Skip to main content

Further Advancing Service Science with Service-Dominant Logic: Service Ecosystems, Institutions, and Their Implications for Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Service Science, Volume II

Abstract

Service-dominant (S-D) logic has been recognized as a theoretical foundation for developing a science of service. As the field of service science advances the understanding of value cocreation in service systems, S-D logic continues to evolve as well. Recent updates and consolidation of the foundational premises establish five core axioms of S-D logic and outline a pathway for understanding the role of institutions in value cocreation in general, and innovation in particular. This chapter overviews the evolution of S-D logic and its service ecosystems view, which can contribute to the furthering the development of service science and advancing the study of innovation in service systems. Future research directions are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaka, Melissa Archpru, and Jennifer D. Chandler (2011). “Roles as resources: A social roles perspective of change in value networks.” Marketing Theory 11(3), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaka, Melissa Archpru, and Stephen L. Vargo (2014). “Technology as an operant resource in service (eco) systems.” Information Systems and e-Business Management 12(3), 367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., & Polese, F. (2010). Linking the viable system and many-to-many network approaches to service-dominant logic and service science. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality - A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011). Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory, 11(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gregori, T. R. (1987). Resources are not; they become: An institutional theory. Journal of Economic Issues, 21(3), 1241–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J. (2006). How emergence arises. Ecological Complexity, 3(4), 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. j., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, I. (2003). The idea of emergent property. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(3), 239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, LA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. A., & Lewis, P. (2012). New perspectives on emergence in economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82(2–3), 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, J., Tellis, G. J., & Griffin, A. (2006). Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing science, 25(6), 687–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskela-Huotari, K. (2018). The evolution of markets - A service ecosystems perspective. (PhD dissertation), Karlstad University, Karlstad University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela-Huotari, K., Edvardsson, B., Jonas, J. M., Sörhammar, D., & Witell, L. (2016). Innovation in service ecosystems—Breaking, making, and maintaining institutionalized rules of resource integration. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2964–2971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskela-Huotari, K., & Vargo, S. L. (2016). Institutions as resource context. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26(2), 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of management journal, 45(1), 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 215–254). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, C. H. (1983). Classifying services to gain strategic marketing insights. The Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P., Kieliszewski, C. A., & Spohrer, J. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of Service Science. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2013). A service science perspective on business model innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 665–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P., Vargo, S. L., Caswell, N., & Spohrer, J. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(4), 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (2002). The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, I., Badinelli, R., Polese, F., Di Nauta, P., Löbler, H., & Halliday, S. (2012). S-D logic research directions and opportunities: The perspective of systems, complexity and engineering. Marketing Theory, 12(2), 213–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, I., Maull, R., & Smith, L. (2011). Embedding the new discipline of service science. In H. Demirkan, J. Spohrer, & V. Krishna (Eds.), The science of service systems (pp. 13–35). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York, NY: Cambridge university press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor (2010). “Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems.” American economic review 100(3), 641–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959/2011). The theory of the growth of the firm (F. edition Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siltaloppi, J., Koskela-Huotari, K., & Vargo, S. L. (2016). Institutional Complexity as a Driver for Innovation in Service Ecosystems. Service Science, 8(3), 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (Vol. 3). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2010). Toward a science of service systems. In P. P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski, & J. C. Spohrer (Eds.), Handbook of service science (pp. 157–194). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40(1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., Viale, T., & Gendron, Y. (2016). Reflexivity: The role of embedded social position and entrepreneurial social skill in processes of field level change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: Wiley Online Library.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L. (2008). Customer integration and value creation: Paradigmatic Traps and Perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 11(2), 211–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2009). Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: clarifications. Service Science, 1(1), 32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2012). Value Cocreation and Service Systems (Re)Formation: A Service Ecosystems View. Service Science, 4(3), 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Akaka, M. A., & Vaughan, C. M. (2017). Conceptualizing Value: A Service-ecosystem View. Journal of Creating Value, 3(2), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F., & Akaka, M. A. (2010). Advancing Service Science service science with Service-Dominant Logic service-dominant logic. In P. P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski, & J. C. Spohrer (Eds.), Handbook of service science (pp. 133–156). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1911). An introduction to mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, H., Hartmann, N. N., & Vargo, S. L. (2017). Business models as service strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, H., Koskela-Huotari, K., & Vargo, S. L. (2016). Extending actor participation in value creation: an institutional view. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3–4), 210–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, H., Polese, F., Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2012). Toward a Service (Eco)Systems Perspective on Value Creation. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 3(3), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilden, R., Akaka, M. A., Karpen, I. O., & Hohberger, J. (2017). The Evolution and Prospects of Service-Dominant Logic: An Investigation of Past, Present, and Future Research. Journal of Service Research, 20(4), 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and strategies in services marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 49(2), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zietsma, C., & McKnight, B. (2009). Building the iron cage: institutional creation work in the context of competing protoinstitutions. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 143–177). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa Archpru Akaka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Akaka, M.A., Koskela-Huotari, K., Vargo, S.L. (2019). Further Advancing Service Science with Service-Dominant Logic: Service Ecosystems, Institutions, and Their Implications for Innovation. In: Maglio, P.P., Kieliszewski, C.A., Spohrer, J.C., Lyons, K., Patrício, L., Sawatani, Y. (eds) Handbook of Service Science, Volume II. Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98512-1_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics