Globalization and National Income Inequality: Observations and Lessons from the U.S. Experience

  • Danny M. LeipzigerEmail author
Conference paper


Significant changes in the global economy with respect to trade, investment and technology are casting a shadow over the system at a time when concerns about who has benefited from globalization and who has not is affecting the conduct of national economic policies. Widening inequality in many countries, but principally the U.S., is a concern since America is still the world’s largest and in many respects most open economy. A shift away from openness would harm not only emerging market economies, but also create worries for the maintenance of the system. For this reason, exploring what has driven the rising income inequality in the U.S. is important to understand and this paper lays out those trends in the context of broader issues affecting the future of globalization.


  1. Acemoglu, D., Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G., & Price, B. (2016). Import competition and the Great US Employment Sag of 2000s. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(1): pt. 2, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Autor, D., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. (2015). Untangling trade and technology: Evidence from local labour markets. The Economic Journal, 125(May), 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloom, N. (2014). Fluctuations in uncertainty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birdsall, N., Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2000). Stuck in the tunnel: Is globalization muddling the middle class?Google Scholar
  5. Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). Track how technology is transforming work. Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science. Retrieved November 13, 2017, from
  6. Clement, F., Blair, H., & Trokel, N. (2016). Corporate tax chartbook: How corporations rig the rules to dodge the taxes they owe. Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from November 8, 2017, from
  7. Constantinescu, C., Mattoo, A., & Ruta, M. (2015). The global trade slowdown: Cyclical or structural?. IMF. Retrieved November 13, 2017, from
  8. Corak, M. (2006). Do poor children become poor adults? Lessons from a cross-country comparison of generational earnings mobility. Dynamics of inequality and poverty (pp. 143–188). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  9. Corak, M. (2013). Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Addio, A. (2007). Intergenerational transmission of disadvantage: mobility or immobility across generations? A Review of Evidence for OECD Countries: OECDGoogle Scholar
  11. Donnan, S., & Fleming, S. (2015). America’s middle-class meltdown: Core shrinks to half of US Homes. Financial Times. Retrieved from November 9, 2017, from–11e5-95c7-d47aa298f769.
  12. Estache, A., & Leipziger, D. (2009). Stuck in the middle: Is fiscal policy failing the middle class. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  13. Frey, C., Osborne, M. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Gangnes, B., Ma, A., & Van Assche, A. (2015). Global value chains and the trade-income relationship. In B. Hoekman (Ed.). The Global Trade Slowdown: A New Normal? pp. 111–126. CEPR Press and A ebook.Google Scholar
  15. Graham, C. (2008). Economics of happiness. In Blume, L., & Durlauf, S. (eds). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  16. Graham, C., & Lora, E. (2009). Paradox and perception: Measuring quality of life in latin America. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  17. Greenstone, M., & Looney, A. (2012). Just how progressive is the U.S. Tax Code?. Brookings Institute. Retrieved November 9, 2017, from
  18. IP Commission Report (2017). The Theft of American Intellectual Property: Reassessments of the Challenge and United States Policy. Update to IP Commission Report, May 2013. National Bureau of Asian Research.Google Scholar
  19. Kim, K., & Leipziger, D. (1997). Korea: A case of government-led development. In Leipziger (ed). Lessons from East Asia: 155–212. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  20. Leipziger, D., & Dodev, V. (2016). Disruptive technologies and their implications for economic policy: Some preliminary observations. Institute of International Economic Policy: The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  21. Leipziger, D. (2017). Make globalization more inclusive or suffer the consequences. The Growth Dialogue. Policy Brief, p. 13.Google Scholar
  22. Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKinsey Global Institute (2017). A future that works: Automation, employment, and productivity. McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
  24. Office of the Vice President (2010). Annual Report of the White House Task Force on the Middle Class. Retrieved from November 13 2017, from
  25. Pechman, J. (1985). Who paid the taxes, 1966–85? Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  26. Pew Research Center (2015). The American middle class is losing ground. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from November 11, 2017, from
  27. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2007). How progressive is the U.S. federal tax system? A historical and international perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Winter 2017, 21(1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2016). Distributional national accounts: Methods and estimates for the United States.Google Scholar
  30. Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  31. Rodrik, D. (2017). Straight talk on trade: Ideas for a sane world economy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  33. Stiglitz, J. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s dividend society endangers our future. W.W, Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Congress (2012). The impact of intellectual property theft on the economy. Joint Economic Committee.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations