Abstract
Aerodynamic shape optimization has established itself as a valuable tool in the engineering design process to achieve highly efficient results. A central aspect for such approaches is the mapping from the design parameters which encode the geometry of the shape to be improved to the quality criteria which describe its performance. The choices to be made in the setup of the optimization process strongly influence this mapping and thus are expected to have a profound influence on the achievable result. In this work we explore the influence of such choices on the effects on the shape optimization of a turbofan rotor blade as it can be realized within an aircraft engine design process. The blade quality is assessed by realistic three dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. We investigate the outcomes of several optimization runs which differ in various configuration options. We compare the results from the covariance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy (CMA-ES) with the outcome of a particle swarm optimization (PSO). We also investigate the changes induced by a different initialization of the CMA-ES and by a variation of its population size. A particular focus is put on the variation of the results if we use different number of degrees of freedom for parametrization of the rotor blade geometry. For all such variations, we generally find that the achievable improvement of the blade quality is comparable for most settings and thus rather insensitive to the details of the setup. On the other hand, even supposedly minor changes in the settings, such as using a different random seed for the initialization of the optimizer algorithm, lead to very different shapes. Optimized shapes which show comparable performance usually differ quite strongly in their geometries over the complete blade. Our analyses indicate that the fitness landscape for such a realistic turbofan rotor blade optimization is highly multi-modal with many local optima, where very different shapes show similar performance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Endicott, G., Olhofer, M., Arima, T., Sonoda, T.: A Novel Transonic Fan Swept Outlet Guide Vane Using 3D Design Optimization. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo (2014). Skinner, S., Zare-Behtash, H.: State-of-the-art in aerodynamic shape optimisation methods. Appl. Soft Comput. 62, 933–962 (2017)
Sieger, D., Menzel, S., Botsch, M.: Constrained space deformation for design optimization. Procedia Eng. 82, 114–126 (2014). Sonoda, T., Schnell, R., Arima, T., Endicott, G., Nicke, E.: A study of a modern transonic fan rotor in a low reynolds number regime for a small turbofan engine. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2013 (2013). Kaandorp, M., Menzel, S, Schmitt, S.: An aerodynamic perspective on shape deformation methods. In: AIAA AVIATION Forum (AIAA 2017-3145) (2017)
Bonyadi, M.R., Michalewicz, Z.: Particle swarm optimization for single objective continuous space problems: a review. Evol. Comput. 25, 1–54 (2017)
Hansen, N.: The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Comparing Review. Towards a New Evolutionary Computation. Springer, pp. 1769–1776 (2006)
Hicks, R., Henne, P.: Wing design by numerical optimization. J. Aircraft 15, 407–413 (1978). Wu, H., Yang, S., Liu, F.: Comparison of three geometric representations of airfoils for aerodynamic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, vol. 4095 (2003)
Honda R&D Technical Review 26(2) (2014)
Rusche, H., Schmitt, S.: Stability improvements of pressure-based compressible solver and validation for industrial turbo machinery applications. In: 4th Annual OpenFOAM User Conference 2016 (2016)
Mengistu, T., Ghaly, W.: Aerodynamic optimization of turbomachinery blades using evolutionary methods and ANN-based surrogate models. Optim. Eng. 9, 239–255 (2008)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Hisato Tanaka, Kunio Nakakita, Jiří Šimonek, Radek Máca and Tomáš Krátký for valuable discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kmec, J., Schmitt, S. (2019). Exploring the Fitness Landscape of a Realistic Turbofan Rotor Blade Optimization. In: Rodrigues, H., et al. EngOpt 2018 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering Optimization. EngOpt 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97773-7_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97773-7_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97772-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97773-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)