Skip to main content

Measurement Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Is Corruption Curable?
  • 676 Accesses

Abstract

Talking about corruption, its prevalence, causes, consequences, and differences across countries implies the ability to measure the phenomenon. For a long time, due to a lack of systematic investigations and data collection, the magnitude of corruption had to be assessed using anecdotal or case-study evidence. Since the 1980s, a number of national and international institutions as well as NGOs have devoted remarkable efforts to helping document the scale of corruption. Broadly speaking, there are three groups of approaches to assessing corruption. One group is based on the perception of different experts about the prevalence of corruption in a country or a sector. The second group relies on actual acts of corruption and draws either on justice records (or other potential sources) regarding corruption convictions or on individuals’ experiences with corruption. The last group uses Public Expenditure Tracking Surveys and Quantitative Service Delivery Surveys to reveal potential corruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With a few exceptions (e.g., CPI , BEEPS , and WGI ), these ratings are produced by private risk-rating agencies and accessing them costs several thousand dollars (Mauro 1995).

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (1995). Reward Structures and the Allocation of Talent. European Economic Review, 39, 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, N. (2001). Corruption Perception Indices: A Comparative Analysis. Pakistan Development Review, 40(4), 813–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S., & Heywood, P. M. (2009). The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International’s Approach to Measuring Corruption. Political Studies, 57(4), 746–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, Ch., & Oman Ch. (2006). Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators. OECD Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Do People Mean What they Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data. American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, K., Bose, N., & Haque, M. E. (2006). The Incidence and Persistence of Corruption in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30(12), 2447–2467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadot, O. (1987). Corruption as a Gamble. Journal of Public Economics, 33(2), 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damania, R., Fredriksson, P. G., & Mani, M. (2004). The Persistence of Corruption and Regulatory Compliance Failures: Theory and Evidence. Public Choice, 121(3), 363–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilyan, D., & Ujhelyi, G. (2014). What Do Corruption Indices Measure? Economics and Politics, 26(2), 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzfeld, T., & Weiss, C. (2003). Corruption and Legal (In) Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 621–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzfeld, T., & Weiss, C. (2007). Corruption Clubs: Empirical Evidence from Kernel Density Estimates. Applied Economics, 39(12), 1565–1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. L., & Katz, E. (1987). Hierarchical Structure and the Social Costs of Bribes and Transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 34(2), 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A Review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G. (1999). The Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 1999: Framework Document. Berlin: Transparency International. www.Transparency.De.

  • Lui, F. T. (1986). A Dynamic Model of Corruption Deterrence. Journal of Public Economics, 31(2), 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malito, D. V. (2014). Measuring Corruption Indicators and Indices. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olken, B. A. (2009). Corruption Perceptions vs. Corruption Reality. Journal of Public Economics, 93(7), 950–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razafindrakoto, M., & Roubaud, F. (2010). Are International Databases on Corruption Reliable? A Comparison of Expert Opinion Surveys and Household Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 38(8), 1057–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seldadyo, H., & De Haan, J. (2011). Is Corruption Really Persistent? Pacific Economic Review, 16(2), 192–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, J. (2005). Eight Questions About Corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1996). A Theory of Collective Reputations (With Applications to the Persistence of Corruption and to Firm Quality). Review of Economic Studies, 63(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. C. (2007). How Much Do Perceptions of Corruption Really Tell Us? Economics Discussion Papers 2007–19. http://www.Economics-Ejournal.Org/Economics/Discussionpapers. Accessed 02 April 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid Sekkat .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sekkat, K. (2018). Measurement Issues. In: Is Corruption Curable?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98518-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98518-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98517-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98518-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics