Advertisement

Supply, Demand, and Major Short Sea Shipping Networks in Europe

  • Stratos Papadimitriou
  • Dimitrios V. Lyridis
  • Ioannis G. Koliousis
  • Vangelis Tsioumas
  • Eleftherios Sdoukopoulos
  • Peter J. Stavroulakis
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Maritime Economics book series (PSME)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the demand and supply of SSS services. It first focuses on the demand side and identifies the main cargoes by type and maritime region. The goods moved by short sea vessels are divided into six categories: liquid, dry bulk, containers, Roll on-Roll off (Ro-Ro) units, passengers, and other general cargo. Also, the chapter provides a detailed overview of the world’s main short sea shipping regions, highlighting the key routes and major corridors that have been established thus drawing a connection with several key emerging trends and developments that had a major impact or are currently affecting the short sea shipping sector. Next, the chapter turns to the supply side of the SSS market. The ship categorization corresponds to the carried cargoes. Finally, the chapter provides some statistical data about the stock of short sea ships.

Keywords

Supply Demand Feeders 

References

  1. Adland, R. 2017. On-demand container shipping. Splash, July 24. Retrieved from https://splash247.com/demand-container-shipping/.
  2. Campbell, James F. 1990. Freight consolidation and routing with transportation economies of scale. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 24 (5): 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Centre D’ Innovació del Transport (CENIT), Vito, COWI. 2015. Analysis of recent trends in EU shipping and analysis and policy support to improve the competitiveness of short sea shipping in the EU. Report prepared for the European Commission – Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport. Brussels.Google Scholar
  4. Donnelly, A., and J. Mazières. 1999. Short sea shipping: A viable alternative to overland transport. The Alliance of Maritime Regional Interests in Europe.Google Scholar
  5. European Community Shipowner’s Association (ECSA). 2016. Short sea shipping. The full potential yet to be unleashed. High level meeting on short sea shipping, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. 2013. Regulation No 1315/2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU. Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  7. Gulfstream Project. 2008. New maritime service consisting of a round trip on weekends between Spain and the UK. Marco Polo Conference.Google Scholar
  8. International Transport Forum (ITF) – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2015. The impact of mega-Ships. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Lindstad, Haakon, Bjørn E. Asbjørnslett, and Anders H. Strømman. 2012. The importance of economies of scale for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from shipping. Energy Policy 46: 386–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Medda, Francesca, and Lourdes Trujillo. 2010. Short-sea shipping: An analysis of its determinants. Maritime Policy & Management 37 (3): 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maritime transport statistics – short sea shipping of goods. Eurostat – Statistics Explained. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Maritime _transport_statistics_-_short_sea_shipping_of_goods. Accessed 25 July 2017.
  12. Paixão, A.C., and Peter B. Marlow. 2002. Strengths and weaknesses of short sea shipping. Marine Policy 26 (3): 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pastori, E. 2015. Modal share of freight transport to and from EU ports. Directorate-General for Internal Policies. Policy Department B: Structural and cohesion policies. Transport and Tourism. European Parliament.Google Scholar
  14. PROPS. Koliousis, I., Tzannatos, E., Pagkalou, E., Toumpoulidou, E., Papadimitriou, S., Trant, G., Katsoulakos, T., Bojkova, V., Pöntynen, R., Seidel, R., Vuorrenma, J., Cameron, J., Kramer, H., Zevgolis, D. 2010. Deliverable D7.2 - PROPS Final Report. (Grant Agreement No. TREN/FP7/TR/218621/”PROPS”). Brussels.Google Scholar
  15. The Norwegian Shipowners’ Association. 2017. Maritime outlook report.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stratos Papadimitriou
    • 1
  • Dimitrios V. Lyridis
    • 2
  • Ioannis G. Koliousis
    • 3
  • Vangelis Tsioumas
    • 4
  • Eleftherios Sdoukopoulos
    • 1
  • Peter J. Stavroulakis
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PiraeusPiraeusGreece
  2. 2.National Technical University of AthensZografouGreece
  3. 3.Coventry UniversityCoventryUK
  4. 4.The American College of GreeceAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations