Civil Society and the Specific Role of ICT

  • Khalid SekkatEmail author


The efficacy of information and the media as weapons against corruption having been documented, this chapter discusses the complementary role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Including ICT can be more effective in combating corruption than relying on traditional media alone. ICT enables citizens to access many government services online, which weakens the role of bureaucrats as intermediaries between the government and the public. Moreover, citizens can use the “social web” to communicate their opinions, suggest possible solutions, expose misbehaviour and promote ethical behaviour over long distances very quickly. Very importantly, ICT greatly facilitates investigation and asset tracking. Empirical findings reveal that ICT does indeed have a significant role in reducing corruption. Interestingly, e-government and internet penetration do a better job of explaining variations in corruption among countries than bureaucratic quality and law enforcement.


  1. Andersen, T. B. (2009). E-government as an Anti-Corruption Strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, T. B., Bentzen, J., Dalgaard, C. J., & Selaya, P. (2011). Does the Internet Reduce Corruption? Evidence from US States and Across Countries. World Bank Economic Review, 25(3), 387–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2010). Mobile Communication and Civic Life: Linking Patterns of Use to Civic and Political Engagement. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 536–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng, Y., Liang, J., & Leung, L. (2015). Social Network Service Use on Mobile Devices: An Examination of Gratifications, Civic Attitudes and Civic Engagement in China. New Media and Society, 17(7), 1096–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014). E-Government, Internet Adoption and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation. World Development, 57, 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goel, R. K., Nelson, M. A., & Naretta, M. A. (2012). The Internet as an Indicator of Corruption Awareness. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(1), 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An Institutional Analysis of an E-Government System for Anti-Corruption: The Case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four Stage Model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lio, M. C., Liu, M. C., & Ou, Y. P. (2011). Can the Internet Reduce Corruption? A Cross-Country Study Based on Dynamic Panel Data Models. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mistry, J. J., & Jalal, A. (2012). An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between E-Government and Corruption. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 12(18), 145–176.Google Scholar
  11. Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2009). Anticorruption Effects of Information Communication and Technology (ICT) and Social Capital. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. SPIDER (2010). Increasing Transparency and Fighting Corruption through ICT: Empowering People and Communities. SPIDER ICT4D Series No. 3.Google Scholar
  13. West, D. M. (2006). Global E-Government 2006, Brown University. http://www.Insidepolitics.Org/Egovt06int.Pdf. Accessed 02/04/2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre Emile BernheimUniversity of BrusselsBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations