Abstract
Intermountain Healthcare has steadily improved outcomes and reduced the cost of care by providing physicians and other care providers validated and meaningful information about their quality and cost metrics compared to their peers. Clinicians voluntarily improve their performance as the best interests of their patients and their communities given their prime motivation for being in medicine. This chapter demonstrates the ways in which reliable data systems can be effectively used for clinician insight into the systems they practice in, which had not been transparent to them before. A top-tier healthcare delivery organization will commit substantial resources to collecting and sharing data on all aspects of healthcare delivery. This data spans the organizational level to the hospital level, to the specific unit level, and most importantly to the individual clinician level. Healthcare organizations need to commit substantial personnel and data analytic resources to build actionable reports that can be shared with clinicians in as close to real time as possible. Physician leaders need to be chosen, trained, empowered, and supported for their time to then educate their colleagues in the understanding of these reports and metrics. These clinician leaders are the best ones to educate their colleagues, who then voluntarily seek to improve their own patient care delivery and of their teams.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- APCs:
-
Advanced practice clinicians (including physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurse midwifes)
- DPCs:
-
Doctor procedure cards
- EMR:
-
Electronic medical record
- PSI 90:
-
Patient safety indicator 90 (a composite of multiple publicly report patient safety outcome metrics
- RBC:
-
Red blood cells
References
Pfunter A, Wier LM, Stocks CA. Most frequent procedures performed in U.S. hospitals, 2010: Statistical Brief #149. Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project (HCUP) statistical brief. Rockville; 2013. Sponsored by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US).
Rohde JM, Dimcheff DE, Blumberg N, Saints S, Langa KM, Kuhn L, et al. Healthcare-associated infections after red blood cell transfusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2014;311:1317–26.
Murphy GJ, Reeves BC, Rogers CA, Rizvi SI, Culliford L, Angelini GD. Increased mortality, postoperative morbidity, and cost after red cell transfusion in patients having cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2007;116:2544–52.
Hopewell S, Omar O, Hyde C, Yu LM, Doree C, Murphy MF. A systematic review of the effect of red blood cell transfusion on mortality; evidence from large-scale observational studies published between 2006 and 2010. BMJ Open. 2013;3(5). pii:e002154. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002154
National Healthcare Expenditures 2016 Highlights – CMS.gov. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/...and.../highlights.pdf
Oren J, Hutzler LH, Hunter T, Errico T, Zuckerman J, Bosco J. Decreasing spine implant costs and inter-physician cost variation: the impact of programme of cost containment on implant expenditure in spine surgery. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(8):1102–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ott, M.J., Olsen, G.H. (2019). Impact of Quality Assessment on Clinical Practice, Intermountain Healthcare. In: Ratliff, J., Albert, T., Cheng, J., Knightly, J. (eds) Quality Spine Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97990-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97990-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97989-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97990-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)