Skip to main content

Introduction

Facing the Challenges of Water Governance: Moving from the Public Versus Private Debate to Other (At Least) Equally Important Governance Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Facing the Challenges of Water Governance

Abstract

Good water management is essential to human development, people’s well-being, social inclusion, and environmental sustainability. The Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations set forward an ambitious agenda of providing universal access to good quality water supply and sanitation services within a financially constrained environment. However, the various peculiarities of each country regarding water governance makes it difficult to identify and implement the best practices and benchmarks. When it comes to water governance issues, the private versus public management question stays at the core of the public debate, for ideological reasons but also for practical ones; when there is a need for investments the temptation to look for private finance is natural. We argue that it pushes to the background other issues which are at least equally important, such as the proper scale to operate water services, stakeholders’ engagement, or the need for independent regulatory agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The data come from the water survey of the French Environment Institute (IFEN)/Observation and Statistics Department (SOeS). Five thousand French municipalities were surveyed in 1998, 2001, 2004, and 2008, which provided a representative panel of French water services. The survey was abandoned after 2008 and replaced with a French Observatory (Sispea) that was supposed to collect information from municipalities on every water service in France on a voluntary basis. The observatory exists, but despite multiple efforts to improve the situation, the data are far from representative and reliable.

  2. 2.

    The water utility performance index (WUPI) of the World Bank is a simple global index measuring how closely a utility company operates to accepted good practices. The index is based on ten dimensions generally accepted as key performance indicators in the industry and available from the IBNET dataset for most utility companies in the region. Those dimensions fall into three categories: coverage (water, sewer, and wastewater treatment); quality (service continuity and sewer blockage); and management (metering, NRW, staff productivity, collection rate, and operating cost recovery).

References

  • Akhmouch, A., Clavreul, D., & Glas, P. (2018). Introducing the OECD Principles on Water Governance. International Water, 43, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athias, L., & Saussier, S. (2007). Contractual Flexibility or Rigidity for Public Private Partnerships? Theory and Evidence from Infrastructure Concession Contracts. Revue Economique, 58(3), 565–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bel, G., González-Gómez, F., & Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. (2015). Does Market Concentration Affect Prices in the Urban Water Industry? Environment and Planning C, 33(6), 1546–1565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoméu, S., Camos, D., & Estache, A. (2018). Do Economic Regulatory Agencies Matter to Private-Sector Involvement in Water Utilities in Developing Countries. Utilities Policy, 50, 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beuve, J., de Brux, J., & Saussier, S. (2013). Renégocier pour durer : une analyse empirique des contrats de concessions. Revue d’économie industrielle, 141(1), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beuve, J., Moszoro, M., & Saussier, S. (2018). Political Contestability and Public Contract Rigidity. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, A., Harris, T. R., Narayanan, R., et al. (1995). Specification and Estimation of the Effect of Ownership on the Economic Efficiency of the Water Utilities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25(6), 759–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1996). A Theory of Privatization. The Economic Journal, 106, 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, E., Saussier, S., & Silverman, B. S. (2015). Water Under the Bridge: Determinants of Franchise Renewal in Water Provision. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 31(1), 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, G. R. G., Kosec, K., & Wallsten, S. (2009). Has Private Participation in Water and Sewerage Improved Coverage? Empirical Evidence from Latin America. Journal of International Development, 21(3), 327–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrieux, C., Eshien, C., & Saussier, S. (2013). Putting All One’s Eggs in One Basket: Relational Contracts and the Provision of Local Public Services. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 89, 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, E., Fischer, R., & Galetovic, A. (2011). Public-Private Partnerships to Revamp U.S. Infrastructure (pp. 1–26). The Hamilton Project—Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estache, A., & Kouassi, E. (2002). Sector Organization, Governance, and the Inefficiency of African Water Utilities. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2890. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Estache, A., & Rossi, M. (2002). How Different Is the Efficiency of Public and Private Water Companies in Asia? World Bank Economic Review, 16, 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estache, A., & Saussier, S. (2014). Public-Private Partnerships and Efficiency: A Short Assessment. CESifo DICE Report, 12(3), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estache, A. (2006). PPI Partnerships vs. PPI Divorces in LDCs. Review of Industrial Organization, 29(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galiani, S., Gertler, P., & Schargrodsky, E. (2005). Water for Life: The Impact of the Privatization of Water Services on Child Mortality. Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), 83–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2006). Efficiency Measurement in Spanish Local Government: The Case of Municipal Water Services. Review of Policy Research, 23(2), 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Valiñas, M. A., González Gómez, F., & Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. (2013). Is the Price of Water for Residential Use Related to Provider Ownership? Empirical Evidence from Spain. Utilities Policy, 24, 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch, J. L., Benitez, D., Portabales, I., & Flor, L. (2014). The Renegotiation of PPP Contracts: An Overview of Its Recent Evolution in Latin America. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2014/18, OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasch, J.-L. (2004). Granting and Renegotiating Infrastructure Concession: Doing It Right. Mimeo: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, C., Parker, D., & Zhang, Y.-F. (2006). State Versus Private Sector Provision of Water Services in Africa: An Empirical Analysis. The World Bank Economic Review, 20(1), 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. (1978). Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process. The Journal of Law and Economics, 21(2), 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J. (2000). Etapes vers un Etat moderne : une analyse économique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. (2011). Privatization, Water Access and Affordability: Evidence from Malaysian Household Expenditure Data. Economic Modelling, 28(5), 2121–2128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T. P., Montgomery, A. W., & Zhao, D. (2018). A Change Would Do You Good: Privatization, Municipalization and Drinking Water Quality. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, R., & De Witte, K. (2011). Is Big Better? On Scale and Scope Economies in the Portuguese Water Sector. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 1009–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Espiñeira, R., García-Valiñas, M. A., & González-Gómez, F. (2009). Does Private Management of Water Supply Services Really Increase Prices? An Empirical Analysis in Spain. Urban Studies, 46(4), 923–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani, F., & Urakami, T. (2001). Identifying Network Density and Scale Economies for Japanese Water Supply Organizations. Papers in Regional Science, 80(2), 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moszoro, M. W., & Spiller, P. T. (2012). Third-Party Opportunism and the Nature of Public Contracts. NBER w18636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moszoro, M. W., Spiller, P. T., & Stolorz, S. (2016). Rigidity of Public Contracts. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(3), 396–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office. (2001). Managing the Relationship to Secure a Successful Partnership in PFI Contracts. Report by the Controller and Auditor General.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauges, C., & Whittington, D. (2017). Evaluating the Performance of Alternative Municipal Water Tariff Designs: Quantifying the Tradeoffs Between Equity, Economic Efficiency, and Cost Recovery. World Development, 91, 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). Strategic Transport Infrastructure Needs to 2030. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264114425-en.

  • OECD. (2015a). Principles on Water Governance. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/governance/regional-policy/OECD-Principles-on-Water-Governance.pdf.

  • OECD. (2015b). Stakeholder’s Engagement for Inclusive Water Governance. Retrieved from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/stakeholder-engagement-for-inclusive-water-governance_9789264231122-en.

  • Porcher, S. (2014). Efficiency and Equity in Two-Part Tariffs: The Case of Residential Water Rates. Applied Economics, 46(5), 539–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porcher, S. (2017). The ‘Hidden Costs’ of Water Provision: New Evidence from the Relationship Between Contracting-Out and Price in French Water Public Services. Utilities Policy, 48, 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruester, S., & Zschille, M. (2010). The Impact of Governance Structure on Firm Performance: An Application to the German Water Distribution Sector. Utilities Policy, 18(3), 154–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saal, D. S., & Parker, D. (2000). The Impact of Privatization and Regulation on the Water and Sewerage Industry in England and Wales: A Translog Cost Function Model. Managerial and Decision Economics, 21(6), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saussier, S., & de Brux, J. (2018). The Economics of Public-Private Partnerships. Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, J.-S., Harrington, W., Pizer, W. A., & Gillingham, K. (2004). Economies of Scale and Technical Efficiency in Community Water Systems. Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 04-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets, H. (2004). La solidarité de l’eau potable: aspects économiques. Paris: Report, Académie de l’eau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Strahan and Cadell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, P. T. (2008). An Institutional Theory of Public Contracts: Regulatory Implications. NBER Working Paper (14152).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiel, C. (2017, December). Modern Public Enterprises: Organisational Innovation and Productivity. Working Paper 1713, DIW Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, D., Nauges, C., Fuente, D., & Wu, X. (2015). A Diagnostic Tool for Estimating the Incidence of Subsidies Delivered by Water Utilities in Low-and Medium-Income Countries, with Illustrative Simulations. Utilities Policy, 34, 70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphane Saussier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Porcher, S., Saussier, S. (2019). Introduction. In: Porcher, S., Saussier, S. (eds) Facing the Challenges of Water Governance. Palgrave Studies in Water Governance: Policy and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98515-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98515-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98514-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98515-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics