Advertisement

Integration of Cloud-Fog Based Environment with Smart Grid

  • Hanan Butt
  • Nadeem Javaid
  • Muhammad Bilal
  • Syed Aon Ali Naqvi
  • Talha Saif
  • Komal Tehreem
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 23)

Abstract

Smart grid (SG) is an efficient electrical grid that provides opportunities to manage the energy load in a reliable and efficient way. Moreover, smart meters (SMs) are introduced, which play a vital role in communication between homes and SG. SMs manage and monitor the energy consumption of homes. SGs and SMs produce a big data, which is very hard to store and process even with cloud computing. For this purpose fog computing concept is introduced, which provides a good environment for computing and storing the data of SGs and SMs before transmitting them to cloud. The concept of fog computing, acts as a bridge between cloud and SGs. In this paper, a cloud-fog based architecture is integrated with SG for efficient energy management of buildings with SMs. To manage the energy requirements of consumers, micro grids (MGs) are available near to the buildings. Fogs are distributed over the world, overhaul the cloud via important features, including low latency and increased security for MGs. To balance the load on cloud and fogs, three load balancing algorithms are used. These algorithms are round robin (RR), throttled and greedy. Closest datacenter policy is used to compare their results. Greedy gives better results than RR and throttled.

Keywords

Micro grid Smart grid Cloud computing Fog computing Greedy algorithm Load balancing Virtual machine 

References

  1. 1.
    Al Faruque, M.A., Vatanparvar, K.: Energy management-as-a-service over fog computing platform. IEEE Internet Things J. 3(2), 161–169 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nisar, A., Thomas, M.S.: Comprehensive control for microgrid autonomous operation with demand response. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(5), 2081–2089 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lehrig, S.: CloudStoretowards scalability, elasticity, and efficiency benchmarking and analysis in cloud computing. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 78, 115–126 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao, Z.: Optimal cloud computing resource allocation for demand side management in smart grid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(4), 1943–1955 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Narayan, A., et al.: Resource procurement, allocation, metering, and pricing in cloud computing. In: Research Advances in Cloud Computing, pp. 141–186. Springer, Singapore (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fatima, I., Javaid, N., Iqbal, M.N., Shafi, I., Anjum, A., Memon, U.: Integration of cloud and fog based environment for effective resource distribution in smart buildings. In: 14th IEEE International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC-2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moghaddam, M.H.Y., Leon-Garcia, A., Moghaddassian, M.: On the performance of distributed and cloud-based demand response in smart grid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yaghmaee, M.H., Moghaddassian, M., Garcia, A.L.: Power consumption scheduling for future connected smart homes using bi-level cost-wise optimization approach. In: Smart City 360, pp. 326–338. Springer, Cham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Damavandi, Ghasemi, M., Marti, J.R., Krishnamurthy, V.: A methodology for optimal distributed storage planning in smart distribution grids. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fang, B.: The contributions of cloud technologies to smart grid. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 59, 1326–1331 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pham, N.M.N., Le, V.S.: Applying ant colony system algorithm in multi-objective resource allocation for virtual services. J. Inf. Telecommun. 1(4), 319–333 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pujara, A.: A novel approach for UI charge reduction using AMI based load prioritization in smart grid. J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 4(2), 338–346 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao, C.: Consensus-based energy management in smart grid with transmission losses and directed communication. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(5), 2049–2061 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Celik, B., et al.: A comparison of three parallel processing methods for a resource allocation problem in the smart grid. In: 2017 North American Power Symposium (NAPS). IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, H., Wang, Z., Domingo-Ferrer, J.: Anonymous and secure aggregation scheme in fog-based public cloud computing. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 78, 712–719 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yolda, Y.: Enhancing smart grid with microgrids: challenges and opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 72, 205–214 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lagwal, M., Bhardwaj, N.: A survey on load balancing methods and algorithms in cloud computing, pp. 46–51 (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nadeem, Z., Nadeem, J., Malik, A.W., Iqbal, S.: Scheduling appliances with GA, TLBO, FA, OSR and their hybrids using chance constrained optimization for smart homes. Energies 11(4), 888 (2018) ISSN: 1996-1073.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Razzaghzadeh, S.: Probabilistic modeling to achieve load balancing in expert clouds. Ad Hoc Netw. 59, 12–23 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mangla, P., Goyal, S.K.: Heuristic vs meta-heuristic approaches for load balancing in cloud environment (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chekired, D.A., Khoukhi, L.: Smart grid solution for charging and discharging services based on cloud computing scheduling. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 13(6), 3312–3321 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nikhit, P., Lilhore, U.M., Agrawal, N.: A hybrid ACHBDF load balancing method for optimum resource utilization. In: Cloud Computing (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Javaid, N., Ahmed, A., Iqbal, S., Ashraf, M.: Day ahead real time pricing and critical peak pricing based power scheduling for smart homes with different duty cycles. Energies 11(6), 1464 (2018). ISSN: 1996-1073.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gupta, H., et al.: iFogSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in the Internet of Things, edge and fog computing environments. Softw. Pract. Exp. 47(9), 1275–1296 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wickremasinghe, B., Buyya, R.: CloudAnalyst: a cloudsim-based tool for modelling and analysis of large scale cloud computing environments. MEDC project report 22(6), 433–659 (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shi, L., Zhang, Z., Robertazzi, T.: Energy-aware scheduling of embarrassingly parallel jobs and resource allocation in cloud. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 28(6), 1607–1620 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li, D., Wu, J.: Minimizing energy consumption for frame-based tasks on heterogeneous multiprocessor platforms. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 26(3), 810–823 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xu, M., Tian, W., Buyya, R.: A survey on load balancing algorithms for virtual machines placement in cloud computing. Concurrency Comput. Pract. Exp. 29(12), e4123 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thakur, P., Mahajan, M.: Different scheduling algorithm in cloud computing: a survey. Int. J. Modern Comput. Sci. 5(1), (2017)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tani, H.G., El Amrani, C.: Smarter round robin scheduling algorithm for cloud computing and big data. J. Data Mining Digit Hum. (2018)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parida, S., Panchal, B.: Review paper on throttled load balancing algorithm in cloud computing environment (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanan Butt
    • 1
  • Nadeem Javaid
    • 1
  • Muhammad Bilal
    • 2
  • Syed Aon Ali Naqvi
    • 1
  • Talha Saif
    • 1
  • Komal Tehreem
    • 1
  1. 1.COMSATS UniversityIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.School of Computing and ITTaylor’s UniversitySubang JayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations