Abstract
In a context characterised by increased influxes of migrants in the European Union (EU), little attention has been paid to the EU’s policy on the integration of third country nationals. This book’s introduction formulates the research puzzle that guides subsequent chapters: can there be Europeanization without an EU competence? It starts by clarifying a number of points in order to better frame the puzzle at hand: why integrating, who integrating, how to integrate, who has the competence to integrate and integrating into what are the questions it answers. The introduction then reviews the literature on integration in a multilevel polity and proposes a definition for the concept of soft-Europeanization to be applied throughout this book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a comprehensive analysis on immigration to the EU as well as integration outcomes, see OECD (2016).
- 2.
So argues the EU Commission, see European Commission (2011), for more on this.
- 3.
Many studies have looked into this issue, see TNS Qual+ (2011), for qualitative data within the EU.
- 4.
The challenges immigration poses are plentiful, they range from discrimination on the labour market to spatial and residential segregation, racism, etc. (see inter alia Castles et al. 2013). It is not my purpose to treat these challenges. I will therefore not go further on this point.
- 5.
Realising the potential of migration has been a recurring theme of the EU integration policy from 2003 onwards; see notably COM (2003) 336 final.
- 6.
See Council of the European Union 14776/04 (2004); recitals 4–8.
- 7.
In its report produced by the European Court of Auditors, the latter recognised the positive effect of the policy on the integration of migrants; see European Court of Auditors (2012).
- 8.
See Chapter 2 for more on the OMC and its failed attempt at immigration-related matters.
- 9.
For an interesting approach to the “it depends” answer, see Tilly and Goodin (2011).
- 10.
See above; or see Council of the European Union 14776/04 (2004).
- 11.
- 12.
In fact, a Spanish worker in Germany may need German courses; or a member of the Roma community may need to attend integration practices in the country she or he is a citizen of.
- 13.
The refugee status stems from the 1951 Geneva Convention. There exist other protection permits granted by member states that do not fall under the Geneva Convention. These are permits defined under national law and thus fall within the definition of migrant endorsed here.
- 14.
See Kostakopoulou (2002a), for a typology of models and their respective goals.
- 15.
- 16.
A role was eventually granted with the Treaty of Lisbon but the policy evolved without a legal basis, notably from 2002 to 2007 (date of the adoption of the European Integration Fund ).
- 17.
- 18.
See Box 3.2.
- 19.
The existence of national criteria to be fulfilled to be granted a legal residence permit bears witness to that.
- 20.
This is also the case for the long-term residence permit.
- 21.
- 22.
See Van Wolleghem (2014), for a discussion.
- 23.
See notably Gunningham and Sinclair (1998), on visibility and controversy.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
As just stated, in the case of soft law , the burden is placed on national governments evolving in national contexts with national actors ; hence a focus on member states’ individual response instead of diffusion-like mechanisms. Note in addition that this is one of the conclusions reached by Mulcahy (2011): no cross-country diffusion but rather national dynamics.
- 28.
Except Denmark that does not participate in AFSJ policies and Croatia that was not a member state at the time.
- 29.
Process tracing is a commonly used qualitative method; a detailed description is therefore not necessary here. Some references are provided to the reader interested in learning more about it in the appendices.
- 30.
- 31.
Such documents are of different sorts, they range from unpublicised minutes of expert committees to public pieces of information available on EU websites. See appendices for more on the data collected.
References
Scholarship and Expert References
Acosta Arcarazo, D. (2014). EU Integration Policy: Between Soft Law and Hard Law (Fondazione ISMU, KING Project, Desk Research Paper, No. 1).
Anderson, B., & Blinder, S. (2015). Who Counts as a Migrant? Definitions and Their Consequences. The Migration Observatory. Available at http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/who-counts-as-a-migrant-definitions-and-their-consequences/. Last Consulted November 12, 2016.
Bache, I. (2005). Europeanization and Britain: Towards Multi-level Governance? Paper prepared for the EUSA 9th Biennial Conference in Austin, Texas, March 31–April 2.
Beck, N. (2006). Time-Series–Cross-Section Methods. No. draft as of June 5.
Bercusson, B. (2009). European Labour Law (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Börzel, T. A. (2001). Non-compliance in the European Union: Pathology or Statistical Artefact? Journal of European Public Policy, 8(5), 803–824.
Bӧrzel, T. A. (2002). Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging, and Fence-Sitting: Member State Responses to Europeanization. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 193–214.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Bribosia, E. (2012). Les Politiques D’intégration de l’Union Européenne et Des Etats Membres à L’épreuve Du Principe de Non-Discrimination. In Y. Pascouau & T. Strik (Eds.), Which Integration Policies for Migrants? Interaction Between the EU and its Member States (pp. 51–82). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
Brubaker, R. (2001). The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and Its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.
Caporaso, J. (2007). The Three Worlds of Integration Theory. In P. R. Graziano (Ed.), Europeanization: New Research Agendas (pp. 23–34). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carens, J. H. (2000). Culture, Citizenship, and Community a Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carrera, S. (2006). A Comparison of Integration Programmes in the EU. Trends and Weaknesses. (Centre for European Policy Studies, Challenge, No. 1).
Carrera, S. (2008). Benchmarking Integration in the EU: Analyzing the Debate on Integration Indicators and Moving It Forward. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.
Carrera, S. (2009). In Search of the Perfect Citizen? The Intersection Between Integration, Immigration and Nationality in the EU. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Carrera, S., & Faure Atger, A. (2011). Integration as a Two-Way Process in the EU? Assessing the Relationship Between the European Integration Fund and the Common Basic Principles. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
Carrera, S., & Wiesbrock, A. (2009). Civic Integration of Third-Country Nationals Nationalism versus Europeanization in the Common EU Immigration Policy. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
Castles, S. (1995). How Nation-States Respond to Immigration and Ethnic Diversity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 21(3), 293–308.
Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2013). The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modern World (5th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Caviedes, A. (2004). The Open Method of Co-ordination in Immigration Policy: A Tool for Prying Open Fortress Europe? Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 289–310.
Checkel, J. T. (2005). It’s the Process Stupid! Process Tracing in the Study of European and International Politics (ARENA Centre for European Studies Working Papers No. 26), University of Oslo.
Collett, E. (2011). Immigrant Integration in Europe in a Time of Austerity. Migration Policy Institute. Available at http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/TCM-immigrant-integration-europe-time-austerity. Last Consulted November 12, 2016.
Collier, D. (2011). Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830.
de Haas, H., & Czaika, M. (2013). Measuring Migration Policies: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections. Migration and Citizenship, 1(2), 40–47.
European Commission. (2011). The 2012 Ageing Report: Underlying Assumptions and Projection Methodologies. Brussels: European Commission.
Exadaktylos, T., & Radaelli, C. M. (2012). Looking for Causality in the Literature on Europeanization. In T. Exadaktylos & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), Research Design in European Studies: Establishing Causality in Europeanization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Featherstone, K. (2003). Introduction: In the Name of “Europe”. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The Politics of Europeanization (pp. 3–26). New York: Oxford University Press.
Geddes, A. (2004). Britain, France, and EU Anti-discrimination Policy: The Emergence of an EU Policy Paradigm. West European Politics, 27(2), 334–353.
Geddes, A., & Achtnich, M. (2015). Research-Policy Dialogues in the European Union. In P. Scholten, H. Entzinger, R. Penninx, & S. Verbeek (Eds.), Integrating Immigrants in Europe. Research-Policy Dialogues (pp. 293–314). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.
Gilardoni, G., D’odorico, M., & Carrillo, D. (2015). KING Knowledge for Integration Governance Evidence on Migrants’ Integration in Europe. Milan: Fondazione ISMU.
Groenendijk, K. (2004). Legal Concepts of Integration in EU Migration Law. European Journal of Migration and Law, 6(2), 111–126.
Groenendijk, K., Fernhout, R., van Dam, D., van Oers, R., & Strik, T. (2007). The Family Reunification Directive in EU Member States: The First Year of Implementation. Nijmegen: Centre for Migration Law.
Guiraudon, V. (2003). The Constitution of a European Immigration Policy Domain: A Political Sociology Approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(2), 263–282.
Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Designing Smart Regulation. OECD and International Energy Agency.
Hailbronner, K. (2010). Implications of the EU Lisbon Treaty on EU Immigration Law. Paper Prepared for the Transatlantic Exchange for Academics in Migration Studies, San Diego.
Halleskov, L. (2005). The Long-Term Residents Directive: A Fulfilment of the Tampere Objective of Near-Equality? European Journal of Migration and Law, 7(2), 181–202.
Hammar, T. (1990). Democracy and the Nation State: Aliens, Denizens and Citizens in a World of International Migration. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Handoll, J. (2012). Integration Policy in the European Union: The Question of Competence. In Y. Pascouau & T. Strik (Eds.), Which Integration Policies for Migrants? Interaction Between the EU and Its Member States (pp. 15–50). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
Harvey, W. S. (2011). Strategies for Conducting Elite Interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441.
Hauschild, C. (2008). Die Integration von Zuwanderern. Ein Neues Politikfeld Für Die Europäische Union. In S. Magiera, K.-P. Sommermann, & J. Ziller (Eds.), Verwaltungswissenschaft und Verwaltungspraxis in nationaler und transnationaler Perspektive (pp. 59–74). Berlin: Duncker & Humbliot.
Helbling, M. (2013). Validating Integration and Citizenship Policy Indices. Comparative European Politics, 11(5), 555–576.
Helbling, M., Bjerre, L., Römer, F., & Zobel, M. (2013). The Immigration Policies in Comparison (IMPIC) Index: The Importance of a Sound Conceptualization. Migration and Citizenship, 1(2), 8–14.
Hepburn, E. (2010). “Citizens of the Region”: Party Conceptions of Regional Citizenship and Immigrant Integration. European Journal of Political Research, 50(4), 504–529.
Kate, M.-A., & Niessen, J. (2007). Locating Immigrant Integration Policy Measures in the Machinery of the European Commission. European Programme for Integration and Migration.
Keating, M. (2009). Social Citizenship, Devolution and Policy Divergence. In S. L. Greer (Ed.), Devolution and Social Citizenship in the UK (pp. 97–116). Bristol: Policy Press.
Keman, H. (2011). Comparative Research Methods. In D. Caramani (Ed.), Comparative Politics (2nd ed., pp. 50–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kostakopoulou, T. (2002a). “Integrating” Non-EU Migrants in the European Union: Ambivalent Legacies and Mutating Paradigms. Columbia Journal of European Law, 8(2), 181–201.
Kostakopoulou, T. (2002b). Long-Term Resident Third-Country Nationals in the European Union: Normative Expectations and Institutional Openings. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(3), 443–462.
Kundnani, A. (2012). Multiculturalism and Its Discontents: Left, Right and Liberal. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(2), 155–166.
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lanzieri, G. (2010). Fewer, Older and Multicultural? A Projection of the Populations of the European Union Member States by Foreign/National Background. (Eurostat Statistical Working Paper).
López-Santana, M. (2007). Soft Europeanization? How the Soft Pressure from Above Affects the Bottom (Differently): The Belgian, Spanish and Swedish Experiences. (EUI Working Papers, Vol. 10).
Mahoney, J. (2010). After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research. World Politics, 62(1), 120–147.
Miller, D. (2008). Immigrants, Nations, and Citizenship. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(4), 371–390.
Mügge, L., & van der Haar, M. (2016). Who Is an Immigrant and Who Requires Integration? Categorizing in European Policies. In B. Garcés-Mascareñas & R. Penninx (Eds.), Integration Processes and Policies in Europe. Contexts, Levels and Actors. (pp. 77–90). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.
Mulcahy, S. (2011). Europe’s Migrant Policies: Illusions of Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Murphy, C. (2009). Immigration, Integration and Citizenship in European Union Law: The Position of Third Country Nationals. Hibernian Law Journal, 8, 155–177.
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
OECD. (2016). Recruiting Immigrant Workers: Europe. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Oosterom-Staples, H. (2007). The Family Reunification Directive: A Tool Preserving Member State Interest or Conducive to Family Unity? In A. Baldaccini, H. Toner, & P. E. Guild (Eds.), Whose Freedom, Security and Justice? EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy (pp. 451–488). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Penninx, R. (2009). Decentralising Integration Policies. Managing Integration in Cities, Regions and Localities. (Policy Network Paper).
Penninx, R. (2013). Research on Migration and Integration in Europe: Achievements and Lessons. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA.
Penninx, M., Garcés-Mascareñas, B., Protasiewicz, P. M., Schwarz, H., & Caponio, T. (2014). European Cities and Their Migrant Integration Policies A State of the Art Study for the Knowledge for Integration Governance (KING) Project. (Fondazione ISMU, KING Project, Overview Paper No. 5).
Poppelaars, C., & Scholten, P. (2008). Two Worlds Apart: The Divergence of National and Local Immigrant Integration Policies in the Netherlands. Administration & Society, 40(4), 335–357.
Pratt, S. (2015). EU Policymaking and Research: Case Studies of the Communication on a Community Immigration Policy and the Common Basic Principles for Integration. In P. Scholten, H. Entzinger, R. Penninx, & S. Verbeek (Eds.), Integrating Immigrants in Europe: Research-Policy Dialogues (pp. 117–131). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.
Radaelli, C. (2003). The Europeanization of Public Policy. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 27–56). New York: Oxford University Press.
Richardson, J. (2012). Supranational State Building in the European Union. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Constructing a Policy-Making State? Policy Dynamics in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosenow, K. (2009). The Europeanization of Integration Policies. International Migration, 47(1), 133–159.
Schain, M. (2010). Managing Difference: Immigrant Integration Policy in France, Britain, and the United States. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 77(1), 205–236.
Scharpf, F. W. (1990). Games Real Actors Could Play: The Problem of Mutual Predictability. Rationality and Society, 2(4), 471–494.
Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview Press.
Scholten, P., & Penninx, R. (2016). The Multilevel Governance of Migration and Integration’. In Integration Processes and Policies in Europe. Contexts, Levels and Actors (pp. 91–108). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.
Shachar, A., & Hirschl, R. (2007). Citizenship as Inherited Property. Political Theory, 35(3), 253–287.
Snyder, F. (1993). Soft Law and Institutional Practice in the European Community. In S. Martin (Ed.), The Construction of Europe: Essays in Honour of Emile Noel (pp. 197–225). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Szyszczak, E. (2006). Experimental Governance: The Open Method of Coordination. European Law Journal, 12(4), 486–502.
Thielemann, E. (2001). The “Soft” Europeanization of Migration Policy: European Integration and Domestic Policy Change. Paper Presented at the ECSA Seventh Biennial International Conference.
Thränhardt, D. (2014). The State of European Integration Governance: A Comparative Evaluation. (Fondazione ISMU, KING Project, Desk Research Paper, No. 7).
Tilly, C., & Goodin, R. E. (2011). Overview of Contextual Political Analysis It Depends. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
TNS Qual+. (2011). Migrant Integration. European Commission: Qualitative Eurobarometer.
Treib, O. (2014). Implementing and Complying with EU Governance Outputs. Living Reviews in European Governance, 9, 5–47.
Trimikliniotis, N. (2012). The Instrumentalisation of EU Integration Policy: Reflecting on the Dignified Efficient and Undeclared Policy Aspects. In Y. Pascouau & T. Strik (Eds.), Which Integration Policies for Migrants? Interaction Between the EU and Its Member States (pp. 109–128). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
Urth, H. (2005). Building a Momentum for the Integration of Third-Country Nationals in the European Union. European Journal of Migration and Law, 7(2), 163–180.
Van Wolleghem, P. G. (2014). Inclusive Political Community: The Challenge of Liberal Polities. In E. Codini & M. D’Odorico (Eds.), Democracy and Citizenship in the 21st Century: Critical Issues and Perspectives (pp. 23–38). Milan: McGraw-Hill Education.
Velluti, S. (2007). What European Union Strategy for Integrating Migrants? The Role of OMC Soft Mechanisms in the Development of an EU Immigration Policy. European Journal of Migration and Law, 9(1), 53–82.
Vennesson, P. (2008). Case Studies and Process Tracing Theories and Practices. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (4th ed., pp. 223–239). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
EU Acts and Other Official Documents
COM. (2003). 336 Final—European Commission (2003). Communication from the Commission on Immigration, Integration and Employment.
Council of the European Union 14776/04. (2004). Note.
European Council. (1999). Tampere European Council 15 And 16 October 1999, Presidency Conclusions.
European Court of Auditors. (2012). Do the European Integration Fund and European Refugee Fund Contribute Effectively to the Integration of Third-Country Nationals? (Luxembourg).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Wolleghem, P.G. (2019). Introduction. In: The EU’s Policy on the Integration of Migrants. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97682-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97682-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97681-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97682-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)