Skip to main content

Semantic Interoperability of Multilingual Language Resources by Automatic Mapping

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 11032)

Abstract

The PMKI project is an European Commission action aiming to create a public multilingual knowledge management infrastructure to support e-commerce solutions in a multilingual environment. Such infrastructure will consist in a set of tools able to create interoperability between multilingual classification systems (like thesauri) and other language resources, so that they can be easily accessible through a Web dissemination platform and reusable by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), as well as by public administrations. In this paper the standards used to represent language resources and a methodology for automatic mapping between thesauri, based on an information retrieval framework, are presented.

Keywords

  • Semantic interoperability
  • Language resources
  • Information retrieval
  • Semantic mapping
  • Ontolex-Lemon

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_12
  • Chapter length: 11 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-98349-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Notes

  1. 1.

    ISA2: Interoperability solutions for public administrations, businesses and citizens (https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/home_en).

  2. 2.

    https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/automated-translation.

  3. 3.

    ELRC: the European Language Resource Coordination action launched by the European Commission as part of the CEF.AT platform activities, to identify and gather language data across all 30 European countries participating in the CEF programme. More information can be found here: http://www.lr-coordination.eu/.

  4. 4.

    Ontology-Lexica Community Group: https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/.

  5. 5.

    Lexicon Model for Ontologies: Community Report, 10 May 2016: https://www.w3.org/2016/05/ontolex/ (last consulted: 03/04/2018).

  6. 6.

    for example Parliament is a simple term, President of the Republic is a complex term.

  7. 7.

    Linguistic expressions by single or multi words.

  8. 8.

    Statistics on terms to obtain weighted entries are not possible since document collections are not available (schema-based thesaurus mapping).

  9. 9.

    https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/current/stemming.html.

  10. 10.

    http://ec.europa.eu/eclas/.

  11. 11.

    http://zbw.eu/stw/.

References

  1. Pazienza, M.T., Stellato, A., Turbati, A.: Linguistic watermark 3.0: an RDF framework and a software library for bridging language and ontologies in the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP 2008), Rome, Italy (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oltramari, A., Stellato, A.: Enriching ontologies with linguistic content: an evaluation framework. In: Proceedings of OntoLex 2008, Marrakech, Morocco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cimiano, P., Haase, P., Herold, M., et al.: LexOnto: a model for ontology lexicons for ontology-based NLP. In: Proceedings of the OntoLex 2007 Workshop (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buitelaar, P., Declerck, T., Frank, A., et al.: LingInfo: design and applications of a model for the integration of linguistic information in ontologies. In: Proceedings of OntoLex 2006, Genoa, Italy (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Montiel-Ponsoda, E., Aguado De Cea, G., Gómez-Pérez, A., et al.: Enriching ontologies with multilingual information. Nat. Lang. Eng. XVII(3), 283–309 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Cimiano, P., Buitelaar, P., McCrae, J., et al.: LexInfo: a declarative model for the lexicon-ontology interface. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web IX(1), 29–51 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. McCrae, J., Aguado-De-Cea, G., Buitelaar, P., et al.: Interchanging lexical resources on the semantic web. Lang. Resour. Eval. XLVI(4), 701–719 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. McCrae, J., Bosque-Gil, J., Gracia, J., et al.: The Ontolex-Lemon model: development and applications. In: Proceedings of eLex 2017 conference, pp. 19–21 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J.A., Lassila, O.: The semantic web: a new form of web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Sci. Am. CCLXXXIV(5), 34–43 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Cimiano, P., Unger, C., McCrae, J.: Ontology-based interpretation of natural language. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. VII(2), 1–178 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chiarcos, C., Nordhoff, S., Hellmann, S. (eds.): Linked Data in Linguistics. Spinger, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28249-2

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Borin, L., Dannells, D., Forsberg, M., et al.: Representing Swedish lexical resources in RDF with lemon. In: Proceedings of the ISWC 2014 Posters & Demonstrations Track, Riva del Garda, Italy, pp. 329–332 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Navigli, R., Ponzetto, S.: BabelNet: the automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network. Artif. Intell. CXCIII, 217–250 (2012)

    MathSciNet  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Eckle-Kohler, J., Mccrae, J., Chiarcos, C.: Lemonuby-a large, interlinked, syntactically-rich lexical resource for ontologies. Semant. Web VI(4), 371–378 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Buitelaar, P.: Ontology-based semantic lexicons: mapping between terms and object descriptions. In: Huang, C.R., Calzolari, N., Gangemi, A., et al. (eds.) Ontology and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cimiano, P., Mccrae, J., Buitelaar, P., Montiel-Ponsoda, E.: On the role of senses in the ontology-lexicon. In: Oltramari, A., Vossen, P., Qin, L., Hovy, E. (eds.) New Trends of Research in Ontologies and Lexical Resources. Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing, pp. 43–62. Springer, Berlin (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31782-8_4

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Fiorelli, M., Stellato, A., McCrae, J.P., Cimiano, P., Pazienza, M.T.: LIME: the metadata module for OntoLex. In: Gandon, F., Sabou, M., Sack, H., d’Amato, C., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Zimmermann, A. (eds.) ESWC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9088, pp. 321–336. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18818-8_20

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiorelli, M., Pazienza, M.T., Stellato, A.: A meta-data driven platform for semi-automatic configuration of ontology mediators. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), Reykjavik, Iceland, pp. 26–31, May 2014

    Google Scholar 

  19. Resnik, P.: Disambiguating noun groupings with respect to WordNet senses. In: Armstrong, S., Church, K., Isabelle, P., Manzi, S., Tzoukermann, E., Yarowsky, D. (eds.) Natural Language Processing Using Very Large Corpora. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol. 11, pp. 77–98. Springer, Dordrecht (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2390-9_6

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: A survey of schema-based matching approaches. In: Spaccapietra, S. (ed.) Journal on Data Semantics IV. LNCS, vol. 3730, pp. 146–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11603412_5

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Lacasta, J., Nogueras-Iso, J., Falquet, G., Teller, J., Zarazaga-Soria, F.J.: Design and evaluation of a semantic enrichment process for bibliographic databases. Data Knowl. Eng. 88, 94–107 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Francesconi, E., Bartoloni, G.: Sharing knowledge by conceptual mapping: the case of EU thesaural interoperability. In: Proceedings of the JURIX Conference, pp. 17–26. IOS Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Modern Information Retrieval. Addison Wesley, Boston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liang, A.C., Sini, M.: Mapping AGROVOC and the Chinese agricultural thesaurus: definitions, tools, procedures. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimed. 12(1), 51–62 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Francesconi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 European Union

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schmitz, P., Francesconi, E., Hajlaoui, N., Batouche, B., Stellato, A. (2018). Semantic Interoperability of Multilingual Language Resources by Automatic Mapping. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E. (eds) Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. EGOVIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11032. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98348-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98349-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)