Abstract
The Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) continues to court controversy. Many ECOWAS countries together with other civil society organizations have expressed concern over the agreement and continue to campaign against it on grounds of possible damage to West Africa’s fragile economies from opening their markets to free trade with the European Union (EU). This notwithstanding, the objectives of the EPA highlight fundamental agreement between both EU and ECOWAS countries about the instrumental role that the agreement could play in pursuing sustainable development goals by recognizing the importance of implementing competitiveness, poverty alleviation strategies, ensuring EU assistance for structural transformation and embracing the principles of asymmetrical liberalization. The literature provides evidence to the fact that not every developing country integrating into the global economy may be considered positive because trade liberalization on its own cannot ensure the attainment of development objectives from an economic, social and environmental perspective.
This paper analyses the ECOWAS-EU EPA agreement attempting to answer the question: how does the agreement foster both international trade and inclusive development by promoting investment and sustainable growth? Using evidence from countries in the ECOWAS sub-region, this discussion paper covers the following thematic areas: (1) external sector development impact of the EPA agreement and (2) the impact on fostering inclusive growth and development. Our analyses indicate that the EPAs will pose a number of policy challenges for West African countries as their economies increasingly morph into the global economy. However, the EPA provides an opportunity to fast-track global trade and the regional integration agenda in West Africa. It is important that the EU treats the EPA as an instrument of development cooperation and not a conduit to pursue mercantilist corporate interests as did happen in colonial times. We also find out that balanced growth and poverty reduction are not automatic outcomes from liberalization processes, but rather these objectives must be actively promoted by complementary policies in conjunction with appropriate fiscal adjustments in order to fully gain from trade liberalization.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
West Africa is defined to include the 15 member states of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). See: http://www.ecowas.int/member-states/
- 2.
- 3.
Ibid.
- 4.
Ibid.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
Liberia is the “oldest republic” in Africa. It was the only territory in West Africa that was not colonized. Its capital, Monrovia, was founded in 1822 by freed slaves resettled by the American Colonization Society.
- 13.
The Lomé Convention was renewed every 5 years until its expiration in 2000.
- 14.
- 15.
The delays in the negotiating process precipitated the initialling of an interim Economic Partnership Agreement (iEPA) by Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana in December 2007.
- 16.
The ratification process is being delayed further as a result of some more objections from Nigeria.
- 17.
- 18.
Ibid.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
Ibid.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
Local content is defined here to include the domestic sourcing of raw materials, labour and other factor inputs to the production process.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.
Ibid.
- 29.
- 30.
- 31.
Ibid.
- 32.
Theoretical tariff upper band.
- 33.
Supra.
- 34.
Supra.
- 35.
The NTEs sector has overtaken cocoa as Ghana’s third highest export earner. The government of Ghana has an annual revenue target of US$5 billion from the export of non-traditional products within the next 5 years, under the Ghana National Strategy for the non-traditional export sector. Total earnings from Ghana’s non-traditional export sector were driven by three main sub-sectors: namely agriculture, processed and semi-processed foods, and handicrafts. Cocoa paste, cashew nuts, articles of plastic and canned tuna took the top-four spot for top-10 non-traditional export items, contributing 40.35% to total non-traditional exports. Others were veneers, natural rubber sheets, animal feed, medicinal plants, aluminium plates and iron/steel products. See: http://ghanaports.gov.gh/news/1054/ghana-chalks over-usd2bn-from-non-traditional-exports
- 36.
- 37.
The “GSP+” enhanced preferences mean full removal of tariffs on essentially the same product categories as those covered by the general arrangement. These are granted to countries which ratify and implement core international conventions relating to human and labour rights, environment and good governance. See: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/development/generalised-scheme-of-preferences/index_en.htm
- 38.
The UNDP describes extreme or multi-dimensional poverty using ten indicators. Where a person falls into three of the indicators, they are said to be in multi-dimensional poverty. See Technical Note 5 at http://hdr.undp.org for more details.
- 39.
- 40.
- 41.
References
Acheampong, T., Omane-Achamfuor, M., & Anang T. N. (2014). The economic partnership agreement between Ghana and the European Union: A developmental game changer? Ghana Growth and Development Platform Working Paper 2. Accessed June 15, 2016, from http://ghanagdp.org/file/2014/08/GGDP_WP2_Ghana-and-EPA.pdf
ActionAid Ghana. (2003). Ghana under interim Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA): Analysis of socioeconomic development and policy options under the interim EPA regime with the European Union. Accessed June 18, 2016, from http://www.actionaid.org/sites/files/actionaid/actionaid_ghana_research_-_ghana_under_interim_epa_and_implications_for_socio-economic_development.pdf
African Development Bank. (2015). African Economic Outlook 2015: Resilient economies, positive forecast for West Africa. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.afdb.org/en/blogs/measuring-the pulse-of-economic-transformation-in-west-africa/post/african-economic-outlook-2015-resilient economies-positive-forecast-for-west-africa-14406/
Aning, K., & Atta-Asamoah, A. (2011). Demography, environment and conflict in West Africa. Occasional Paper No. 34. Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre. Accessed May 23, 2016, from http://www.kaiptc.org/Publications/Occasional-Papers/Documents/Occasional Paper-34-Aning-and-Asamoah.aspx
Bagooro, S. (2014). West Africa and Europe trade: Who will benefit more? Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/06/west-africa-europe-trade agree-2014621155835409177.html
Berg, M. A., & Krueger, A. O. (2003). Trade, growth, and poverty: A selective survey (No. 3-30). International Monetary Fund.
Bortolot, A. I. (2003) Trade relations among European and African Nations. In Heilbrunn timeline of art history. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/aftr/hd_aftr.htm
Chandran, V. G. R., & Munusamy. (2009). Trade openness and manufacturing growth in Malaysia. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(5), 637–647.
Chang, R., Kaltani, L., & Loayza, N. V. (2009). Openness can be good for growth: The role of policy complementarities. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 33–49.
Chen, B. L. (1999). Trade openness and economic growth: Evidence in East Asia and Latin America. Journal of Economic Integration, 14, 265–295.
Easterly, W. (2007). Inequality does cause underdevelopment: Insights from a new instrument. Journal of Development Economics, 84(2), 755–776.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2014). International trade and inclusive development: Building synergies. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.cepal.org/en/publications/37040-international-trade-and-inclusive-development building-synergies
Edwards, S. (1993). Openness, trade liberalization, and growth in developing countries. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 1358–1393.
European Commission. (2016a). Aid for Trade – Trade – European Commission. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/development/aid-for-trade
European Commission. (2016b). Overview of economic partnership agreements. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/september/tradoc_144912.pdf
European Commission. (2016c). ACP – The Cotonou Agreement – International Cooperation and Development – European Commission. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/where/acp/overview/cotonou-agreement/index_en.htm
Eusufzai, Z. (1998). Do more open countries have a higher growth rate but more inequality? Atlantic Economic Journal, 26(1), 32–43.
Ferreira, F. H. G. (1999). Inequality and economic performance: A brief overview to theories of growth and distribution. Accessed May 8, 2016, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPGI/Resources/Inequality/ferreira.pdf
Frankel, J. A., & Romer, D. (1999). Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 89, 379–399.
Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (2005). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 85–91.
Galor, O. (2009). Inequality and economic development: An overview. Inequality and economic development: The modern perspective. Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing.
Gries, T., & Redlin, M. (2012, June). Trade openness and economic growth: A panel causality analysis. In International Conferences of RCIE, KIET, and APEA, March (pp. 16–18).
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grynberg, R. (1998). The WTO incompatibility of the Lomé convention trade provisions. The Asia Pacific school of economics and management. Working Papers 98/3. Accessed April 29, 2016, from https://crawford.anu.edu.au/pdf/wp98/sp98-3.pdf
Hanson, K. T., & Leautier, F. (2013). Jobless economic growth in Africa: Is there a role for agriculture? Journal of African Development, 15(2), 1–17.
Huchet-Bourdon, M., Le Mouël, C. L. M., & Vijil, M. (2011). The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. In XIIIème Congrès de l’Association Européenne des Economistes Agricoles (EAAE).
Krugman, P. R. (1986). Strategic trade policy and the new international economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Le, M. S. (2014). Trade openness and household welfare within a country: A microeconomic analysis of Vietnamese households. Journal of Asian Economics, 33, 56–70.
Lee, H. Y., Ricci, L. A., & Rigobon, R. (2004). Once again, is openness good for growth? Journal of Development Economics, 75(2), 451–472.
Lisk, F. (2015). Boosting investment for transformative growth and competitiveness in African economies: A review of trends, policies, development challenges and prospects. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.crepol.org/_literature_136471/Boosting_Investment_for_Transformative_Growth_and_Competitiveness
Morgan, R., & Katsikeas, C. (1997). Theories of international trade, foreign direct investment and firm internationalization: A critique. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/business/distance/Economics/Reading/Critique_trade_theories.pdf
Mustafa, G., Rizov, M., & Kernohan, D. (2013). Openness, economic growth, and human development: The Asian experience. Accessed June 11, 2016, from https://editorialexpress.com/cgibin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=GPEN2013&paper_id=52
Nourzad, F., & Powell, J. J. (2003). Openness, growth, and development: Evidence from a panel of developing countries. Scientific Journal of Administrative Development, 1, 72–94.
Nwoke, C. O. (2009). EU-ECOWAS economic partnership agreement: Nigeria’s role in securing development-focus and regional integration. Accessed February 12, 2016, from https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Knowledge/2009%20AEC-%20EUECOWAS%20Economic%20Partnership%20Agreement%20Nigeria%27s%20Role%20in%20ensurnig%20Development-Focus%20and%20Regional%20Integration.pdf
Pacheco-López, P., & Thirlwall, A. P. (2011). Has trade liberalisation in poor countries delivered the promises expected? In Market liberalism, growth, and economic development in Latin America (pp. 7–25). London: Routledge.
Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income distribution, and democracy: What the data say. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 149–187.
Ricardo, D. (1817). Principles of political economy in P. Saffra (Ed.) (1951). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. 1. London: Cambridge University Press
Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. London: Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications.
Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1995) Natural resource abundance and economic growth. NBER Working Papers, No. 5398. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Sinha, D., & Sinha, T. (2002). Openness, investment and economic growth in Asia. Indian Economic Journal, 49(4), 90–95.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, edited by E. Cannan (1961) and reprinted by Methuen, London
Sy, A. (2014). Jobless growth in sub-Saharan Africa. The Brookings Institution. Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/africa-in-focus/posts/2014/01/30-jobless-growth-africa-sy
Tahir, M., & Khan, I. (2014). Trade openness and economic growth in the Asian region. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 7(3), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcefts-05-20140006.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2015). World investment report: Reforming international investment governance. Accessed June 10, 2016, from http://www.unctad.org/wir
United Nations Development Programme. (2015). Human development report: Work for human development. Accessed June 8, 2016, from http://hdr.undp.org/2015-report
Winters, A. L. (2002). Trade liberalisation and poverty: What are the links? Accessed 11 June, 2016, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRSUMESSD/Resources/1729402 - 1150389437293/Winters_Trade_Lib_and_Poverty_World_Ec_2002.pdf
World Bank. (2014). Trade liberalization: Why so much controversy? Accessed June 11, 2016, from http://www1.worldbank.org/prem/lessons1990s/chaps/05-Ch05_kl.pdf
World Trade Organization. (2002). Annual report. Accessed May 23, 2016 from https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/anrep_e/anrep02_e.pdf
Yanikkaya, H. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth: A cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 57–89.
Yusoff, M., & Febrina, I. (2012). Trade openness, exchange rate, gross domestic investment, and growth in Indonesia. Accessed June 13, 2016, from http://iafor.org/archives/offprints/acss2012offprints/ACSS2012_0108.pdf
Yusuf, M., Malarvizhi, C. A., & Khin, A. A. (2013). Trade liberalization economic growth and poverty reduction in Nigeria. Available at SSRN 2371117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: West Africa Statistics
Appendix: West Africa Statistics
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Acheampong, T., Ortsin, E.A. (2019). The ECOWAS–EU Economic Partnership Agreement: Towards Inclusive Development?. In: Seck, D. (eds) The External Sector of Africa's Economy. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97913-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97913-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97912-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97913-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)