Skip to main content

Intersectionality and Indigenous Peoples in Australia: Experiences with Engagement in Native Title and Mining

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy

Abstract

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia are culturally diverse, with varied experiences of colonisation. However, policy and planning processes often treat Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples as a homogenised bloc, erasing differences of opinion, values, politics, and experiences and avoiding analysis of internal power dynamics. There is also a tendency for non-Indigenous policymakers to conflate ‘Indigenous’ with ‘environmental’ interests and values. Thus, despite often good intentions, consultation and engagement processes with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples generally fail to adopt an intersectional approach and in turn not only often fail in their stated goal of inclusivity but may exacerbate existing conflicts within a particular group and unintentionally reproduce inequities. In this chapter, the authors outline an understanding of intersectionality as informed by Aboriginal women and bring together insights from two Australian case studies to explore some of the problems that emerge from a failure to adopt an intersectional lens when engaging with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. They consider multiple and co-constituting axes of power with a focus on the relationships between colonisation, kyriarchy, and the lived experiences of Indigenous Peoples and outline considerations for operationalising intersectionality, particularly in the context of Native Title.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Kyriarchy’ is a term describing co-constituting and ‘interlocking structures of domination’ (Schüssler Fiorenza 1992, p. 8) and can be thought of as the structure intersectionality produces and which produces intersectionality (Osborne 2015).

  2. 2.

    We do not seek to promote the deficit discourse ‘that consistently frames Aboriginal identity in a narrative of deficiency’ (see Fforde et al. 2013, p. 162), rather we seek to highlight what is inequitable and unjust and to highlight the ongoing impacts of colonisation on the material conditions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders.

  3. 3.

    Kath Walker/Oodgeroo Noonuccal was a political activist, poet, and campaigner for Aboriginal rights. She was one of the most nationally prominent members of the Quandamooka People and a key figure in the campaign for the reform of the Australian Constitution to allow Aboriginal People full citizenship.

  4. 4.

    A number of recent books (see Jackson et al. 2017; Porter 2016; Porter and Barry 2016) present are an exciting and important advance in beginning to addressing this lacuna in planning discourse and scholarship.

  5. 5.

    ‘Makarrata’ is a Yolngu word ‘describing a process of conflict resolution, peacemaking and justice’ (Pearson 2017). The term is offered as an alternative to ‘treaty’, though Pearson notes the terms are not precisely equivalent, and the translation flattens out some of the complexity in the Yolngu term.

References

  • Altman, J. (2012). Indigenous Rights, Mining Corporations, and the Australian State. In S. Sawyer & E. T. Gomez (Eds.), The Politics of Resource Extraction: Indigenous Peoples, Multinational Corporations, and the State (pp. 46–74). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/97802303687.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bains, R. (2013). Opportunities for First Nations Prosperity Through Oil and Gas Development. Vancouver, BC: Centre for Aboriginal Policy Studies, Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrendt, L. (1993). Aboriginal Women and the White Lies of the Feminist Movement: Implications for Aboriginal Women in Rights Discourse. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 1(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.1993.11077108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buczko, M. (2016). Six Things You Need to Know About Intersectionality. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://mcwh.com.au/mcwh-news/?p=1082.

  • Burnside, S. (2012). Outcomes for All? Overlapping Claims and Intra Indigenous Conflict Under the Native Title Act. Australian Indigenous Law Review, 16(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, J., & Grant-Smith, D. (2005). Building Citizens: Participatory Planning Practice and a Transformative Politics of Difference. Urban Policy and Research, 23(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. (2010). Protocols, Particularities, and Problematising Indigenous ‘Engagement’ in Community-Based Environmental Management in Settled Australia. The Geographical Journal, 176(3), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00355.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, N. (2012). Perseverance, Determination, and Resistance: An Indigenous Intersectional-Based Policy Analysis of Violence in the Lives of Indigenous Girls. In O. Hankivsky (Ed.), An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework (pp. 133–158). Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conifer, D. (2017, February 13). Native Title: Federal Government Moves to Change Act After Court Ruling. ABC News (online). Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-13/government-moves-to-change-native-title-act/8266108.

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delegates at the Referendum Convention at Uluru. (2017). The Uluru Statement from the Heart. 1 Voice Uluru (online). Retrieved from https://www.1voiceuluru.org/the-statement/.

  • Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. (2016). Closing the Gap: Prime Minister’s Report 2016. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fforde, C., Bamblett, L., Lovett, R., Gorringe, S., & Fogarty, B. (2013). Discourse, Deficit and Identity: Aboriginality, the Race Paradigm and the Language of Representation in Contemporary Australia. Media International Australia, 149, 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, R., & Iveson, K. (2008). Planning and Diversity in the City: Redistribution, Recognition and Encounter. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, T. (2005). Preface. In B. Hocking (Ed.), Unfinished Constitutional Business? Rethinking Indigenous Self-determination (pp. vii–vix). Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. (2017). Indigenous Recognition: Turnbull Government’s Rejection of Uluru Statement from the Heart Indefensible. ABC News (online). Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-27/decision-to-reject-uluru-statement-is-indefensible/9093408.

  • Government of Australia. (1983). Native Title Act. Office of Legislative Drafting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O. (Ed.). (2012). An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework. Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (2013). Emergent Indigenous Identities: Rejecting the Need for Purity. In M. Harris, M. Nakata, & B. Carlson (Eds.), The Politics of Identity: Emerging Indigeneity (pp. 10–26). Sydney, Australia: UTS e-Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, S. D. (2015). ‘They Say I’m Not a Typical Blackfella’: Experiences of Racism and Ontological Insecurity in Urban Australia. Journal of Sociology, 52(4), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783315581218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howden, S. (2012, December 8). Plan to Explore for Gas Under 40% of the State. The Sydney Morning Herald, 1. https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/plan-to-explore-for-gas-under-40-percent-of-state-20121207-2b11e.html.

  • Howitt, R., & McLean, J. (2015). Towards Closure? Coexistence, Remoteness and Righteousness in Indigenous Policy in Australia. Australian Geographer, 46(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2015.1020992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, C., & Shaw, L. (2017). The Friction of Fracking: Discursive Constraints on Aboriginal Participation in Coal Seam Gas in Northern NSW. The Extractive Industries & Society, 4(2), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.01.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igoe, J. (2008). Global Indigenism and Spaceship Earth: Convergence, Space, and Re-entry Friction. In J. Oostoek & B. K. Gills (Eds.), The Globalization of Environmental Crisis (pp. 95–108). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irazábal, C., & Huerta, C. (2016). Intersectionality and Planning at the Margins: LGBTQ Youth of Color in New York. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(5), 714–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2015.1058755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., Porter, L., & Johnson, L. C. (2017). Planning in Indigenous Australia: From Imperial Foundations to Postcolonial Futures. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langton, M. (2015). Maximising the Potential for Empowerment: The Sustainability of Indigenous Native Title Corporations. In S. Brennan, M. Davis, B. Edgeworth, & L. Terrill (Eds.), Native Title from Mabo to Akiba: A Vehicle for Change and Empowerment? (pp. 171–183). Leichhardt: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, C. (2014). Intersectionality and Indigenous Feminism: An Aboriginal Woman’s Perspective. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://postcolonialist.com/civil-discourse/intersectionality-indigenous-feminism-aboriginal-womans-perspective/.

  • Lucashenko, M., & Best, O. (1995). Women Bashing: An Urban Aboriginal Perspective. Social Alternatives, 14(1), 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, G. (1997). ‘Recognition and Justice’: The Traditional/Historical Contradiction in New South Wales. In D. E. Smith & J. Finlayson (Eds.), Fighting Over Country: Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 65–82). Canberra, ACT: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, G. (2006). Adversarial Law and Native Title: How Legal Models Reconstitute Persons and Socialities. Dissent, 21, 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, G., & Bauman, T. (2011). Concepts, Hegemony, and Analysis: Unsettling Native Title Anthropology. In T. Bauman & G. Macdonald (Eds.), Unsettling Anthropology: The Demands of Native Title on Worn Concepts and Changing Lives (pp. 1–18). Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, E. (2008). Intersectional Race and Gender Analyses: Why Legal Processes Just Don’t Get It. Social and Legal Studies, 17(2), 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marland, S. (2012). The Need for Homelands: Living on Traditional, Ancestral Lands Is Critical for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Australian Quarterly, 83(3), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. F. (2015). Does Native Title Merely Provide an Entitlement to Be Native? Indigenes, Identities, and Applied Anthropological Practice. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 26(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuire, A. (2018). Mainstream Feminism Still Blind to Its Racism. IndigenousX (online). Retrieved from https://indigenousx.com.au/amy-mcquire-mainstream-feminism-still-blind-to-its-racism/#.WvqnuoiFPIU.

  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2000). Talkin’ Up to the White Woman: Aboriginal Women and Feminism. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2013). Towards an Australian Indigenous Women’s Standpoint Theory. Australian Feminist Studies, 28(78), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2013.876664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir, K. (2012). Politics, Protest and Performativity: The Broome Community’s ‘No Gas on the Kimberley Coast’ Campaign. Australian Humanities Review, 53, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundine, W. (2011, September 9). Inquiry into Coal Seam Gas, NTSCORP Limited (Submission No. 0334). Retrieved from https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/committee.nsf/0/8cd836184a4a4f8cca25790d00259caf/$FILE/Submission%200334.pdf.

  • National Native Title Tribunal. (2011). Quandamooka People’s Native Title Determinations. Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, H. R. (2015). ‘What Do We Want?’: A Political History of Aboriginal Land Rights in New South Wales. Canberra, ACT: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Kane, M. (2013). Initial Report on the Independent Review of Coal Seam Gas Activities in NSW. Sydney: NSW Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, N. (2014). Stories of Stradbroke: Emotional Geographies of an Island in Transition. (Doctor of Philosophy), Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, N. (2015). Intersectionality and Kyriarchy: A Framework for Approaching Power and Social Justice in Planning and Climate Change Adaptation. Planning Theory, 14(2), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213516443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, L. (2017). What Is a Makarrata? The Yolngu Word Is More Than a Synonym for Treaty. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-10/makarrata-explainer-yolngu-word-more-than-synonym-for-treaty/8790452.

  • Porter, L. (2014). Possessory Politics and the Conceit of Procedure: Exposing the Cost of Rights Under Conditions of dispossession. Planning Theory, 13(4), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214524569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. (2016). Unlearning the Colonial Cultures of Planning. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L., & Barry, J. (2016). Planning for Coexistence? Recognizing Indigenous Rights Through Land-Use Planning in Canada and Australia. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Procter, A. (2016). Uranium and the Boundaries of Indigeneity in Nunatsiavut, Labrador. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(2), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, J. (2015). Geopolitics of Aboriginal Sovereignty: Colonial Law as ‘A Species of Excess of Its Own Authority’, Aboriginal Passport Ceremonies and Asylum Seekers. Law Text Culture, 19, 84–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, D. (2009). Contesting Native Title. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (1992). But She Said: Feminist Practices of Biblical Interpretation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, L. (2014). Governance of Aboriginal Access to Land: Native Title and Land Rights in New South Wales. A Case Study of Coal Seam Gas Development in Northern NSW (Honours thesis). Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldatic, K. (2015). Postcolonial Reproductions: Disability, Indigeneity and the Formation of the White Masculine Settler State of Australia. Social Identities, 21(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2014.995352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strelien, L. (2015). The Right to Resources and the Right to Trade. In S. Brennan, M. Davis, B. Edgeworth, & L. Terrill (Eds.), Native Title from Mabo to Akiba: A Vehicle for Change and Empowerment? (pp. 44–59). Leichhardt: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, R., & Hamlyn, C. (2017, February 2). Noongar Native Title Agreement: $1.3b Deal Rejected by Federal Court. ABC News (online). Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-02/billon-dollar-noongar-native-title-deal-rejected-by-court/8235138.

  • Trigger, D., Keenan, J., de Rijke, K., & Rifkin, W. (2014). Aboriginal Engagement and Agreement-Making with a Rapidly Developing Resource Industry: Coal Seam Gas Development in Australia. The Extractive Industries and Society, 1(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2014.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, E., & Neale, T. (2016). Unstable Relations: Indigenous People and Environmentalism in Contemporary Australia. Crawley: University of Western Australia Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. (2015). The Legal Shortcomings of Native Title. In S. Brennan, M. Davis, B. Edgeworth, & L. Terrill (Eds.), Native Title from Mabo to Akiba: A Vehicle for Change and Empowerment? (pp. 14–22). Leichhardt: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, I. (1998). Power of the Muldarbi: The Road to Its Demise. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 11(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.1998.11077280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler-Jones, C., Howlett, C., Seini, M., & Burns, G. L. (2015). Media Constructions of Aboriginality: Implications for Engagement with Coal Seam Gas Development in Australia. Australian Geographer, 46(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2015.1020599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie Osborne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Osborne, N., Howlett, C., Grant-Smith, D. (2019). Intersectionality and Indigenous Peoples in Australia: Experiences with Engagement in Native Title and Mining. In: Hankivsky, O., Jordan-Zachery, J.S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy. The Politics of Intersectionality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98473-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics