Skip to main content

Understanding the Challenges in Public Health Policymaking: Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Behavioural Policies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Public Health Policy Research ((PSPHPR))

  • 469 Accesses

Abstract

Loer and Ewert introduce the key issues of the book and initiate the discussion on contemporary public health policymaking: they point out how individual and societal parameters interfere with policy interventions. The introduction to the book explains how this idea of reciprocity will be combined with the current debate on struggles against lifestyles being (potentially) dangerous to health. The reader will learn how public health can be conceptualised in the light of the most relevant challenges to policymaking. Furthermore, the introduction gives a brief overview of the following chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baum, F., & Fisher, M. (2014). Why behavioural health promotion endures despite its failure to reduce health inequities. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(2), 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergenheim, S., Edman, J., Kananen, J., & Wessel, M. (2018). Conceptualising public health: An introduction. In J. Kananen, S. Bergenheim, & M. Wessel (Eds.), Conceptualising public health: Historical and contemporary struggles over key concepts (pp. 1–17). Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botzem, S., & Strassheim, H. (2016). On her majesty’s service? The behavioural insights team and its role in the global rise of behavioural change policies. Paper presented at the 44th ECPR Joint Sessions 2016, Workshop No. 2: Behavioural Change and Public Policy, Pisa, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavier, C., & de Leeuw, E. (2013). Health promotion and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, E. (2017). Engagement of sectors other than health in integrated health governance, policy, and action. Annual Review of Public Health, 38(1), 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. G., Barer, M. L., & Marmor, T. R. (1994). Why are some people healthy and others not? The determinants of the health of populations. Berlin/New York: Walter de gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fafard, P. (2015). Beyond the usual suspects: Using political science to enhance public health policy making. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 69(11), 1129–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, T. R. (2010). A framework for public health action: The health impact pyramid. American Journal of Public Health, 100(4), 590–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch, Y., & Barnes, A. J. (Eds.). (2017). Behavioral economics and healthy behaviors: Key concepts and current research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2011). Designing public policies. Principles and instruments. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, P. (2018). How far to nudge? Assessing behavioural public policy. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kananen, J., Bergenheim, S., & Wessel, M. (2018). Conceptualising public health: Historical and contemporary struggles over key concepts. Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch, I. (2007). Health governance: The health society. In D. V. McQueen, I. Kickbusch, & L. Potvin (Eds.), Health and modernity: The role of theory in health promotion (pp. 144–161). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W. (2001). Contentious institutions: An augmented rational-action analysis of the origins and path dependency of welfare state institutions in western countries. Rationality and Society, 13(2), 235–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D., Wismar, M., Lin, V., Jones, C. M., & Davies, M. (2012). Intersectoral governance for health in all policies: Structures, actions and experiences (Observatory Studies Series 26). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milio, N. (1981). Promoting health through public policy. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakhimovsky, S. S., Feigl, A. B., Avila, C., O’Sullivan, G., Macgregor-Skinner, E., & Spranca, M. (2016). Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce overweight and obesity in middle-income countries: A systematic review. PLoS One, 11(9), e0163358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). Social expenditure update – Social spending is falling in some countries, but in many others it remains at historically high levels. Retrieved June 14, 2018, from https://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD2014-SocialExpenditure_Update19Nov_Rev.pdf

  • Rootman, I., Pedersen, A., Frohlich, K., & Dupéré, S. (2017). Health promotion in Canada. In New perspectives on theory, practice, policy, and research (4th ed.). Toronto/Vancouver: Canadian Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruger, J. P. (2004). Health and social justice. Lancet, 364(9439), 1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (2018). Scope, modalities, format and organization of the third high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 12 April 2018. Retrieved June 14, 2018, from http://www.who.int/ncds/governance/third-un-meeting/A-RES-72-274.pdf?ua=1

  • Vedung, E. (2003). Policy instruments: Typologies and theories. In M.-L. Bemelmans-Videc, R. C. Rist, & E. Vedung (Eds.), Carrots, sticks & sermons. Policy instruments and their evaluation (pp. 21–58). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G., & Gough, I. (2006). A comparative welfare regime approach to global social policy. World Development, 34(10), 1696–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). Time to deliver: Report of the WHO Independent high-level commission on noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathrin Loer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Loer, K., Ewert, B. (2019). Understanding the Challenges in Public Health Policymaking: Introduction. In: Ewert, B., Loer, K. (eds) Behavioural Policies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Palgrave Studies in Public Health Policy Research. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98316-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics