On the Economic Impact of Innovation and Technological Transformation for People with Mobility Limitations

  • Nur M. OnvuralEmail author


Recently, there have been numerous innovations and advancements in technology to improve the health of people with mobility limitations. These changes are expected to enhance their living standards leading to potential employment opportunities and to improve the overall economics for them, their supporters, and their communities. To address those changes, we looked into assistive technologies and the surrounding technical improvements around those devices to address their economic impacts. The advances include the progress with information and communication technologies, brain-controlled interactions, and connectivity of all these devices or the Internet of Things to provide solutions for these populations to improve their abilities for better employment opportunities to create more value in the economy. Although there are many promising devices, communication tools, interconnections, and networks to allow the disabled to enhance their livelihood, yet there are also many barriers and challenges to consider to achieve economic benefits to the full extent.



Assistive technology


Assistive product


brain computer interfaces


Department of International Development


Gross domestic product


Information and communication technology


Internet of Things


International Standard Organization


Organization of Economic Development


World Health Organization


  1. Asian Development Bank. (2005). Disability brief: Identifying and addressing the needs of disabled people. © Asian Development Bank. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
  2. Broadband Commission for Digital Development, G3ict, IDA, ITU, Microsoft, The Foundation, and UNESCO. (2013). The ICT opportunity for a disability-inclusive development framework.
  3. Burkhauser, R. V., & Daly, M. C. (2011). The declining work and welfare of people with disabilities: What went wrong and a strategy for change. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carter, K., Lewis, R., & Ward, T. (2016). Improving care delivery to individuals with special or supportive care needs. McKinsey & Company. Detroit, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, M., Campo, E., Estève, D., & Fourniols, J. Y. (2009). Smart homes – Current features and future perspectives. Maturitas, 64(2), 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheatham, L. P. (2012). Effects of Internet use on well-being among adults with physical disabilities: A review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 7(3), 181–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutler, D. M. (2001). The reduction in disability among the elderly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(12), 6546–6547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DFID (Department for International Development). (2000, February). Poverty, disability and development, p. 4.Google Scholar
  9. Disability and Development. Global situation for people with disabilities. Retrieved from
  10. Domingo, M. C. (2012). An overview of the Internet of Things for people with disabilities. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(2), 584–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eid, N. (2015, November 29). Accessibility and future of Internet of Things. Blog Post. Retrieved from
  12. Etherington, D., & Ingold, J. (2012). Welfare to work and the inclusive labour market: A comparative study of activation policies for disability and long-term sickness benefit claimants in the UK and Denmark. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grider, J., & Wydick, B. (2016). Wheels of fortune: The economic impacts of wheelchair provision in Ethiopia. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 8(1), 44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grübler, G., & Hildt, E. (Eds.). (2014). Brain-computer interfaces in their ethical, social and cultural contexts. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, 12., © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  15. Hussein, A., Adda, M., Atieh, M., & Fahs, W. (2014). Smart home design for disabled people based on neural networks. The 5th international conference on emerging ubiquitous systems and pervasive networks (EUSP N-2014). Procedia Computer Science, 37, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krahn, G. L., Walker, D. K., & Correa-De-Araujo, R. (2015). Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. American Journal of Public Health, 105(S2), S198–S206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kraus, L. (2017). 2016 disability statistics annual report. Durham: University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leeb, R., Perdikis, S., Tonin, L., Biasiucci, A., Tavella, M., Creatura, M., Molina, A., Al-Khodairy, A., Carison, T., & Millán, J. D. (2013). Transferring brain-controlled computer interface beyond the laboratory: Successful application control for motor-disabled users. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 59(2), 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li, W., & Sellers, C. (2009). Improving assistive technology economics for people with disabilities: Harnessing the voluntary and education sectors. Science and technology for humanity (TIC-STH), 2009 IEEE Toronto international conference, pp. 789–794. © Copyright 2010 IEEE.Google Scholar
  21. Macdonald, S. J., & Clayton, J. (2013). Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disability & Society, 28(5), 702–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manzoor, M., & Vimarlund, V. (2017). E-services for the social inclusion of people with disabilities: A literature review. Technology and Disability, 29(1–2), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Metts, R. (2004). Disability and development, background paper for the World Bank, Banque Mondiale, p. 32.
  24. Millán, J. d. R., Rupp, R., Müller-Putz, G. R., Murray-Smith, R., Giugliemma, C., Tangermann, M., et al. (2010). Combining brain–computer interfaces and assistive technologies: State-of-the-art and challenges. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4, 161. Scholar
  25. Mizunoya, S., & Mitra, S. (2012, May). Is there a disability gap in employment rates in developing countries? Social Science Research Network.
  26. Nam, S.-J., & Park, E.-Y. (2017). The effects of the smart environment on the information divide experienced by people with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 10(2), 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). The promise of assistive technology to enhance activity and work participation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Scholar
  28. OECD. (2001). Understanding the digital divide. OECD.Google Scholar
  29. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2010). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Retrieved from
  30. Raja, D. S. (2016). Bridging the disability divide through digital technologies. Background paper for the World Development report.Google Scholar
  31. Raja, S., Imaizumi, S., Kelly, T., Narimatsu, J., & Paradi-Guilford, C. (2013). How information and communication technologies could help expand employment opportunities. Washington, DC: World Bank Scholar
  32. Reis, C. I., & Maximiano, M. d. S. (2016). Internet of Things and advanced application in healthcare. IGI GlobalGoogle Scholar
  33. Rupp, R., Kleih, S. C., Leeb, R., Millan, J. d. R., Kübler, A., & Müller-Putz, G. R. (n.d.) Brain–computer interfaces and assistive technology.Google Scholar
  34. Rupp R., Kleih S.C., Leeb R., del R. Millan J., Kübler A., Müller-Putz G.R. (2014) Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technology. In: Grübler G., Hildt E. (eds) Brain-Computer-Interfaces in their ethical, social and cultural contexts. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  35. The ICT Opportunity for a Disability_Inclusive Development. (2013, September). Retrieved from the ICT opportunity for a disability-inclusive development … – ITU.Google Scholar
  36. White Paper. (2015, July). Internet of Things: New promises for persons with disabilities a G3ict business case white paper series researched in cooperation with AT&T.Google Scholar
  37. WHO Report. (2011). World report on disability. Retrieved from
  38. Wolpaw, J. R. (2013). Chapter 6 – Brain-computer interfaces. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 110, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002). Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(6), 767–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. World Bank. (2013). Improving accessibility to transport for People with Limited Mobility (PLM): A practical guidance note. Washington, DC: World Bank Group Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pfeiffer UniversityMorrisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations