence Patterns of Self-regulated Learning
In the past years, predictive models in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have focused on forecasting learners’ success through their grades. The prediction of these grades is useful to identify problems that might lead to dropouts. However, most models in prior work predict categorical and continuous variables using low-level data. This paper contributes to extend current predictive models in the literature by considering coarse-grained variables related to Self-Regulated Learning (SRL). That is, using learners’ self-reported SRL strategies and MOOC activity sequence patterns as predictors. Lineal and logistic regression modelling were used as a first approach of prediction with data collected from N = 2,035 learners who took a self-paced MOOC in Coursera. We identified two groups of learners: (1) Comprehensive, who follow the course path designed by the teacher; and (2) Targeting, who seek for the information required to pass assessments. For both type of learners, we found a group of variables as the most predictive: (1) the self-reported SRL strategies ‘goal setting’, ‘strategic planning’, ‘elaboration’ and ‘help seeking’; (2) the activity sequences patterns ‘only assessment’, ‘complete a video-lecture and try an assessment’, ‘explore the content’ and ‘try an assessment followed by a video-lecture’; and (3) learners’ prior experience, together with the self-reported interest in course assessments, and the number of active days and time spent in the platform. These results show how to predict with more accuracy when students reach a certain status taking in to consideration not only low-level data, but complex data such as their SRL strategies.
KeywordsSelf-regulated learning Prediction Massive Open Online Courses Sequence patterns Achievement Success
This work was supported by FONDECYT (Chile) under project initiation grant No.11150231, the MOOC-Maker Project (561533-EPP-1-2015-1-ES-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP), the LALA Project (586120-EPP-1-2017-1-ES-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP), and CONICYT/DOCTORADO NACIONAL 2016/21160081, the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport, under an FPU fellowship (FPU016/00526) and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competiveness (Smartlet project, grant number TIN2017-85179-C3-1-R) funded by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER).
- 8.Chuang, I., Ho, A.D.: HarvardX and MITx: Four Years of Open Online Courses–Fall 2012-Summer 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
- 9.Corrin, L., et al.: Using learning analytics to explore help-seeking learner profiles in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, pp. 424–428 (2017)Google Scholar
- 11.Grainger, B.: Massive open online course (MOOC) report 2013. University of London. (2013)Google Scholar
- 12.Günther, C.W., Rozinat, A.: Disco: discover your processes. Bus. Process Manag. 940, 40–44 (2012)Google Scholar
- 15.Kocdar, S., et al.: Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 19, 1 (2018)Google Scholar
- 16.Kovanović, V. et al.: Penetrating the black box of time-on-task estimation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference Learning Analytics and Knowledge - LAK 2015. October, pp. 184–193 (2015)Google Scholar
- 20.Maldonado, J.J., et al.: Exploring differences in how learners navigate in MOOCs based on self-regulated learning and learning styles: A process mining approach. In: Computing Conference (CLEI), 2016 XLII Latin American, pp. 1–12 (2016)Google Scholar
- 21.Mezaour, A.-D.: Filtering web documents for a thematic warehouse case study: eDot a food risk data warehouse (extended). In: Kłopotek, M.A., Wierzchoń, S.T., Trojanowski, K. (eds.) Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining. Advances in Soft Computing, vol. 31, pp. 269–278. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32392-9_28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Moreno-Marcos, P.M., et al.: Analysing the predictive power for anticipating assignment grades in a massive open online course. Behav. Inf. Technol. 37(5), 1–16 (2018)Google Scholar
- 23.Pardo, A. et al.: Generating actionable predictive models of academic performance. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 474–478 (2016)Google Scholar
- 25.Sinha, T. et al.: Your click decides your fate: Inferring information processing and attrition behavior from mooc video clickstream interactions. arXiv Prepr. arXiv1407.7131. (2014)Google Scholar
- 28.Zhao, C., et al.: Discover learning behavior patterns to predict certification. In: 2016 11th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), pp. 69–73 (2016)Google Scholar