Skip to main content

Africa

Successes and Failures of Water and Sanitation Governance Choices in Sub-Saharan Africa (1990–2017)

  • 316 Accesses

Part of the Palgrave Studies in Water Governance: Policy and Practice book series (PSWG)

Abstract

The chapter argues that, under current management and reform strategies, Sub-Saharan Africa is still lagging in coverage and unlikely to reach the universal water access and adequate sanitation targets promised by the Sustainable Development Goals set in 2016. It needs new reforms leading to faster, more cost-effective, and better-coordinated investment financing strategies. For now, financing constraints continue to be quite binding, local and international stakeholders continue to be slow at internalizing the lessons from mistaken reform and technology choices and implementation, and the impact of urbanization and development on the demand for service is underestimated. Current strategies are too slow and too unfocused to help fast enough the poorest who continue to be excluded from the benefits of improvements in the sector.

Keywords

  • Increasing Block Tariffs (IBTs)
  • Separate Regulatory Agencies
  • Public-private Partnerships (PPPs)
  • Estache
  • Danilenko

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98515-2_9
  • Chapter length: 35 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-98515-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 9.1
Fig. 9.2
Fig. 9.3
Fig. 9.4

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although policy discussion also includes a rebirth of old and recurring debates on the need to do better on irrigation to improve land productivity in the region, this chapter will not address the topic. See, for instance, Woodhouse et al. (2017).

  2. 2.

    Hutton and Varughese (2016).

  3. 3.

    Sambu (2016) and Ndikumana and Pickbourn (2017).

  4. 4.

    The latest comparable information dates from the Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic (AICD)—summarized in Foster and Briceno-Garmendia (2009). It is based on 2005–2007 data for most dimensions and this is by now largely out of date.

  5. 5.

    World Health Organization (2015), INVESTING IN WATER AND SANITATION: INCREASING ACCESS, REDUCING INEQUALITIES GLAAS 2014 findings—Special report for Africa.

  6. 6.

    Burkina Faso, Ghana, Lesotho, and Madagascar.

  7. 7.

    http://ppi.worldbank.org/snapshots/sector/water-and-sewerage.

  8. 8.

    Tukic and Burgess (2016).

  9. 9.

    Godfrey and Ross (2016).

  10. 10.

    https://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/africa/explore/nairobi-water-fund.xml.

  11. 11.

    Rimi Abubakar (2016) provides a powerful case study in Nigeria.

  12. 12.

    UNICEF (2015).

  13. 13.

    Many of these issues are often linked to poor implementation and poor coordination of otherwise-reasonable policy decisions. See World Bank (2017) for a series of detailed case studies, including some on SSA.

  14. 14.

    McKenzie et al. (2012).

  15. 15.

    UNEP (2010).

  16. 16.

    For a detailed discussion, see Wang et al. (2014).

  17. 17.

    Foster and Briceno-Garmendia (2009).

  18. 18.

    Based on data collected from the IBNET and GWI website, the two main sources of comparable information on tariffs for SSA.

  19. 19.

    In rural and/or non-networked water supply, users are often required to pay around 5–10% of capital costs. Often this can be paid in labor or local materials. For sanitation, users are mostly required to pay 100% of capital costs and O&M, and they usually cannot afford it.

  20. 20.

    See for multiple quantitative examples Angel-Urdinola and Wodon (2012), Banerjee et al. (2008), Bardasi and Wodon (2008), and Estache and Wodon (2014), and for powerful documentation of 17 cases studies, see Heymans et al. (2016).

  21. 21.

    Heymans et al. (2014).

  22. 22.

    Estache et al. (2006) and Auriol and Blanc (2009).

  23. 23.

    UNICEF (2015).

  24. 24.

    And it may be useful to remind the reader that water access and consumption are quite different matters. The average water consumption in Rwanda is 15 liters a day. In the USA, it is almost 40 times as much (575 liters per day) (see https://20liters.org/clean-water/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMImquFt7u-1QIVhj4bCh2gvgr1EAAYBCAAEgL1fvD_BwE).

  25. 25.

    Maziotis et al. (2013).

  26. 26.

    Guerriero (2011).

  27. 27.

    ESAWAS (2017).

  28. 28.

    Bertoméu-Sánchez et al. (2017).

  29. 29.

    Global Water Partnership/GWP (2015).

  30. 30.

    Oxfam (2016).

  31. 31.

    Jimenez-Redal et al. (2014).

  32. 32.

    Mansuri and Rao (2013).

  33. 33.

    Narayanan et al. (2017).

  34. 34.

    Herrera and Post (2014).

  35. 35.

    Jaglin et al. (2011).

  36. 36.

    Many of these contracts are actually quite small in terms of investment commitment, but they do represent a private sector presence at least in management of activities.

  37. 37.

    Note that the table does not report a number of deals which involved both water and electricity utilities. These include Cape Verde, Chad, Comoros, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Madagascar, Rwanda, and São Tomé. Most were management contracts.

  38. 38.

    Banerjee et al. (2008) provide the most systematic review of the regulatory context in the region. It is however a bit dated now, and unfortunately there is no recent dataset reporting comparable information.

  39. 39.

    Banerjee et al. (2008) argue that most of the contracts were indeed price caps.

  40. 40.

    For example, Water Services Regulatory Board (2016).

  41. 41.

    See Woodhouse and Muller (2017) for a recent overview.

  42. 42.

    See Almer et al. (2017) for recent evidence on water riots in SSA.

  43. 43.

    It is notable that there is no technical assessment of the impact of reforms on the accountability of the service providers in a region in which one of the major issues has been the political instrumentalization of public enterprises and the capture of politicians by private agents.

  44. 44.

    Note that they also show that this is quite different to what is observed in other regions. When everything else is held constant, the odds are about 17 times higher for a European or Central Asian country with a regulator and up to 43 times higher for a country in Latin America and the Caribbean.

  45. 45.

    It is remarkable that the narrative has made it to the NGOs’ message as well. See, for instance, Rusca and Schwartz (2012).

References

  • Almer, C., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., & Oechslin, M. (2017). Water Scarcity and Rioting: Disaggregated Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 86(C), 193–209.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Angel-Urdinola, D., & Wodon, Q. (2012). Does Increasing Access to Infrastructure Services Improve the Targeting Performance of Water Subsidies? Journal of International Development, 24(1), 88–101.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Auriol, E., & Blanc, A. (2008). Capture and Corruption in Public Utilities: The Cases of Water and Electricity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Utilities Policy, 17(2), 203–216.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Auriol, E., & Blanc, A. (2009). Capture and Corruption in Public Utilities: The Cases of Water and Electricity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Utilities Policy, 17(2), 203–216.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., & Morella, E. (2011). Africa’s Water and Sanitation Infrastructure: Access, Affordability, and Alternatives. Washington, DC: World Bank Directions in Development Series.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., Skilling, H., Foster, V., Briceño-Garmendia, C., Morella, E., & Chfadi, T. (2008). Ebbing Water, Surging Deficits: Urban Water Supply in Sub-Saharan Africa. AICD Background Paper 12. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/202131467990376308/pdf/482150ESW0P1111port0on0Water0Review.pdf.

  • Bardasi, E., & Wodon, Q. (2008). Who Pays the Most for Water? Alternative Providers and Service Costs in Niger. Economics Bulletin, 9(20), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, K. (2014). The Financialization of Water. Review of Radical Political Economics, 46(3), 292–307.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, K., & Fine, B. (2007). Privatization and Alternative Public Sector Reforms in Sub-Saharan Africa: Delivering on Electricity and Water. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoméu-Sánchez, S., Camos, D., & Estache, A. (2017). Do Private Water Utility Operators Care About Regulatory Agencies in Developing Countries? Policy Research Working Paper Series 8045, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccanfuso, D., Estache, A., & Savard, L. (2009). Water Price Reforms in Senegal: Distributional Impact Analysis. Journal of African Development, African Finance and Economic Association, 11(1), 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camos, D., & Estache, A. (2017). Regulating Water and Sanitation Network Services—Accounting for Institutional and Informational Constraints. In R. Damania (Ed.). Uncharted Waters: The Economics of Water Scarcity and Variability. OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESAWAS. (2017). Regional Benchmarking of Large WSS Utilities 2015/16, Lusaka, Zambia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estache, A., & Grifell-Tatjé, E. (2013). How (Un)even Was the Distribution of the Impacts of Mali’s Water Privatization Across Stakeholders? Journal of Development Studies, 49(4), 483–499.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Estache, A., & Wodon, Q. (2014). Infrastructure and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Estache, A., Laffont, J.-J., & Zhang, X. (2006). Universal Service Obligations in LDCs: The Effect of Uniform Pricing on Infrastructure Access. Journal of Public Economics, 90(6–7), 1155–1179.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, V., & Briceno-Garmendia, C. (Eds.). (2009). Africa’s Infrastructure: A Time for Transformation. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2009/01/11487313/africas-infrastructure-time-transformation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, E., & Francey, R. (2010). Regulating Water Services for All in Developing Economies. World Development, 38(9), 1229–1240.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Global Water Partnership. (2015). Integrated Water Resource Management in Eastern Africa: Coping with Complex Hydrology. Technical Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, S., & Ross, A. (2016). China and Africa: The New Water World. Waterline, 35(1), 12–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Guerriero, C. (2011). Legal Traditions and Economic Performances: Theory and Evidence. In B. Bouckaert & G. De Geest (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Vol. VII, 2nd ed., pp. 144–163). Ch. 9. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, J., Sy, A., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2015). Financing African Infrastructure: Can the World Deliver? Brookings, March. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/AGIFinancingAfricanInfrastructure_FinalWebv2.pdf.

  • Herrera, V., & Post, A. E. (2014). Can Developing Countries Both Decentralize and Depoliticize Urban Water Services? Evaluating the Legacy of the 1990s Reform Wave. World Development, 64, 621–641.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Heymans, C., Eales, K., & Franceys, R. (2014). The Limits and Possibilities of Prepaid Water in Urban Africa: Lessons from the Field. The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymans, C., Eberhard, R., Ehrhardt, D., & Riley, S. (2016). Providing Water to Poor People in African Cities Effectively: Lessons from Utility Reforms. Water and Sanitation Program, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopewell, M. R., & Graham, J. P. (2014). Trends in Access to Water Supply and Sanitation in 31 Major Sub-Saharan African Cities: An Analysis of DHS Data from 2000 to 2012. BMC Public Health. Retrieved from https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2458-14-208.

  • Hutton, G., & Varughese, M. (2016). The Costs of Meeting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal Targets on Drinking Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene. Technical Paper, Water and Sanitation Program (WSP), World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infrastructure Consortium for Africa. (2014). Infrastructure Financing Trends in Africa: ICA Report 2013. Tunis, Tunisia: ICA Secretariat, African Development Bank. Retrieved from http://www.icafrica.org/fileadmin/documents/Annual_Reports/ICA-2013-INFRA-FIN-TRENDS-AFRICA-2013-FINAL-WEB.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, M., Webster, M., & Vairavamoorthy, K. (Eds.). (2012). The Future of Water in African Cities: Why Waste Water? Directions in Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaglin, S., Repussard, C., & Belbéoch, A. (2011). Decentralisation and Governance of Drinking Water Services in Small West African Towns and Villages (Benin, Mali, Senegal): The Arduous Process of Building Local Governments. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement, 32(2), 119–138.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Redal, R., Parker, A., & Jeffrey, P. (2014). Factors Influencing the Uptake of Household Water Connections in Peri-Urban Maputo, Mozambique. Utilities Policy, 28, 22–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, C., Parker, D., & Zhang, Y.-F. (2006). An Empirical Analysis of State and Private-Sector Provision of Water Services in Africa. The World Bank Economic Review, 20(1), 143–163.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F. T., Wang, H. T., & Mafuta, C. (2011). Current Status and Technology Demands for Water Resources and Water Environment in Africa. In L. F. Ting (Ed.), Research on Water Resources of African Typical Areas. Beijing: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mande Bafua, P. (2015). Efficiency of Urban Water Supply in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do Organization and Regulation Matter? Utilities Policy, 37, 13–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing Development: Does Participation Work? Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marson, M., & Savin, I. (2015). Ensuring Sustainable Access to Drinking Water in Sub Saharan Africa: Conflict Between Financial and Social Objectives. World Development, 76, 26–39.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Maziotis, A., Calliari, E., & Mysiak, J. (2013). Robust Institutions for Sustainable Water Markets: A Survey of the Literature and the Way Forward. Venice: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, 58–2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbuvi, D., & Tarsim, A. (2011). Managerial Ownership and Urban Water Utilities Efficiency in Uganda. UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series, #2011-036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbuvi, D., De Witte, K., & Perelman, S. (2012). Urban Water Sector Performance in Africa: A Step-Wise Bias-Corrected Efficiency and Effectiveness Analysis. Utilities Policy, 22, 31–40.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R., Siqalaba, Z. N., & Wegelin, W. A. (2012). The State of Non-Revenue Water in South Africa. Report to the Water Research Commission by WRP Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd WRC, Report No. TT 522/12, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugisha, S. (2007). Effects of Incentive Applications on Technical Efficiencies: Empirical Evidence from Ugandan Water Utilities. Utilities Policy, 15, 225–233.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mwanza, D. (2010). Roles and Institutional Arrangements for Economic Regulation of Urban Water Services in Sub-Saharan Africa. Doctoral thesis. Loughborough University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, S., Thillai Rajan, A., Jebaraj, P., & Elayaraja, M. S. (2017). Delivering Basic Infrastructure Services to the Urban Poor: A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Bottom-Up Approaches. Utilities Policy, 44, 50–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ndikumana, L., & Pickbourn, L. (2017). The Impact of Foreign Aid Allocation on Access to Social Services in sub-Saharan Africa: The Case of Water and Sanitation. World Development, 90, 104–114.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam. (2016). Facilitation Active Civic Engagement: From Consultation to Participation: Learning from Local Communities Through Work with Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) in South Africa and Zambia. Retrieved from http://water.oxfam.org.uk/en/fair-access-en/facilitating-active-civic-engagement/.

  • Rimi Abubakar, I. (2016). Quality Dimensions of Public Water Services in Abuja, Nigeria. Utilities Policy, 38, 43–51.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rusca, M., & Schwartz, K. (2012). Divergent Sources of Legitimacy: A Case Study of International NGOs in the Water Services Sector in Lilongwe and Maputo. Journal of Southern African Studies, 38(3), 681–697.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sambu, D. (2016). Impact of Global Initiatives on Drinking Water Access in Africa. African Geographical Review, 35(2), 151–167.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2008). Performance Indicators of Water Losses in Distribution System. mimeo, UNESCO-IHE, Institute for Water Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taiwo, A. M. (2011). Composting as a Sustainable Waste Management Technique in Developing Countries. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 4, 93–102.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Taiwo, A. M., Olujimi, O. O., Bamgbose, O., & Arowolo, T. A. (2012). Surface Water Quality Monitoring in Nigeria: Situational Analysis and Future Management Strategy. In K. Voudoris (Eds.), Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment (pp. 301–322). Retrieved from www.intechopen.com/books/water-quality-monitoring-andassessment/surface-water-quality-monitoring-in-nigeria-situational-analysis-and-future-managementstrategy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thillairajan, A., Mahalingam, A., & Deep, A. (2016). Impact of Private-Sector Involvement on Access and Quality of Service in Electricity, Telecom, and Water Supply Sectors: A Systematic Review of the Evidence in Developing Countries. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukic, N., & Burgess, M. (2016). China’s Role in Africa’s Water Sector: Mapping the Terrain. Waterline, 35(1), 18–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2010). Africa Water Atlas. Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2015). Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: The Case for Support, December. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/publicpartnerships/files/WASHTheCaseForSupport.pdf.

  • van den Berg, C., & Danilenko, A. (2011). The IBNET Water Supply and Sanitation Performance Blue Book. Washington DC: World Bank, IBRD.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, C., & Danilenko, A. (2017). Performance of Water Utilities in Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Wang, T., Zhang, B., Li, F., Toure, B., Omosa, I. B., Chiramba, T., Abdel-Monem, M., & Pradhan, M. (2014). Water and Wastewater Treatment in Africa—Current Practices and Challenges. Clean Soil Air Water, 42, 1029–1035.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Water Services Regulatory Board. (2016). Impact: A Performance Review of Kenya’s Water Services Sector 20142015, Issue No. 9. Nairobi, Kenya. Retrieved from https://wasreb.go.ke/downloads/WASREB_Impact_Report9.pdf.

  • WHO. (2014). Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation Joint Monitoring Programme Update 2014. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/2014/jmp-report/en/.

  • Woodhouse, P., & Muller, M. (2017). Water Governance—An Historical Perspective on Current Debates. World Development, 92, 225–241.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, P., Veldwisch, G. J., Venot, J.-P., Brockington, D., Komakech, H., & Manjichi, A. (2017). African Farmer-Led Irrigation Development: Re-framing Agricultural Policy and Investment? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(1), 213–233.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group. (2017). Reducing Inequalities in Water Supply, Sanitation, and Hygiene in the Era of the Sustainable Development Goals: Synthesis Report of the Water Supply, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Poverty Diagnostic Initiative. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/27831.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2015). Investing in Water and Sanitation: Increasing Access, Reducing InequalitiesGLAAS 2014 FindingsSpecial Report for Africa. Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/glaas/glaas2014-africa-region.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Estache, A. (2019). Africa. In: Porcher, S., Saussier, S. (eds) Facing the Challenges of Water Governance. Palgrave Studies in Water Governance: Policy and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98515-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98515-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98514-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98515-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)