Abstract
Social sciences have been always formed and influenced by the development of society, adjusting the conceptual, methodological, and theoretical frameworks to emerging social phenomena. In recent years, with the leap in the advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the proliferation of its everyday applications, “non-human intelligent actors” are increasingly becoming part of the society. This is manifested in the evolving realms of smart home systems, autonomous vehicles, chatbots, intelligent public displays, etc. In this paper, we present a prospective research project that takes one of the pioneering steps towards establishing a “distinctively sociological” conception of AI. Its first objective is to extract the existing conceptions of AI as perceived by its technological developers and (possibly differently) by its users. In the second part, capitalizing on a set of interviews with experts from social science domains, we will explore the new imaginable conceptions of AI that do not originate from its technological possibilities but rather from societal necessities. The current formal ways of defining AI are grounded in the technological possibilities, namely machine learning methods and neural network models. But what exactly is AI as a social phenomenon, which may act on its own, can be blamed responsible for ethically problematic behavior, or even endanger people’s employment? We argue that such conceptual investigation is a crucial step for further empirical studies of phenomena related to AI’s position in current societies, but also will open up ways for critiques of new technological advancements with social consequences in mind from the outset.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
Our arguments to consider only the currently employed Machine Learning and Neural Network algorithms rather than Agent-Based and BDI systems in the sociological conceptions of AI are based on the predominant proliferation of the former methods in intelligent applications which users often interact with.
References
Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1953)
Greenfield, A.: Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing. New Riders, Berkeley (2006)
Bauman, Z.: Úvahy o postmoderní době [Thoughts on the Postmodern Age]. Sociologické nakladatelství SLON, Prague (1995)
Lindemann, G.: The analysis of the borders of the social world: a challenge for sociological theory. J. Theor. Soc. Behav. 35, 69–98 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8308.2005.00264.x
Dunlap, R.E., Catton Jr., W.R.: Environmental sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 5, 243–273 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.05.080179.001331
Bryant, C.: The zoological connection: animal related human behavior. Soc. Forces 58, 399–421 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/58.2.399
MacKenzie, D., Wajcman, J. (eds.): The Social Shaping of Technology. Open University Press, Milton Keynes/Philadelphia (1985)
Nilsson, N.J.: The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Carley, K.M.: Artificial intelligence within sociology. Sociol. Method. Res. 25, 3–30 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124196025001001
Brent, E.E.: Is There a Role for Artificial Intelligence in Sociological Theorizing? Am. Sociol. 19, 158–166 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691809
Bainbridge, W.S., Brent, E.E., Carley, K.M., Heise, D.R., Macy, M.W., Markovsky, B., Skvoretz, J.: Artificial social intelligence. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 20, 407–436 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.002203
Woolgar, S.: Why not a sociology of machines? The case of sociology and artificial intelligence. Sociology 19, 557–572 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038585019004005
Wolfe, A.: Mind, self, society, and computer: artificial intelligence and the sociology of mind. Am. J. Sociol. 96, 1073–1096 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1086/229649
Schwartz, R.D.: Artificial intelligence as a sociological phenomenon. Can. J. Sociol. 14, 179–202 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/3341290
Malsch, T.: Naming the unnamable: socionics or the sociological turn of/to distributed artificial intelligence. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 4, 155–186 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1145/91474.91483
Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
Callon, M., Latour, B.: Unscrewing the big Leviathan. In: Knorr Cetina, K.D., Mulay, M. (eds.) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology, pp. 196–223. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1981)
Muhle, F.: Embodied conversational agents as social actors? Sociological considerations on the change of human-machine relations in online environments. In: Gehl, R.W., Bakardjieva, M. (eds.) Socialbots and their Friends: Digital Media and the Automation of Society, pp. 86–109. Routledge, New York/London (2017)
Laurier, E., Brown, B., McGregor, M.: Mediated pedestrian mobility: walking and the map app. Mobilities 11, 117–134 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2015.1099900
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R.A., Ko, J., Swetter, S.M., Blau, H.M., Thrun, S.: Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542, 115 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21056
Siemens, G., Long, P.: Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Rev. 46, 30 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/195
Brambilla, A., Alavi, H., Verma, H., Lalanne, D., Jusselme, T., Andersen, M.: “Our inherent desire for control”: a case study of automation’s impact on the perception of comfort. Energy Proced. 122, 925–930 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.414
Alavi, H.S., Verma, H., Bahrami, F., Lalanne, D.: Is driverless car another Weiserian mistake? In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 249–253. ACM, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3064857.3079155
Ross, D.A., Blasch, B.B.: Wearable interfaces for orientation and wayfinding. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, pp. 193–200. ACM, New York (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/354324.354380
Shen, H., Chan, K.Y., Coughlan, J., Brabyn, J.: A mobile phone system to find crosswalks for visually impaired pedestrians. Technol. Disabil. 20, 217–224 (2008)
Alavi, H.S., Churchill, E., Kirk, D., Bier, H., Verma, H., Lalanne, D., Schnädelbach, H.: From artifacts to architecture. In: Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 387–390. ACM, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3197393
Alavi, H.S., Lalanne, D., Nembrini, J., Churchill, E., Kirk, D., Moncur, W.: Future of human-building interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3408–3414. ACM, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856502
Alavi, H.S., Churchill, E., Kirk, D., Nembrini, J., Lalanne, D.: Deconstructing human-building interaction. Interactions 23, 60–62 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2991897
Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. SAGE, Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi (2004)
Fairclough, N.: Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge, London/New York (2003)
Garfinkel, H.: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1967)
Garfinkel, H.: Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2002)
Sacks, H.: Lectures on Conversation I-II. Blackwell, Oxford (1992)
Knoblauch, H., Schnettler, B., Raav, J., Soeffner, H.-G. (eds.): Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods. Lang, Bern (2006)
Hartmann, D.: Sociology and its publics: reframing engagement and revitalizing the field. Sociol. Q. 58, 3–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2016.1248132
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mlynář, J., Alavi, H.S., Verma, H., Cantoni, L. (2018). Towards a Sociological Conception of Artificial Intelligence. In: Iklé, M., Franz, A., Rzepka, R., Goertzel, B. (eds) Artificial General Intelligence. AGI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10999. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97676-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97676-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97675-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97676-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)