Skip to main content

Deciphering Ownership of Family Business Groups

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Family Business Group Phenomenon

Abstract

Family business groups are highly complex ownership structures. In this chapter, we suggest that owning a family business group needs to create benefits that overcome the transaction costs and ownership costs emerging from the complexities of ownership. We separate the effects of ownership into two main categories: the legal effects and the emotional effects. In terms of legal ownership, the control over the business and its resources suggests a freedom to operate the businesses and claims on their resources, to append new businesses to the FBG, to organize their relationships between the separate businesses and to exit from the businesses at will. The emotional benefits include the service of the owners’ self-deserving interests, positive effects on the family cohesion and togetherness and growth in social recognition and status. It seems that ownership along with its multiple effects may play a more vital role in explaining the development of family business groups than has been previously thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuvia, A.C. 2005. Beyond the Extended Self: Loved Objects and Consumers’ Identity Narratives. Journal of Consumer Research. 32 (1): 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, H., and D. Wolfenzon. 2006. A Theory of Pyramidal Ownership and Family Business Groups. The Journal of Finance 61 (6): 2637–2680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R.C., and D.M. Reeb. 2003. Founding Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance 58: 1301–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Craig E., and John L. Ward. 1996. Family Business Governance: Maximizing Family and Business Potential. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astrachan, Joseph H., and Peter Jaskiewicz. 2008. Emotional Returns and Emotional Costs in Privately Held Family Businesses: Advancing Traditional Business Valuation. Family Business Review 21 (2): 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, J., J. Kang, and K.S. Park. 2004. Corporate Governance and Firm Value: Evidence from the Korean Financial Crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 71 (2): 205–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J.R., O.S. Mitchell, C.K. Soo, and D. Bravo. 2012. How Financial Literacy Affects Household Wealth Accumulation. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 102 (3): 300–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R.W. 1988. Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research 15: 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard, Fabian, and Michael P. O’Driscoll. 2011. Psychological Ownership in Small Family-Owned Businesses: Leadership Style and Nonfamily-Employees Work Attitudes and Behaviors. Group & Organization Management. 36 (3): 345–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundin, Elin, E.F. Samuelsson, and Leif Melin. 2005. The Family Ownership Logic – Core Characteristics of Family Controlled Businesses. Paper Presented at the Family Business Network 16th World Conference, Brussels, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., and M. Ram. 2003. Reassessing Portfolio Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 21 (4): 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J.J., J.H. Chua, and Shaker A. Zahra. 2003. Crating Wealth in Family Firms Through Managing Resources: Comments and Extensions. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practise 27 (4): 359–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, Stijn, Simeon Djankov, Joseph P.H. Fan, and Larry H.P. Lang. 1999. The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocutz, J.T. (1953). Does Social Ownership Have Any Meaning? Ethics 64 (1): 46–50. Published by: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colli, A. 2003. The History of Family Business. Cambridge: Economic History Society, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Visscher, F.M., C.E. Aronoff, and J.L. Ward. 1995. Financing Transitions; Managing Capital and Liquidity in the Family Business. Marietta: Business Owner Resource.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, Manolio. 2017. From Family Businesses to Business Groups. In Understanding Family-Owned Business Groups. Palgrave Studies in Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Growth. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. 1988. Ownership, Control, and the Firm. In The Organization of Economic Activity. Vol. 1. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H. 1992. The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: To Have Is Not to Be. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhardt, O., E. Nowak, and F.-M. Weber 2005. ‘Running in the Family’ The Evolution of Ownership, Control, and Performance in German Family-Owned Firms 1903–2003, Working Paper. University of Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M. 1962. Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review. 27 (1): 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errington, A.J., and M. Lobley. 2002. Handing Over the Reins; a Comparative Study of Intergenerational Farm Transfers in England, France, Canada and USA. Paper Presented at the Meeting of the Agricultural Economics Society, Aberystwyth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furby, L. 1980. The Origins and Early Development of Possessive Behaviour. Political Psychology 2 (1): 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, K.E., J.A. Davis, M.M. Hampton, and I. Lansberg. 1997. Generation to Generation, Life Cycles of the Family Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, K.E., I. Lansberg, M. Desjardins, and B. Dunn. 1999. Stages and Transitions: Managing Change in the Family Business. Family Business Review 12 (4): 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, Aiden P., Nikhila Mahadevan, and Constantine Sedikides. 2018. Taking the High Ground: The Impact of Social Status on the Derogation of Ideological Opponents. Social Cognition 36 (1): 43–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunebaum, J.O. 1987. Private Ownership. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T.G., and J. Pistrui. 2002. Enterprising Families Domain: Family-Influenced Ownership Groups in Pursuit of Transgenerational Wealth. Family Business Review 15 (3): 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T., M. Williams, and I.C. MacMillan. 2003. A Unified Systems Perspective of Family Firm Performance. Journal of Business Venturing 18 (5): 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. 2005. Beyond the Legal: Psychological Ownership and Responsibility in the Family Business. Paper Presented at the FBN 16th Annual World Conference, Brussels, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A., L. Melin, and M. Nordqvist. 2001. Entrepreneurship as Radical Change in the Family Business: Exploring the Role of Cultural Patterns. Family Business Review 14 (3): 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, Frank, and Trudy G. Verser. 1994. Emerging Business, Emerging Field: Entrepreneurship and the Family Firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 19 (1): 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikävalko, Markku, Timo Pihkala, and Sascha Kraus. 2010. The Role of Owner-Managers’ Psychological Ownership in SME Strategic Behavior. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. 23 (3): 461–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, D.T., and S.H. Lane. 2004. Sustaining a Family Dynasty: Key Issues Facing Complex Multigenerational Business- and Investment-Owning Families. Family Business Review 17 (1): 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K.A., and E.A. Mannix. 2001. The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. Academy of Management Journal 44 (2): 238–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B., and M. Huse. 2000. Recruiting Outside Board Members in the Small Family Business: An Ideological Challenge. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 12 (4): 353–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Simon, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2000. Tunnelling. American Economic Review 90 (2): 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, S.E. (2007). The Family Business: Statistics, Profiles and Peculiarities. Business Management Dept.-De La Salle University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussila, Iiro. 2007. Omistajuus asiakasomisteisissa osuuskunnissa [eng. Ownership in Customer-owned Co-operatives (Doctoral Dissertation)]. Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis 271. ISBN 978-952-214-408-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson Stider, A. 2002. Familjen & Firman. Ph.D. Thesis, EFI. The Economic Research Institute at the Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellermanns, F.W., and K. Eddleston. 2006. Corporate Entrepreneurship in Family Firms: A Family Perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30 (6): 809–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., and Y. Yafeh. 2007. Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Paragons or Parasites? Journal of Economic Literature 45 (2): 331–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.-B., and C.H. Yi. 2006. Ownership Structure, Business Group Affiliation, Listing Status, and Earnings Management: Evidence from Korea. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (2): 427–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon, M.L., and K.V. Lins. 2003. Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value: Evidence from the East Asian Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance 58 (4): 1445–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, F.B., J.M. Podolny, and L. Tao. 2009. A Sociological (De)construction of the Relationship Between Status and Quality. American Journal of Sociology 115: 755–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkimattila, M., M. Rautiainen, and T. Pihkala. 2016. Systemic Innovation in Complex Business Portfolios – A Case Study. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research 10 (2/3): 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila, J., and M. Ikävalko. 2003. Participative Strategy Process in a Professional Organization and the Concept of Psychological Ownership. Paper Presented in NORDFEK Conference, Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglino, B.M., and E.C. Ravlin. 1998. Individual Values in Organizations: Concepts, Controversies, and Research. Journal of Management 24: 351–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, B. 2006. I, Me and Mine – How Products Become Consumers’ Extended Selves. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 5 (5): 550–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, C.A. 1994. Corporate Diversification. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (3): 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustakallio, M., E. Autio, and S. Zahra. 2002. Relational and Contractual Governance in Family Firms: Effects on Strategic Decision Making. Family Business Review 15 (3): 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordqvist, M. (2005). Understanding the Role of Ownership in Strategizing: A Study of Family Firms, JIBS Dissertation Series, No. 29. Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, Alessandro, and Fabrizio Castellucci. 2013. Status in Organization and Management Theory. Journal of Management. 40 (1): 287–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J.L., T. Kostova, and K.T. Dirks. 2001. Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations. Academy of Management Review 26 (2): 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research. A Review of General Psychology 7 (1): 84–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautiainen, M. 2012. Dynamic Ownership in Family Business Systems – A Portfolio Approach. Dissertation. Acta universitatis Lappeenrantaensis 485, Lappeenranta University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C.L., and K.G. Erickson. 2000. Creating and Spreading Status Beliefs. American Journal of Sociology 106: 579–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandford, C. 1984. Economics of Public Finance. 3rd ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneper, W.D., S. Celo, and N.K. Jain. 2008. Agents, Altruism, and Corporate Governance: The Impact of Family Ownership on Non-executive Compensation and Training. Proceedings of ASBBS 15 (1): 1340–1352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W.S., M.H. Lubatkin, and R.N. Dino. 2003. Exploring the Agency Consequences of Ownership Dispersion Among the Directors of Private Family Firms. Academy of Management Journal 46: 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwass, J. 2008. Dealing with the Complexity of Family Business; Strategies for Long-Term Success. Lausanne: IMD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwass, J., and A.A. Diversé. 2006. Private Wealth: Origin and Destination from Entrepreneurship to Family Offices. IMD, Perspective for Managers No. 140, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M., and P. Rosa. 1996. Has Firm Level Analysis Reached Its Limits? Time for a Rethink. International Small Business Journal 14 (4): 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., and M.B. Brewer. 2001. Individual Self, Relational Self, and Collective Self. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., J.J. Chrisman, and J.H. Chua. 2003. Succession Planning as Planned Behavior: Some Empirical Results. Family Business Review 16 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skvoretz, J., and T.J. Fararo. 1996. Status and Participation in Task Groups: A Dynamic Network Model. American Journal of Sociology 101: 1366–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B.A. 1976. Collective Ownership, Property Rights, and Control of the Corporation. Journal of Economic Issues 10 (2): 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sund, L.-G., and P.-O. Bjuggren. 2008. Protection of Ownership in Family Firms, the Owner and Management Perspective. Paper Presented at the Bangkok International Forum on Indigenous Management Practice (BIFIM), Kasetsart University, Bangkok.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. 2002. Freeing the Shackles of Family Business Ownership. Family Business Review 15 (4): 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Tom, and Steven Blader. 2003. The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 7 (4): 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran, D., P. Westhead, and M. Wright. 2001. The Focus of Entrepreneurial Research: Contextual and Process Issues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 25 (4): 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J.L. 1997. Growing the Family Business: Special Challenges and Best Practices. Family Business Review 10 (4): 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Developing Effective Ownership in the Family Controlled Business. Director’s Monthly 25 (7): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., D. Ucbasaran, and M. Wright. 2005. Decisions, Actions, and Performance: Do Novice, Serial, and Portfolio Entrepreneurs Differ? Journal of Small Business Management 43 (4): 393–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, J.M. 1991. Dynamics of Family Development: The Theory of Family Development. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo Pihkala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pihkala, T., Goel, S., Rautiainen, M., Mukherjee, K., Ikävalko, M. (2019). Deciphering Ownership of Family Business Groups. In: Rautiainen, M., Rosa, P., Pihkala, T., Parada, M.J., Cruz, A.D. (eds) The Family Business Group Phenomenon. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98542-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics