Advertisement

Social Network Structure as a Predictor of Social Behavior: The Case of Protest in the 2016 US Presidential Election

  • Molly Renaud
  • Rostyslav KorolovEmail author
  • David Mendonça
  • William Wallace
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 836)

Abstract

This research explores relationships between social network structure (as inferred from Twitter posts) and the occurrence of domestic protests following the 2016 US Presidential Election. A hindcasting method is presented which exploits Random Forest classification models to generate predictions about protest occurrence that are then compared to ground truth data. Results show a relationship between social network structure and the occurrence of protests that is stronger or weaker depending on the time frame of prediction.

Keywords

Social network Protest Collective action Mobilization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is sponsored by the Army Research Laboratory, accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-09-2-0053 (the ARL Network Science CTA). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation hereon.

References

  1. 1.
    Steinert-Threlkeld, Z.C., Mocanu, D., Vespignani, A., Fowler, J.: Online social networks and offline protest. EPJ Data Sci. 4(1), 19 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Compton, R., Lee, C., Xu, J., Artieda-Moncada, L., Lu, T.C., De Silva, L., Macy, M.: Using publicly visible social media to build detailed forecasts of civil unrest. Secur. Inform. 3(1), 4 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Korolov, R., Lu, D., Wang, J., Zhou, G., Bonial, C., Voss, C., Kaplan, L., Wallace, W., Han, J., Ji, H.: On predicting social unrest using social media. In: 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pp. 89–95, August 2016Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kallus, N.: Predicting crowd behavior with big public data. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 625–630. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oh, O., Eom, C., Rao, H.R.: Research note—role of social media in social change: an analysis of collective sense making during the 2011 Egypt revolution. Inf. Syst. Res. 26(1), 210–223 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tufekci, Z., Wilson, C.: Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: observations from Tahrir Square. J. Commun. 62(2), 363–379 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cadena, J., Korkmaz, G., Kuhlman, C.J., Marathe, A., Ramakrishnan, N., Vullikanti, A.: Forecasting social unrest using activity cascades. PLoS ONE 10(6), e0128879 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Snow, D.A., Soule, S.A., Kriesi, H.: The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Wiley, London (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dalton, R., Van Sickle, A., Weldon, S.: The individual-institutional nexus of protest behaviour. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 40(1), 51–73 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Furusawa, K.: Participation and protest in the European union and the ‘outsider’ states. Contemp. Polit. 12(2), 207–223 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dalton, R.J.: Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. CQ Press, Thousand Oaks (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klandermans, B., Oegema, D.: Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: steps towards participation in social movements. Am. Sociol. Rev. 52(4), 519–531 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuran, T.: Sparks and prairie fires: a theory of unanticipated political revolution. Public Choice 61(1), 41–74 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klandermans, B., Van der Toorn, J., Van Stekelenburg, J.: Embeddedness and identity: how immigrants turn grievances into action. Am. Sociol. Rev. 73(6), 992–1012 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barberá, P., Wang, N., Bonneau, R., Jost, J.T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J., González-Bailón, S.: The critical periphery in the growth of social protests. PLoS ONE 10(11), e0143611 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., García, I., Cauhé, E., Ferrer, A., Ferrer, D., Francos, D., Iniguez, D., Pérez, M.P., Ruiz, G., et al.: Structural and dynamical patterns on online social networks: the Spanish May 15th movement as a case study. PLoS ONE 6(8), e23883 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morales, A., Losada, J., Benito, R.: Users structure and behavior on an online social network during a political protest. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 391(21), 5244–5253 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Le, H.K., Pasternack, J., Ahmadi, H., Gupta, M., Sun, Y., Abdelzaher, T., Han, J., Roth, D., Szymanski, B., Adali, S.: Apollo: towards factfinding in participatory sensing. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 129–130, April 2011Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bosch, A., Zisserman, A., Munoz, X.: Image classification using random forests and ferns. In: 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1–8, October 2007Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kohavi, R.: A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 1995, San Francisco, CA, USA, vol. 2, pp. 1137–1143. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Los Altos (1995)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liaw, A., Wiener, M.: Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2(3), 18–22 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Molly Renaud
    • 1
  • Rostyslav Korolov
    • 1
    Email author
  • David Mendonça
    • 1
  • William Wallace
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations