Skip to main content

A Critical Review of Unpowered Performance Metrics of Impedance-Type Haptic Devices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
EuCoMeS 2018 (EuCoMeS 2018)

Part of the book series: Mechanisms and Machine Science ((Mechan. Machine Science,volume 59))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 712 Accesses

Abstract

A kinesthetic haptic device’s performance relies on unpowered, powered and controlled system characteristics. In this paper, a critical review is carried out for the well-known metrics for kinematics, stiffness and dynamic aspects of robots that can be applied in evaluating the unpowered system performance of kinesthetic haptic devices. The physical meanings of these metrics are discussed and the important factors that affect the unpowered system performance of a kinesthetic haptic device are revealed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Angeles, J.: Fundamentals of Robotic Mechanical Systems, vol. 2. Springer, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Asada, H.: A geometrical representation of manipulator dynamics and its application to arm design. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr. 105(3), 131–142 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carbone, G., Ceccarelli, M.: Comparison of indices for stiffness performance evaluation. Front. Mech. Eng. China 5(3), 270–278 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ceccarelli, M., Carbone, G., Ottaviano, E.: Multi criteria optimum design of manipulators. Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 53, 9–18 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, S.F., Kao, I.: Conservative congruence transformation for joint and cartesian stiffness matrices of robotic hands and fingers. Int. J. Robot. Res. 19(9), 835–847 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiu, S.L.: Kinematic characterization of manipulators: an approach to defining optimality. In: Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 828–833. IEEE (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gosselin, C.: Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 6(3), 377–382 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gosselin, C., Angeles, J.: A global performance index for the kinematic optimization of robotic manipulators. J. Mech. Des. 113(3), 220–226 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Graettinger, T.J., Krogh, B.H.: The acceleration radius: a global performance measure for robotic manipulators. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 4(1), 60–69 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan, W.A., Angeles, J.: The kinetostatic optimization of robotic manipulators: the inverse and the direct problems. J. Mech. Des. 128(1), 168–178 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, J.O., Khosla, K.: Dexterity measures for design and control of manipulators. In: IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems’ 91. Intelligence for Mechanical Systems, Proceedings IROS 1991, pp. 758–763. IEEE (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paul, R.P., Stevenson, C.N.: Kinematics of robot wrists. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2(1), 31–38 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pham, H.H., Chen, I.M.: Optimal synthesis for workspace and manipulability of parallel flexure mechanism. In: 11th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Tianjin, China, pp. 18–21, August 2003

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quennouelle, C., Gosselin, C.: Stiffness matrix of compliant parallel mehanisms. In: ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 151–161. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Salisbury, J.K., Craig, J.J.: Articulated hands: force control and kinematic issues. Int. J. Robot. Res. 1(1), 4–17 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Samur, E.: Performance Metrics for Haptic Interfaces. Springer, London (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshikawa, T.: Dynamic manipulability of robot manipulators. Trans. Soc. Instrum. Control Eng. 21(9), 970–975 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshikawa, T.: Manipulability of robotic mechanisms. Int. J. Robot. Res. 4(2), 3–9 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey via grant number 117M405.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Ismet Can Dede .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Görgülü, İ., Kiper, G., Dede, M.I.C. (2019). A Critical Review of Unpowered Performance Metrics of Impedance-Type Haptic Devices. In: Corves, B., Wenger, P., Hüsing, M. (eds) EuCoMeS 2018 . EuCoMeS 2018. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98020-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics