Skip to main content

All You Need Is Love? Edward Thomas, Apostrophizing the Other

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Haunted Selves, Haunting Places in English Literature and Culture
  • 288 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a close reading of specific Thomas poems, while arguing for the necessity of close reading. Much close reading has been sacrificed in the critical drive to historicity and a ‘relevant’ contextualization of literary work. However, poetry demands attention to the singular, in a response to the other that is the voice of the poem. The poem is the trace of a ghost that returns in the act of reading to call the subject who reads. Taking the problem of Thomas as it has been understood in criticism as a starting point, I turn the focus of the reading of the poet back to the text as text. Examining in particular two poems, ‘Celandine’ and ‘The Unknown’, but also taking in various of his ‘nature’ poems, which are, I would argue, in a direct line from Hardy’s poetic work in the representation of the English landscape, I explore the relationship between the past, memory, love, the other, and place. For Thomas, the other is always spectral, always a revenant, and it is only through a close reading that the other comes back, not only to be understood, but to be seen, and felt, as well as heard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Levinas’ translator, Richard Cohen, observes of the bracketed phrase ‘field of forces’ that the expression recollects the Kantian transcendental aesthetic, Hegel’s analysis of ‘Force and the Understanding’ (sections 136-41 of The Phenomenology of Spirit), and less directly, (Levinas always having maintained a certain critical remoteness to Nietzsche) Nietzsche’s apprehension of the will to power and the impersonality of being, I being for Nietzsche, as Cohen puts it, ‘always a product of preconscious “it” made up of forces of contention’ (1987, 46–47 nn.16, 17). Cohen further traces a connection from Nietzsche to Deleuze’s reading of the I as product of affective intensity, in Nietzsche and Philosophy.

  2. 2.

    The ‘shine’, the coming-to-shine, the il y a or es gibt of the becoming-shine, from Swinburne , to Hardy , to Thomas, to Burnside , and in many other places, with many other names, may be said to be the trope of spectrality, its coming to appear, on the one hand, as the singular experience for the subject, and, on the other hand, the figure of poetry’s apperceptive disclosedness, that which is, simply, the poetic.

Bibliography

  • Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Willard R. Trask. Int. Edward W. Said. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. Selected Writings, Vol. 2: 1927–1934, trans. Rodney Livingstone et al., Ed. Michael W. Jennings, Howard Eiland, and Gary Smith. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. Time and the Other. Trans. Richard A. Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, Ruth. ‘The Turn to Affect: A Critique’. Critical Inquiry 37 (Spring 2011): 434–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longley, Edna. Under the Same Moon: Edward Thomas and the English Lyric. London: Enitharmon Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. Hillis. The Linguistic Moment: From Wordsworth to Stevens. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Charles E. The Time of Memory. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel, Martin. Aesthetics of Appearing, trans. John Farrell. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shouse, Eric. ‘Feeling, Emotion, Affect’, M/C Journal 8. December (2005): journal.media-culture.org.au/0512/03-shouse.php

  • Steigler, Bernard. Technics and Time, 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of the Machine, trans. Stephen Barker. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Edward. Collected Poems and War Diary, 1917. Ed. R. George Thomas. Int. Peter Sacks. London: Faber and Faber, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Edward. Walter Pater. London: Martin Secker, 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, William. Poetry’s Touch: On Lyric Address Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wolfreys, J. (2018). All You Need Is Love? Edward Thomas, Apostrophizing the Other. In: Haunted Selves, Haunting Places in English Literature and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98089-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics